2005 journal article

Comparison of conventional and integrated pest management programs in public schools

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 98(4), 1275–1283.

author keywords: school IPM; IPM; German cockroach; Blattella germanica
MeSH headings : Animals; Cockroaches; Environmental Exposure; Insecticides / analysis; North Carolina; Pest Control / economics; Pest Control / methods; Pesticide Residues / analysis; Schools / standards; Time Factors
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that an IPM program is an appropriate and preferable alternative to conventional methods of pest control in the school environment and most of the conventional treatments were unnecessary. (via Semantic Scholar)
UN Sustainable Development Goals Color Wheel
UN Sustainable Development Goal Categories
Source: Web Of Science
Added: August 6, 2018

Journal Article Comparison of Conventional and Integrated Pest Management Programs in Public Schools Get access Gregory M. Williams, Gregory M. Williams 1 1Department of Entomology Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7613. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar H. Michael Linker, H. Michael Linker 2 2Department of Crop Science, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7613. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Michael G. Waldvogel, Michael G. Waldvogel 1 1Department of Entomology Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7613. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Ross B. Leidy, Ross B. Leidy 1 1Department of Entomology Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7613. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Coby Schal Coby Schal 1 1Department of Entomology Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7613. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Journal of Economic Entomology, Volume 98, Issue 4, 1 August 2005, Pages 1275–1283, https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-98.4.1275 Published: 01 August 2005 Article history Received: 18 December 2004 Accepted: 08 April 2005 Published: 01 August 2005