Elizabeth Lane

“Excuse me –” Race and Intersectionality of Interruptions at the U.S. Supreme Court

Lane, E., & Widner, K. (2024, February 20).

Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision Making. By Morgan L. W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 2022. 275p. $32.95 paper.

[Review of Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision Making, by M. L. W. Hazelton & R. K. Hinkle]. Perspectives on Politics, 21(2), 738–740.

State Courts, State Legislatures, and Setting Abortion Policy

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 48(4), 569–592.

A Separation-of-Powers Approach to the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Caseload

Journal of Law and Courts, 10(1), 1–12.

Politicized Battles: How Vacancies and Partisanship Influence Support for the Supreme Court

American Politics Research, 51(1), 23–36.

Judicial Discretion and US Supreme Court Agenda Setting

In J. S. Diascro, R. L. Solberg, & E. N. Waltenburg (Eds.), Open Judicial Politics (1st ed.). Oregon State University Open Textbook Initiative.

Review of The President and the Supreme Court: Going Public on Judicial Decisions from Washington to Trump by Paul M

[Review of The President and the Supreme Court: Going Public on Judicial Decisions from Washington to Trump, by P. M. Collins Jr. & M. Eshbaugh-Soha]. Law and Politics Book Review, 30(9), 141–148. http://www.lpbr.net/2020/10/the-president-and-supreme-court-going.html

The Purpose of Senatorial Grandstanding during Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

Journal of Law and Courts, 8(2), 333–358.

'A Matter of Great Importance’: Senator Preparation for Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

(White Paper No. 1). Arlen Specter Center for Public Service Research Fellowship. Thomas Jefferson University.

Agenda Setting and Case Selection on the U.S. Supreme Court

In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.