@article{osmond_shober_sharpley_duncan_hoag_2019, title={Increasing the Effectiveness and Adoption of Agricultural Phosphorus Management Strategies to Minimize Water Quality Impairment}, volume={48}, ISSN={["1537-2537"]}, DOI={10.2134/jeq2019.03.0114}, abstractNote={Phosphorus (P) is essential for optimum agricultural production, but it also causes water quality degradation when lost through erosion (sediment‐attached P), runoff (soluble reactive P; SRP), or leaching (sediment‐attached P or SRP). Implementation of conservation practices (CP) affects P at the source (avoiding), during transport (controlling), or at the water resource edge (trapping). Trade‐offs often occur with CP implementation. For instance, multiple researchers have shown that conservation tillage reduces total P by over 50%, while increasing SRP by upward of 40%. Conservation tillage may increase water quality degradation as SRP is more bioavailable than is particulate P. Conservation practices must be implemented as a system of practices to increase redundancy and to address all loss pathways, such as P management with conservation tillage and a riparian buffer. Further, planning and adoption must be at a watershed scale to ensure practices are placed in critical source areas, thereby providing the most treatment for the least price. Farmers must be involved in watershed planning, which should include financial backstopping and educational outreach. It is imperative that CPs be used more effectively to reduce and retard off‐site P losses. New and innovative CPs are needed to improve control of P leaching, address legacy stores of soil test P, and mitigate increased P losses expected with climate change. Without immediate changes to CP implementation, P losses will increase due to climate change, with a concomitant degradation of water quality. These changes must be made at a watershed scale and in an intentional and transparent manner.}, number={5}, journal={JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY}, author={Osmond, D. L. and Shober, A. L. and Sharpley, A. N. and Duncan, E. W. and Hoag, D. L. K.}, year={2019}, pages={1204–1217} }
 @article{hoag_babcock_foster_1993, title={FIELD-LEVEL MEASUREMENT OF LAND PRODUCTIVITY AND PROGRAM SLIPPAGE}, volume={75}, ISSN={["1467-8276"]}, DOI={10.2307/1242966}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={1}, journal={AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS}, author={HOAG, DL and BABCOCK, BA and FOSTER, WE}, year={1993}, month={Feb}, pages={181–189} }
 @article{hoag_holloway_1991, title={FARM PRODUCTION DECISIONS UNDER CROSS AND CONSERVATION COMPLIANCE}, volume={73}, ISSN={["0002-9092"]}, DOI={10.2307/1242894}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={1}, journal={AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS}, author={HOAG, DL and HOLLOWAY, HA}, year={1991}, month={Feb}, pages={184–193} }
 @article{hoag_jack_1990, title={Low-input farming systems under conservation compliance}, volume={45}, number={1}, journal={Journal of Soil & Water Conservation}, author={Hoag, D. L. and Jack, K. E.}, year={1990}, pages={71} }
 @article{hoag_1989, title={Budget Planner: User-oriented whole-farm budgeting software}, volume={21}, DOI={10.1017/s0081305200001035}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={1}, journal={Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics}, author={Hoag, D. L.}, year={1989}, pages={163} }
 @article{hoag_young_1985, title={Toward effective land retirement legislation}, volume={33}, number={5}, journal={Journal of Soil & Water Conservation}, author={Hoag, D. L. and Young, D. L.}, year={1985}, pages={462} }