2020 journal article

Gastric artery embolization: studying the effects of catheter type and injection method on microsphere distributions within a benchtop arterial model

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 19(1).

co-author countries: United States of America 🇺🇸
author keywords: Gastric artery; Embolization; Vessel targeting; Reflux
MeSH headings : Catheters; Embolization, Therapeutic / instrumentation; Gastric Artery; Humans; Injections; Microspheres
Source: Web Of Science
Added: July 27, 2020

Abstract Aims The objective of the study is to investigate the effect of catheter type and injection method on microsphere distributions, specifically vessel targeting accuracy. Materials and methods The study utilized three catheter types (a standard end-hole micro-catheter, a Surefire anti-reflux catheter, and an Endobar occlusion balloon catheter) and both manual and computer-controlled injection schemes. A closed-loop, dynamically pressurized surrogate arterial system was assembled to replicate arterial flow for bariatric embolization procedures. Four vessel branches immediately distal to the injection site were targeted for embolization. Embolic microspheres were injected into the model using these three catheter types and both manual and computer-controlled injections. Results Across all injection methods, the catheter effect on the proportion of microspheres to target vessels (vs. non-target vessels) was significant ( p = 0.005). The catheter effect on the number of non-target vessels embolized was nearly significant ( p = 0.059). Across all catheter types, the injection method effect was not statistically significant for either of two outcome measures (percent microspheres to target vessels: p = 0.265, number of non-target vessels embolized: p = 0.148). Conclusion Catheter type had a significant effect on targeting accuracy across all injection methods. The Endobar catheter exhibited a higher targeting accuracy in pairwise comparisons with the other two injection catheters across all injection schemes and when considering the Endobar catheter with the manifold injection method vs. each of the catheters with the manual injection method; the differences were significant in three of four analyses. The injection method effect was not statistically significant across all catheter types and when considering the Endobar catheter/Endobar manifold combination vs. Endobar catheter injections with manual and pressure-replicated methods.