Christopher Galik

A continuing need to revisit BECCS and its potential

Galik, C. S. (2020, January). NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, Vol. 10, pp. 2–3.

Piecemeal or combined? Assessing greenhouse gas mitigation spillovers in US forest and agriculture policy portfolios

CLIMATE POLICY, Vol. 19, pp. 1270–1283.

Polycentric Systems and Multiscale Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in the Built Environment(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave

REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 36(4), 473–496.

Facilitating markets and mitigation: A systematic review of early-action incentives in the US

Land Use Policy, Vol. 72, pp. 1–11.

Conservation program delivery in the southern U.S.: Preferences and interactions

Journal of Environmental Management, 198, 75–83.

Evaluating the US Mid-Century Strategy for Deep Decarbonization amidst early century uncertainty

Climate Policy, 17(8), 1046–1056.

Improving habitat exchange planning through theory, application, and lessons from other fields

Environmental Science & Policy, 73, 45–51.

Near-term pathways for achieving forest and agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation in the U.S.

Climate, 5(3).

Supply, Demand, and Uncertainty: Implications for Prelisting Conservation Policy

Ecological Economics, 137, 91–98.

Meeting renewable energy and land use objectives through public–private biomass supply partnerships

Applied Energy, 172, 264–274.

Sustainability guidelines and forest market response: An assessment of European Union pellet demand in the southeastern United States

GCB Bioenergy, 8(3), 658–669.

Biogas in the United States: estimating future production and learning from international experiences

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 22(3), 485–501.

Bundles, duties, and rights: A revised framework for analysis of natural resource property rights regimes

Land Economics, 91(1), 76–90.

Exploring the determinants of emerging bioenergy market participation

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 107–116.

The environmental and economic effects of regional bioenergy policy in the southeastern U.S.

Energy Policy, 85, 335–346.

Alternative approaches for addressing non-permanence in carbon projects: an application to afforestation and reforestation under the Clean Development Mechanism

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 21(1), 101–118.

Where is the carbon? carbon sequestration potential from private forestland in the southern United States

Journal of Forestry, 111(1), 17–25.

Analysis of the production and transaction costs of forest carbon offset projects in the USA

Journal of Environmental Management, 112, 128–136.

Effect of bioenergy demands and supply response on markets, carbon, and land use

Forest Science, 58(5), 523–539.

Managing dependencies in forest offset projects: Toward a more complete evaluation of reversal risk

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17(1), 17–24.

Operationalizing REDD+: Scope of reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6), 661–669.

The effect of assessment scale and metric selection on the greenhouse gas benefits of woody biomass

Biomass and Bioenergy, 44, 1–7.

The potential role for management of U.S. Public lands in greenhouse gas mitigation and climate policy

Environmental Management, 49(3), 523–533.

What makes carbon work? A sensitivity analysis of factors affecting forest offset viability

Forest Science, 58(5), 540–548.

A virtual "field test" of forest management carbon offset protocols: The influence of accounting

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 14(7), 677–690.

Extending rotation age for carbon sequestration: A cross-protocol comparison of North American forest offsets

Forest Ecology and Management, 259(2), 201–209.

Forest biomass supply in the southeastern United States - Implications for industrial roundwood and bioenergy production

Journal of Forestry, 107(2), 69–77.

Risks to forest carbon offset projects in a changing climate

Forest Ecology and Management, 257(11), 2209–2216.

Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the United States

Journal of Forestry, 106(3), 115–171.