Jean Goodwin

Radford, J. T., Lackmann, G. M., Goodwin, J., Correia Jr, J., & Harnos, K. (2023). An Iterative Approach toward Development of Ensemble Visualization Techniques for High-Impact Winter Weather Hazards. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 104(9), E1649–E1669. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0193.1

Radford, J. T., Lackmann, G. M., Goodwin, J., Correia Jr, J., & Harnos, K. (2023). An Iterative Approach toward Development of Ensemble Visualization Techniques for High-Impact Winter Weather Hazards Part I: Product Development. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 104(9), E1630–E1648. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0192.1

Jhala, A., Cheng, Y., Goodwin, J., Singh, M. P., Anwar, M., Davis, L., … Zhang, T. (2022). A Digital Communication Twin for Addressing Misinformation: Vision, Challenges, Opportunities. IEEE Internet Computing, 26(2), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2021.3129547

Ladd, B. K., & Goodwin, J. (2022). Extreme arguments: Anwar al-Awlaki's radicalizing discourse. JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 200, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.08.004

Kauffeld, F. J., & Goodwin, J. (2022). Two Views of Speech Acts: Analysis and Implications for Argumentation Theory. LANGUAGES, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020093

Gibson, L. M., Busch, K. C., Stevenson, K. T., Cutts, B. B., DeMattia, E. A., Aguilar, O. M., … Wheaton, M. (2022, April 19). What is community-level environmental literacy, and how can we measure it? A report of a convening to conceptualize and operationalize CLEL. ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, Vol. 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2067325

Goodwin, J. (2020). Norms of advocacy. In J. A. Blair & C. W. Tindale (Eds.), Rigour and Reason : Essays in Honour of Hans Vilhelm Hansen (pp. 111–142). https://doi.org/10.22329/wsia.10.2020

Goodwin, J. (2020). Should Climate Scientists Fly? Informal Logic, 40(2), 157–203. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v40i2.6327

Goodwin, J. (2019). Chapter 9. Radically reframing the climate debate. In Argumentation in Context (pp. 157–172). https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.09goo

Goodwin, J. (2019). Sophistical refutations in  the climate change debates. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(1), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18008.goo

Goodwin, J., & Innocenti, B. (2019). The Pragmatic Force of Making an Argument. Topoi, 38(4), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09643-8

Priest, S., Goodwin, J., & Dahlstrom, M. F. (2018). Ethics and Practice in Science Communication. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226497952.001.0001

Ryan, S. F., Adamson, N. L., Aktipis, A., Andersen, L. K., Austin, R., Barnes, L., … Dunn, R. R. (2018). The role of citizen science in addressing grand challenges in food and agriculture research. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1891), 20181977. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1977

Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2016). Confronting the challenges of public participation: Issues in environmental, planning and health decision-making. Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.

Goodwin, J. (2015). Comment exercer une autorité experte ? Un scientifique confronté aux Sceptiques. Argumentation Et Analyse Du Discours, 9(15). https://doi.org/10.4000/aad.2035

Goodwin, J. (2014). Conceptions of Speech Acts in the Theory and Practice of Argumentation: A Case Study of a Debate About Advocating. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0003

Goodwin, J. (2014). Walter Lippmann, the indispensable opposition. In B. Jackson & G. Clark (Eds.), Trained capacities: John Dewey, rhetoric, and democratic practice (pp. 142–158). Columbia, SC: University of South Caroline Press.

Goodwin, J., & Dahlstrom, M. F. (2013). Communication strategies for earning trust in climate change debates. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(1), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/WCC.262

Goodwin, J., Dahlstrom, M. F., & Priest, S. (Eds.). (2013). Ethical issues in science communication: A theory-based approach. Retrieved from https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/sciencecommunication/2013/

Goodwin, J. (2013). L'autorità di Wikipedia. Sistemi Intelligenti, 25, 9–38.

Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2012). Between Scientists & Citizens: Assessing Expertise In Policy Controversies. Ames, IA: Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation and the Science Communication at Iowa State University Project.

Goodwin, J. (2011). Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts. Argumentation, 25(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10503-011-9219-6

Herndl, C. G., Goodwin, J., Honeycutt, L., Wilson, G., Graham, S. S., & Niedergeses, D. (2011). Talking Sustainability: Identification and Division in an Iowa Community. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 35(4), 436–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2011.562068

Goodwin, J., & Cortes, V. (2010). Theorists’ and practitioners’ spatial metaphors for argumentation: A corpus-based approach. Verbum, 23(1), 163–178.

Goodwin, J. (2010). Trust in experts as a principal-agent problem. In C. Reed & C. W. Tindale (Eds.), Dialectics, dialogue, and argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton's Theories of Reasoning and Argument (pp. 133–143). London: College Publications.

Goodwin, J. (2009). Actually Existing Rules for Closing Arguments. In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation (pp. 287–298). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_20

Goodwin, J., & Honeycutt, L. (2009). When science goes public: From technical arguments to appeals to authority. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(2), 125–136.

Goodwin, J. (2008). Argument Has No Function. Informal Logic, 27(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v27i1.465

Goodwin, J. (2007). Theoretical Pieties, Johnstone's Impiety, and Ordinary Views of Argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 40(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1353/par.2007.0012

McAndrews, G., Goodwin, J., & Mullen, R. E. (2006). Using environmental and ethical issues for debate in an introductory agronomy course. North American Colleges & Teachers of Agriculture Journal, 50(4), 54–61.

Goodwin, J. (2005). Designing premises. In F. H. Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Argumentation in practice (pp. 99–114). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.

Goodwin, J. (2005). The Public Sphere and the Norms of Transactional Argument. Informal Logic, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v25i2.1117

Goodwin, J. (2005). What Does Arguing Look Like? Informal Logic, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v25i1.1046

Goodwin, J. (2003). Students' Perspectives on Debate Exercises in Content Area Classes. Communication Education, 52(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302466

Goodwin, J. (2002). Designing Issues. In Dialectic and Rhetoric (pp. 81–96). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9948-1_7

Goodwin, J. (2002). We should be studying the norms of debate. In G. T. Goodnight (Ed.), Arguing Communication & Culture Selected papers from the Twelfth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 51–58). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.

Goodwin, J. (2001). Cicero's Authority. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 34(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1353/par.2001.0003

Goodwin, J. (2001). Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Still-Unacknowledged Contributions to Contemporary Argumentation Theory. Informal Logic, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v21i1.2234

Goodwin, J. (2001). The noncooperative pragmatics of arguing. In E. T. Nemeth (Ed.), Pragmatics in 2000 (pp. 263–277). Antwerp, Belgium: International Pragmatics Association.

Goodwin, J. (2000). Comments on [Jacobs's] Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics. Argumentation, 14, 287–292.

Leff, M., & Goodwin, J. (2000). Dialogic Figures and Dialectical Argument in Lincoln's Rhetoric. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 3(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2010.0102

Goodwin, J. (2000). Three Faces of the Future. Argumentation and Advocacy, 37(2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2000.11951660

Goodwin, J. (2000). Wigmore's Chart Method. Informal Logic, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i3.2278

Goodwin, J. (1998). Argumentation, 12(2), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007756117287

Goodwin, J. (1998). Deliberation and character. In J. F. Klumpp & T. A. Hollihan (Eds.), Argument in a time of change : definitions, frameworks, and critiques : proceedings of the Tenth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 70–74). Annandale, VA: National Communication Association.

Goodwin, J. (1997). Deliberation in the ancient Roman Senate. Parliamentary Journal, 38(1), 33–36.

Goodwin, J. (1995). Perelman, adhering and convictions. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 28(3), 215–233.