2009 journal article
Design and evaluation of dynamic text-editing methods using foot pedals
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 39(2), 358–365.
author keywords: Foot pedals; Text editing; Control systems
TL;DR:
Although the foot pedal control was not revealed to significantly increase text-editing performance over conventional mousing, the use of foot pedals may be considered in computing operations, including dynamic text-edsiting tasks, as an alternative or additional input method, particularly for special populations.
(via Semantic Scholar)
UN Sustainable Development Goal Categories
4. Quality Education
(OpenAlex)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: August 6, 2018
The objective of this study was to design and evaluate new dynamic text-editing methods (chatting, instant messenger) using a foot pedal control. A first experiment was to assess whether the foot-based method enhanced editing performance compared to conventional mouse use and to identify which type of foot control is most convenient for users. Five prototype methods including four new methods (two pedals or one pedal, 0 order or 1st order control), and one mouse method were developed and tested by performing a task requiring changing text sizes, dynamically. Results revealed methods involving 1st order pedal control to be comparable to the conventional method in task completion time, accuracy and subjective workload. Among the four foot control prototypes, two pedals with 1st order control was superior to in performance. A second experiment was conducted to test another prototype foot-based method for controlling font face, size, and color through feature selection with the left pedal and level selection with the right pedal. Text-editing performance was compared to conventional mouse-based editing. Results showed the foot pedals to degrade performance in terms of task completion time. However, the prototype interface has the advantage of making certain system functionality accessible to special populations that might not otherwise be able to use dynamic text-editing applications. Subjective comments demonstrated the foot pedal methods to be considered useful, time efficient and to reduce workload. It was observed that skilled users might perceive some relief from cumbersome mouse handling behaviors during typing. Although the foot pedal control was not revealed to significantly increase text-editing performance over conventional mousing, the use of foot pedals may be considered in computing operations, including dynamic text-editing tasks, as an alternative or additional input method, particularly for special populations. The development and evaluation of foot control interaction methods for text editing may provide useful insight for human-computer system designers considering the use of additional input devices or ways to support user expressions of emotion in text. The foot control approach may also be useful in interaction design for special populations (with functional limitations of the upper limbs) in terms of accessibility.