2012 journal article

A nationwide production analysis of state park attendance in the United States

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 99, 18–26.

By: C. Siderelis n, R. Moore n, Y. Leung n & J. Smith*

author keywords: Outdoor recreation; Production; State parks; Recreation economics; Recreation planning
MeSH headings : Public Facilities / statistics & numerical data; Recreation; United States
TL;DR: It is found that state governments will experience an ongoing need for more labor to maintain their parklands if attendance is to increase in the future, and that more capital expenditures are not likely to increase park utilization rates. (via Semantic Scholar)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: August 6, 2018

This study examined the production of U.S. states' park visits from 1984 to 2010 by state. In specifying the production equation in terms of the influences of the states' parklands, labor, and capital investments on the annual attendances, we found that state governments will experience an ongoing need for more labor to maintain their parklands if attendance is to increase in the future. Results also indicated that more capital expenditures are not likely to increase park utilization rates. Post-estimation procedures involved the application of the response residuals to identify the capacity utilization rates of the states' park systems over the past 27 years. Past utilization rates revealed operators met or exceeded capacity utilization expectations from 1984 through 1990. However, beginning in 1991, the annual mean utilization rate for the nation's supply of states' parks signaled a trend toward excess capacity. Our forecast revealed the mean utilizations over the next three years will vary between 90% and 95%. Post-estimation procedures also examined the relationship between state park management orientations (towards either public-lands preservation or recreational development) and projected annual capacity utilization rates. Results indicate that the quantity of added facilities to broaden their appeal to the public (i.e., a recreation orientation) was not important in explaining utilization capacities. However, an orientation toward public-lands preservation related significantly to greater utilization rates. In our view, the public will continue to accept current cost structures for continued operations of the states' parks on the compelling need for access to outdoor recreation to contribute to the visitor well-being.