2022 article
Feasibility of a best-worst scaling exercise to set priorities for autism research
Davis, S. A., Howard, K., Ellis, A. R., Jonas, D. E., Carey, T. S., Morrissey, J. P., & Thomas, K. C. (2022, June 8). HEALTH EXPECTATIONS.
author keywords: autism; best-worst scaling; direct prioritization; discrete-choice experiment; stakeholder engagement; stakeholder priorities
MeSH headings : Adult; Autistic Disorder / therapy; Biomedical Research; Caregivers; Child; Feasibility Studies; Health Priorities; Humans; Parents; Prospective Studies
open access via www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (repository)
UN Sustainable Development Goal Categories
3. Good Health and Well-being
(Web of Science)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: June 20, 2022
AbstractBackgroundThe preferences of autism stakeholders regarding the top priorities for future autism research are largely unknown.ObjectiveThis study had two objectives: First, to examine what autism stakeholders think new research investments should be and the attributes of investment that they consider important, and second, to explore the feasibility, acceptability and outcomes of two prioritization exercises among autism stakeholders regarding their priorities for future research in autism.DesignThis was a prospective stakeholder‐engaged iterative study consisting of best–worst scaling (BWS) and direct prioritization exercise.Setting and ParticipantsA national snowball sample of 219 stakeholders was included: adults with autism, caregivers, service providers and researchers.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcomes measures were attributes that participants value in future research investments, and priority research investments for future research.ResultsTwo hundred and nineteen participants completed the exercises, of whom 11% were adults with autism, 58% were parents/family members, 37% were service providers and 21% were researchers. Among stakeholders, the BWS exercises were easier to understand than the direct prioritization, less frequently skipped and yielded more consistent results. The proportion of children with autism affected by the research was the most important attribute for all types of stakeholders. The top three priorities among future research investments were (1) evidence on which child, family and intervention characteristics lead to the best/worst outcomes; (2) evidence on how changes in one area of a child's life are related to changes in other areas; and (3) evidence on dietary interventions. Priorities were similar for all stakeholder types.ConclusionsThe values and priorities examined here provide a road map for investigators and funders to pursue autism research that matters to stakeholders.Patient or Public ContributionStakeholders completed a BWS and direct prioritization exercise to inform us about their priorities for future autism research.