Christopher Galik

Historical industrial transitions influence local sustainability planning, capability, and performance

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 46, 100690.

Institutional stability and change in environmental governance

Galik, C. S., Ba, Y., & Bobbitt, C. (2023, May 8). POLICY AND POLITICS, Vol. 5.

Planning for winter peaking power systems in the United States

Energy Policy, 173, 113376.

Accounting Considerations for Capturing the GHG Consequences of BECCS

Washington, D.C: Energy Futures Initiative.

Crediting temporary forest carbon: Retrospective and empirical perspectives on accounting options

FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 5.

From 'Think' to 'Do': Operationalizing the SDGs across the Curriculum at North Carolina State University

UN Chronicle.

Historical manufacturing volatility and local sustainability efforts: A link to the past

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 72.

When burning wood to generate energy makes climate sense

BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 78(3), 152–157.

Major US electric utility climate pledges have the potential to collectively reduce power sector emissions by one-third

ONE EARTH, 4(12), 1741–1751.

Opportunities and barriers to forest biomass energy: A case study of four U. S. states

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 148.

Report on the Impact of the Covid Crisis on Academic Research at North Carolina State University, Inequalities During COVID-19 Sub-Committee, University Research Committee

Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.

Revisiting institutional stability: A systematic review and distillations of dominant modes

[Review of ]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 31(5), 463–473.

U.S. State-Commissioned Energy Storage Studies: A Case Study of Research and Practice in a Rapidly Evolving Field

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 39.

A continuing need to revisit BECCS and its potential

Galik, C. S. (2020, January). NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, Vol. 10, pp. 2–3.

A practice-oriented approach to foster private landowner participation in ecosystem service conservation and restoration at a landscape scale

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 46.

Leveraging Open-Source Tools for Collaborative Macro-energy System Modeling Efforts

DeCarolis, J. F., Jaramillo, P., Johnson, J. X., McCollum, D. L., Trutnevyte, E., Daniels, D. C., … Zhou, Y. (2020, December 16). JOULE, Vol. 4, pp. 2523–2526.

Evaluating Policy and Market Barriers for Forest Biomass Energy Development. Report prepared for the Office of the Chief Economist, United States Department of Agriculture

Washington, D.C: United States Department of Agriculture.

Piecemeal or combined? Assessing greenhouse gas mitigation spillovers in US forest and agriculture policy portfolios

CLIMATE POLICY, 19(10), 1270–1283.

Polycentric Systems and Multiscale Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in the Built Environment Palabras clave

REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 36(4), 473–496.

Energy Storage Options for North Carolina

Raleigh, NC: Energy Policy Council, Joint Legislative Commission on Energy Policy.

Facilitating markets and mitigation: A systematic review of early-action incentives in the US

Land Use Policy, 72, 1–11.

Projecting landscape forest carbon emissions from changes in forest biomass electricity generation and forest products markets from 2014 to 2035: An analysis in Minnesota, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia, and Washington

Washington, D.C.: Office of the Chief Economist, United States Department of Agriculture.

Conservation program delivery in the southern US: Preferences and interactions

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 198, 75–83.

Evaluating the US Mid-Century Strategy for Deep Decarbonization amidst early century uncertainty

Climate Policy, 17(8), 1046–1056.

Improving habitat exchange planning through theory, application, and lessons from other fields

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 73, 45–51.

Near-Term Pathways for Achieving Forest and Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in the U.S.

CLIMATE, 5(3).

Supply, Demand, and Uncertainty: Implications for Prelisting Conservation Policy

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 137, 91–98.

Building carbon in America’s farms, forests, and grasslands: Foundations for a policy roadmap

Washington, D.C: Forest Trends.

Contributions of LiDAR to Ecosystem Service Planning and Markets: Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Investment

(No. NI WP 16-06). Durham, NC: Duke University.

Enhancing Home Energy Efficiency Through Natural Hazard Risk Reduction: Linking Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in the Home

Meeting renewable energy and land use objectives through public–private biomass supply partnerships

Applied Energy, 172, 264–274.

Researching a reimagined ESA: The continued need and opportunity for voluntary conservation

(No. NI WP 16-03). Durham, NC: Duke University.

Sustainability guidelines and forest market response: an assessment of European Union pellet demand in the southeastern United States

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 8(3), 658–669.

Biogas in the United States: estimating future production and learning from international experiences

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 22(3), 485–501.

Bundles, duties, and rights: A revised framework for analysis of natural resource property rights regimes

Land Economics, 91(1), 76–90. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84902099021&partnerID=MN8TOARS

Exploring the determinants of emerging bioenergy market participation

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 107–116.

The environmental and economic effects of regional bioenergy policy in the southeastern U.S.

Energy Policy, 85, 335–346.

Alternative approaches for addressing non-permanence in carbon projects: an application to afforestation and reforestation under the Clean Development Mechanism

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 21(1), 101–118.

Biogas in the United States: An assessment of market potential in a carbon-constrained future

(No. NI R 14-02). Durham, NC: Duke University.

Effect of policies on pellet production and forests in the U.S. South: a technical document supporting the Forest Service update of the 2010 RPA Assessment

Empirical insight into Section 10 permitting under the Endangered Species Act

(No. NI WP 14-02). Durham, NC: Duke University.

An Initial Assessment of the Economics, Carbon Scores, and Market Impacts of Selected Woody Feedstock Biomass Systems

(No. NI WP 13-06). Durham, NC: Duke University.

Where is the carbon? carbon sequestration potential from private forestland in the southern United States

Journal of Forestry, 111(1), 17–25.

Analysis of the production and transaction costs of forest carbon offset projects in the USA

Journal of Environmental Management, 112, 128–136.

Biogenic carbon accounting: Key considerations to a revised framework

(No. NI WP 12-06). Durham, NC: Duke University.

Effect of Bioenergy Demands and Supply Response on Markets, Carbon, and Land Use

FOREST SCIENCE, 58(5), 523–539.

Forest biomass supply for bioenergy in the southeast: evaluating assessment scale

In W. McWilliams & F. A. Roesch (Eds.), Monitoring across borders: Proceedings of the 2010 joint meeting of the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) symposium and the southern mensurationists (pp. 255–263). Asheville, NC: U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station.

Managing dependencies in forest offset projects: Toward a more complete evaluation of reversal risk

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17(1), 17–24.

Operationalizing REDD+: Scope of reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6), 661–669.

The effect of assessment scale and metric selection on the greenhouse gas benefits of woody biomass

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 44, 1–7.

The potential role for management of U.S. Public lands in greenhouse gas mitigation and climate policy

Environmental Management, 49(3), 523–533.

What makes carbon work? A sensitivity analysis of factors affecting forest offset viability

Forest Science, 58(5), 540–548.

Demand for REDD carbon credits: A primer on buyers, markets, and factors impacting prices

(No. NI WP 11-01). Durham, NC: Duke University.

Sticking Points in Offsets Policy

(No. NI PR OF-2). Durham, NC: Duke University.

The near-term market and greenhouse gas implications of forest biomass utilization in the southeastern United States

(No. CCPP 10-01). Durham, NC: Duke University.

The role of public lands in a low-carbon economy

Durham, NC: Duke University.

A virtual "field test" of forest management carbon offset protocols: The influence of accounting

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 14(7), 677–690.

Extending rotation age for carbon sequestration: A cross-protocol comparison of North American forest offsets

Forest Ecology and Management, 259(2), 201–209.

Forest biomass supply in the southeastern United States - Implications for industrial roundwood and bioenergy production

Journal of Forestry, 107(2), 69–77. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-67449127138&partnerID=MN8TOARS

Policy Options for the Conservation Reserve Program in a Low-Carbon Economy

Durham, NC: Duke University.

Risks to forest carbon offset projects in a changing climate

Forest Ecology and Management, 257(11), 2209–2216.

Transaction costs and forest management carbon offset potential

Durham, NC: Duke University.

Understanding H.R. 2454: Offsets

(No. NI PR HR-6). Durham, NC: Duke University.

Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the United States

Journal of Forestry, 106(3), 115–171. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-49349097569&partnerID=MN8TOARS