2024 journal article
Developing transmissible vaccines for animal infections
SCIENCE, 384(6693), 275–277.
2024 journal article
The need for more inclusive deliberation on ethics and governance in agricultural and food biotechnology
JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 11(1).
2023 article
Engineered and natural gene drives: mechanistically the same, yet not same in kind
Medina, R. F., & Kuzma, J. (2023, September 26). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, Vol. 14.
2023 article
Ensuring Sustainable Novel Plant Biotechnologies Requires Formalized Research and Assessment Programs
Grieger, K., & Kuzma, J. (2023, October 19). ACS AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, Vol. 3, pp. 970–972.
2023 article
Identifying sustainability assessment parameters for genetically engineered agrifoods
Wei, W., Grieger, K., Cummings, C. L., Loschin, N., & Kuzma, J. (2023, July 22). PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET, Vol. 7.
2023 article
Synthetic biology and governance research in China: a 40-year evolution
Tang, L., Kuzma, J., Zhang, Xi, Song, X., Li, Y., Liu, H., & Hu, G. (2023, July 18). SCIENTOMETRICS, Vol. 7.
2022 article
Exploring the value of a global gene drive project registry
Taitingfong, R. I., Triplett, C., Vasquez, V. N., Rajagopalan, R. M., Raban, R., Roberts, A., … Bloss, C. S. (2022, December 15). NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, Vol. 12.
Contributors: R. Taitingfong *, C. Triplett, V. Vásquez *, R. Rajagopalan *, R. Raban *, A. Roberts *, G. Terradas *, B. Baumgartner *
2022 journal article
Fostering Responsible Innovation through Stakeholder Engagement: Case Study of North Carolina Sweetpotato Stakeholders
Sustainability, 14(4), 2274.
2022 article
Genes drive organisms and slippery slopes
Resnik, D. B., Medina, R. F., Gould, F., Church, G., & Kuzma, J. (2022, December 23). PATHOGENS AND GLOBAL HEALTH, Vol. 12.
2022 article
Governance of Gene-edited Plants: Insights from the History of Biotechnology Oversight and Policy Process Theory
Kuzma, J. (2022, June 23). SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, Vol. 6.
2022 journal article
How can we promote the responsible innovation of nano-agrifood research?
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 137, 185–190.
2022 article
Narrative policy framework at the macro level-cultural theory-based beliefs, science-based narrative strategies, and their uptake in the Canadian policy process for genetically modified salmon
Williams, T. T., & Kuzma, J. (2022, February 14). PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, Vol. 2.
2022 journal article
Should Gene Editing Be Used to Develop Crops for Continuous-Living-Cover Agriculture? A Multi-Sector Stakeholder Assessment Using a Cooperative Governance Approach
FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 10.
2021 journal article
Barriers to responsible innovation of nanotechnology applications in food and agriculture: A study of US experts and developers
NANOIMPACT, 23.
2021 journal article
Responsible Innovation Definitions, Practices, and Motivations from Nanotechnology Researchers in Food and Agriculture
NanoEthics, 15(3), 229–243.
2021 journal article
Responsible innovation of nano-agrifoods: Insights and views from U.S. stakeholders
NanoImpact, 24, 100365.
2020 journal article
Community Led Governance for Gene Edited Crops
Science.
2020 article
Community-led governance for gene-edited crops A post-market certification process could promote transparency and trust
Kuzma, J., & Grieger, K. (2020, November 20). SCIENCE, Vol. 370, pp. 916–918.
2020 journal article
Core Committments for Field Trials of Gene Drive ORganisms
Science.
2020 chapter
Engineered Gene Drives: Ecological, environmental, and societal concerns
In A. Chaurasia, D. L. Hawksworth, & M. Pessoa de Miranda (Eds.), GMOs: Implications for Biodiversity Conservation and Ecological Processes. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Ed(s): A. Chaurasia, D. Hawksworth & M. Pessoa de Miranda
2020 journal article
Responsible Innovation in Biotechnology: Stakeholder Attitudes and Implications for Research Policy
Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 8(1), 47.
Ed(s): A. Iles & P. Macnaghten
2019 journal article
Anticipating risks, governance needs, and public perceptions of de-extinction
Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(2), 211–231.
Contributors: R. Valdez n, n , C. Cummings * & M. Nils Peterson n
2019 journal article
Best practices from nano-risk analysis relevant for other emerging technologies
Nature Nanotechnology, 14(11), 998–1001.
2019 weblog post
Biotechnology Oversight Gets an Early Make-Over by Trump’s White House and USDA: Part 1—The Executive Order
https://research.ncsu.edu/ges/2019/06/ag-biotech-oversight-makeover-part-1-eo/
2019 weblog post
Biotechnology Oversight Gets an Early Make-Over by Trump’s White House and USDA: Part 2 – The USDA-APHIS Rule
Kuzma, J. (2019, July 2). https://research.ncsu.edu/ges/2019/07/ag-biotech-oversight-makeover-part-2-usda-aphis-rule/
2019 journal article
Procedurally Robust Risk Assessment Framework for Novel Genetically Engineered Organisms and Gene Drives
Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1144–1165.
2019 book
Synthetic Biology 2020: Frontiers in Risk Analysis and Governance
In Risk, Systems and Decisions.
Ed(s): B. Trump *, C. Cummings*, n & I. Linkov *
2019 article
Synthetic Biology: Perspectives on Risk Analysis, Governance, Communication, and ELSI
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY 2020: FRONTIERS IN RISK ANALYSIS AND GOVERNANCE, pp. 1–18.
2019 article
The Role of Expert Disciplinary Cultures in Assessing Risks and Benefits of Synthetic Biology
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY 2020: FRONTIERS IN RISK ANALYSIS AND GOVERNANCE, pp. 351–370.
2018 article
Cataloguing the barriers facing RRI in innovation pathways: a response to the dilemma of societal alignment
JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, Vol. 5, pp. 338–346.
Contributors: & P. Roberts n n
2018 journal article
Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies
Environment Systems and Decisions, 38(2), 170–176.
Contributors: I. Linkov *, B. Trump *, E. Anklam*, D. Berube n, P. Boisseasu*, C. Cummings *, S. Ferson *, M. Florin *
2018 journal article
Editing nature: Local roots of global governance
Science, 362(6414), 527–529.
2018 report
Genome Editing in Agriculture—Methods, Applications, and Governance
(Issue Paper No. 60). Council on Agriculture Science and Technology.
2018 journal article
Regulating Gene-edited Crops
Issues in Science and Technology, 35(1), 80–85.
2018 weblog post
Space for the Social Sciences in Engineering Biology
Kuzma, J. (2018, March 18). http://issp.uottawa.ca/en/news/space-social-sciences-engineering-biology
2018 journal article
Wicked evolution: Can we address the sociobiological dilemma of pesticide resistance?
Science, 360(6390), 728–732.
2018 journal article
‘Mapping research and governance needs for gene drives’
‘Mapping research and governance needs for gene drives.’ Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5(sup1), S4–S12.
Contributors: J. Delborne n , n , F. Gould n , E. Frow *, C. Leitschuh n & J. Sudweeks n
2017 article
A cooperative governance network for crop genome editing
Jordan, N. R., Dorn, K. M., Smith, T. M., Wolf, K. E., Ewing, P. M., Fernandez, A. L., … al. (2017, October). EMBO REPORTS, Vol. 18, pp. 1683–1687.
Contributors: N. Jordan *, K. Dorn *, T. Smith *, K. Wolf*, P. Ewing *, A. Fernandez *, B. Runck *, A. Williams *, Y. Lu *, n
2017 journal article
A decision analytic model to guide early-stage government regulatory action: Applications for synthetic biology
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 12(1), 88–100.
Contributors: B. Trump *, C. Cummings *, n & I. Linkov *
2017 journal article
A roadmap for gene drives: using institutional analysis and development to frame research needs and governance in a systems context
Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5(S1), S13–S39.
Contributors: , F. Gould n , Z. Brown n , J. Collins *, J. Delborne n , E. Frow *, K. Esvelt *, D. Guston* n
2017 conference paper
Ethics and responsible innovation in biotechnology communities: A pedagogy of engaged scholarship
ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017-June. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85030554888&partnerID=MN8TOARS
2017 journal article
Forum: Biosecurity Governance for a Realistic New World
Issues in Science and Technology, 33(2).
2017 weblog post
Politics “Trumps” Science in the Regulation of Genetically Engineered Crops
Kuzma, J. (2017, November 7). https://research.ncsu.edu/ges/2017/11/politics-trumps-science-regulation-genetically-engineered-crops/
2017 book
Preparing for the Future Products of Biotechnology
[National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine Committee Report].
2017 journal article
Regulating animals with gene drive systems: lessons from the regulatory assessment of a genetically engineered mosquito
JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 5, S203–S222.
Contributors: Z. Meghani * & n
2017 personal communication
Rethinking biosecurity
2017 chapter
Risk, Environmental Governance, and Emerging Biotechnology
In R. Durant, D. J. Fiorino, & R. O'Leary (Eds.), Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities (2nd ed.). https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/environmental-governance-reconsidered-0
Ed(s): R. Durant, D. Fiorino & R. O'Leary
2017 journal article
Societal Risk Evaluation Scheme (SRES): Scenario-Based Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Synthetic Biology Applications
PLOS ONE, 12(1).
Contributors: C. Cummings * & n
2017 chapter
Society and policy maker’s responsibilities
In Consumer Perception of Product Risks and Benefits (pp. 547–566).
2017 article
Trails and Trials in Biotechnology Policy
WOMEN IN SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY: KEY ADVANCES AND PERSPECTIVES ON EMERGING TOPICS, pp. 85–96.
2016 article
A missed opportunity for US biotechnology regulation
Kuzma, J. (2016, September 16). SCIENCE, Vol. 353, pp. 1211–1213.
2016 report
As technology advances, how do we avoid losing touch with our values?
In World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/12/technology-how-do-we-avoid-losing-values/
2016 journal article
Attitudes towards governance of gene editing
Asian Biotechnology and Development Review, 18(1), 69–92. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85026651835&partnerID=MN8TOARS
2016 journal article
Engineering the Wild: Gene Drives and Intergenerational Equity
Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 56(3), 279–296.
2016 report
Future Generations and Gene Drives: the Importance of Intergenerational Equity
In Questions for a Resilient Future: Center for Humans and Nature. https://www.humansandnature.org/future-generations-and-gene-drives
2016 journal article
Is adaptation or transformation needed? Active nanomaterials and risk analysis
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 18(7).
2016 magazine article
New genetic engineering is slipping past old regulations
Kuzma, J. (2016, May 6). Aeon Magazine.
2016 article
Reboot the debate on genetic engineerin
Kuzma, J. (2016, March 10). NATURE, Vol. 531, pp. 165–167.
2015 journal article
Altruism and skepticism in public attitudes toward food nanotechnologies
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 17(3).
2015 report
Deextinction
(GES Center Issue Brief No. #2015.1).
2015 journal article
Forum
Issues in Science and Technology, 32(1), 5–12. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85020049912&partnerID=MN8TOARS
2015 journal article
Investigating factors influencing consumer willingness to buy GM food and nano-food
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 17(7).
Contributors: C. Yue *, S. Zhao *, C. Cummings * & n
2015 report
SynBio 101 Screenplay Draft
Durham, NC: Museum of Life and Science.
2015 report
Synthetic Biology Governance: Delphi Study Workshop Report
(GES Center Report No. #2015.2). Retrieved from research.ncsu.edu/ges
2015 journal article
Technology governance alternatives
Issues in Science and Technology, 32(1), 10–11.
2015 personal communication
Technology governance alternatives
2015 journal article
Transformation or Adaptation: Active Nanomaterials and Risk Governance. Workshop paper for “Next Generation Nano Governance
[Workshop Paper]. American Chemical Society, CNS-ASU, and Notre Dame NSF Funded Workshop.
Event: on October 9, 2015
2015 journal article
Translational governance research for synthetic biology
JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2(1), 109–112.
2014 journal article
CORRESPONDENCE: Synthetic biology: Missing the point
Nature, 510(7504), 218.
2014 journal article
Conflicting Futures
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 34(3-4), 108–120.
2014 journal article
Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences for Nanotechnology and Genetic-modification Technology in Food Products
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 66(2), 308–328.
2014 conference paper
Translational risk governance research
Workshop on Research Agenda in the Societal Aspects of Synthetic Biology. Presented at the Workshop on Research Agenda in the Societal Aspects of Synthetic Biology, Arizona State University.
Event: Workshop on Research Agenda in the Societal Aspects of Synthetic Biology at Arizona State University
2013 journal article
Consumer knowledge of genetically engineered organisms (GEOs)
Journal of Science Policy and Governance, 3(1), 1–39.
2013 journal article
Envisioning future governance of the bioeconomy
The Environmental Forum, 30(3).
2013 report
Examining the Oversight Challenges of Plant TagMo
[Workshop Report]. University of Minnesota.
2013 journal article
Governance of genetic biocontrol technologies for invasive fish
BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 16(6), 1299–1312.
Contributors: B. Gilna*, * & S. Otts *
2013 journal article
Hungry for Information: Public Attitudes Toward Food Nanotechnology and Labeling
REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 30(5), 512–548.
2013 journal article
Innovation in emerging energy technologies: A case study analysis to inform the path forward for algal biofuels
ENERGY POLICY, 61, 1595–1607.
Contributors: R. Haase*, J. Bielicki * & *
2013 journal article
Mapping the emerging field of genome editing
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 26(3), 321–352.
Contributors: A. Kuzhabekova * & n
2013 chapter
Properly paced? Examining the past and present governance of GMOS in the United States
In Innovative Governance Models for Emerging Technologies (pp. 176–197).
2013 journal article
Should Citizens Have a Say About Emerging Technologies?
Scholar’s Strategy Network, Policy Brief. https://scholars.org/contribution/should-citizens-have-say-about-emerging-technologies
2013 report
Social Robotics and Governance Challenges
[Workshop Report]. University of Minnesota Initiative on Governance and Emerging Technological Systems.
2012 report
Biosafety Technical Series No. 2: Summary and comparative analysis of nine national approaches to ecological risk assessment of living modified organisms in the context of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, Annex III
http://bch.cbd.int/protocol/cpb_technicalseries/cpb-ts-02-en.pdf
2012 report
Facing the Emerald Ash Borer in Minnesota
Minneapolis, MN: Stakeholder Public Dialogue, Humphrey School of Public Affairs.
2012 report
Genetically Modified Foods: Policy Context and Safety
(Policy Brief No. 1). Food Policy Research Center.
2012 chapter
Policy Innovation in Synthetic Biology Governance
In 21st Century Borders/Synthetic Biology: Focus on Responsibility and Governance: conference convened by the ISGP in partnership with the University of Arizona at the Hilton El Conquistador Hotel, Tucson, Arizona, U.S., Dec. 4-7, 2012. Tucson, AZ: Institute on Science for Global Policy (ISGP),
2011 journal article
Allhoff, Fritz, Patrick Lin, and Daniel Moore. 2010. What is nanotechnology and why does it matter? From science to ethics
JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY, 8(2), 209–211.
2011 journal article
Corporate social responsibility for nanotechnology oversight
MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 14(4), 407–419.
Contributors: & A. Kuzhabekova * *
2011 journal article
Dynamic oversight for nanobiotechnology
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13(4), 1345–1371.
2011 article
Introduction: designing nanobiotechnology oversight
Fatehi, L., Wolf, S. M., Ramachandran, G., & Kuzma, J. (2011, April). JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, Vol. 13, pp. 1341–1343.
Contributors: L. Fatehi*, S. Wolf *, G. Ramachandran * & *
2011 report
Minnesota Nanotechnology : A report to the state legislature
St. Paul, MN: Minnesota State Legislature.
2011 chapter
Nanotechnology governance and publics: Making connections in policy
In Nanotechnology and the Public Sphere. Taylor & Francis.
2011 journal article
Nanotechnology, voluntary oversight, and corporate social performance: does company size matter?
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 13(4), 1499–1512.
Contributors: & A. Kuzhabekova * *
2011 journal article
Recommendations for oversight of nanobiotechnology: Dynamic oversight for complex and convergent technology
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13(4), 1345–1371.
Contributors: G. Ramachandran *, S. Wolf *, J. Paradise*, * , R. Hall*, E. Kokkoli *, L. Fatehi*
2011 journal article
2011 journal article
Web vulnerability study of online pharmacy sites
INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE, 36(1), 20–34.
2010 conference paper
Evidence review and experts’ opinion on consumer acceptance of agrifood nanotechnology
Unpublished.
2010 chapter
Expert opinion of emerging technologies oversight: Lessons for nanotechnology from biotechnology
In Understanding Nanotechnology: Philosophy, Policy, and Publics (pp. 133–156). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
2010 chapter
Multi-criteria decision making for studying nanotechnology & society
Multi-criteria decision making for studying nanotechnology & society. In Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society.
2010 article
Nanotechnology in animal production-Upstream assessment of applications
Kuzma, J. (2010, May). LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, Vol. 130, pp. 14–24.
2010 chapter
Nanotechnology regulation and oversight
In Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Communication.
2010 journal article
Nanotechnology, Risk, and Oversight: Learning Lessons from Related Emerging Technologies
RISK ANALYSIS, 30(11), 1688–1698.
2010 chapter
Nanotechnology: Piecing Together the Puzzle of Risk
In Controversies in Science and Technology. Volume 3: From Evolution to Energy. Daniel Lee Kleinman (Ed.),
2010 magazine article
Nanotechnology: A History Lesson
Momentum Magazine.
2010 chapter
Nanotechnology: Environmental benefits
In Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society.
2010 magazine article
Sizing Up Nanotechnology Oversight
Kuzma, J. (2010, July). Minnesota Nano E-Newsletter, (13).
2010 journal article
Systems Mapping of Consumer Acceptance of Agrifood Nanotechnology
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY, 33(4), 299–322.
Contributors: R. Yawson * & *
2010 journal article
The "Revolving Door" between Regulatory Agencies and Industry: A Problem That Requires Reconceptualizing Objectivity
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 24(6), 575–599.
Contributors: Z. Meghani * & *
2010 journal article
Unpackaging synthetic biology: Identification of oversight policy problems and options
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 4(1), 92–112.
2009 journal article
A possible change in the U.S. risk -based decision making for emerging technological products: Compromised or enhanced objectivity?
EMBO Reports, 10, 1–6.
2009 chapter
2009 chapter
Biotechnology: Technology and future, prosperity and risks
In S. A. P. Jan-Kyrre Berg Olsen & V. F. Hendricks (Eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Malden, MA : Wiley-Blackwell.
Ed(s): S. Jan-Kyrre Berg Olsen & V. Hendricks
2009 journal article
Developing US Oversight Strategies for Nanobiotechnology: Learning from Past Oversight Experiences
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 37(4), 688–705.
Contributors: J. Paradise*, S. Wolf, * , A. Kuzhabekova *, A. Tisdale*, E. Kokkoli, G. Ramachandran
2009 review
Evaluating Oversight Systems for Emerging Technologies: A Case Study of Genetically Engineered Organisms
[Review of ]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 37(4), 546–586.
2009 report
FAO/WHO Expert Meeting on the Application of Nanotechnologies in the Food and Agriculture Sectors: Meeting Report.
In United Nations FAO/WHO [Meeting Report].
2009 chapter
2009 journal article
Improving oversight of genetically engineered organisms
Policy and Society, 28(4), 279–299.
Contributors: , A. Kuzhabekova * & K. Wilder* *
2009 journal article
Introduction: The challenge of developing oversight approaches to nanobiotechnology
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 37(4), 543–545.
Contributors: J. Paradise, S. Wolf *, * , G. Ramachandran * & E. Kokkoli
2009 journal article
2008 journal article
An Integrated Approach to Oversight Assessment for Emerging Technologies
Risk Analysis, 28(5), 1197–1220.
Contributors: , J. Paradise, G. Ramachandran, J. Kim, A. Kokotovich* & S. Wolf *
2008 journal article
Developing oversight frameworks for nanobiotechnology
Minnesota Journal of Law, Science, and Technology, 9(1), 399–416.
2008 journal article
Ethics of risk analysis and regulatory review: From bio- to nanotechnology
NanoEthics, 2(2), 149–162.
Contributors: & J. Besley * *
2008 journal article
Evaluating technology oversight through multiple frameworks: A case study of genetically engineered cotton in India
Science and Public Policy, 35(2), 121–138.
2008 chapter
FDA, the environment and ethics
In J. B. Callicott & R. Frodeman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of environmental ethics and philosophy. Farmington Hills, Mich. : ?b Gale, Cengage Learning.
Ed(s): J. Callicott & R. Frodeman
2008 journal article
Integrated oversight assessment: A historical case study and multicriteria approach
Risk Analysis, 28(5), 1179–1195.
2008 chapter
Nanotechnology, ethics and the environment
In J. B. Callicott & R. Frodeman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Gale, Cengage Learning.
Ed(s): J. Callicott & R. Frodeman
2008 journal article
Upstream Oversight Assessment for Agrifood Nanotechnology: A Case Studies Approach
Risk Analysis, 28(4), 1081–1098.
Contributors: , J. Romanchek* & A. Kokotovich* *
2007 journal article
Moving forward responsibly: Oversight for the nanotechnology-biology interface
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9(1), 165–182.
2006 article
Living with BSE
Kuzma, J., & Ahl, A. (2006, June). RISK ANALYSIS, Vol. 26, pp. 585–588.
2006 journal article
Moving forward responsibly: Oversight for the nanotechnology-biology interface
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9(1), 165–182.
2006 report
Nanotechnology in Agriculture and Food Production: Anticipated Applications.
[Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies]. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
2006 journal article
Nanotechnology oversight: Just do it
Environmental Law Reporter, 36, 10913–10920.
2005 report
Global Challenges and Biotechnology
In Economic Perspectives.
2004 book
Indicators for Waterborne Pathogens
Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
2004 report
The Search for Quality and Value in Health Care
Minneapolis, MN: Medical Technology Leadership Forum (MTLF).
2003 report
Breaking Down the Institutional Barriers to Multi-Disciplinary Research
Minneapolis, MN: Medical Technology Leadership Forum.
2003 report
Facilitating the Continuum from Experimental to Clinical Use: Designing Alternative Models
[A University of Minnesota Summit]. Minneapolis, MN: Medical Technology Leadership Forum.
2003 report
The Environmental Impact of Agriculture and Energy Use: How new technologies, including biotechnology, can provide sustainable solutions
In Research & Technology Seminar at the Intersection of Energy, Agriculture, and Biotechnology. Washington D.C: The Royal Norwegian Embassy, University of Minnesota.
2003 article
US agriculture is vulnerable to bioterrorism
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, Vol. 30, pp. 96–104.
Contributors: H. Moon*, C. Kirk-Baer, M. Ascher*, R. Cook*, D. Franz*, M. Hoy*, D. Husnik, H. Jensen *
2002 book
Animal Biotechnology
2002 book
Countering Agricultural Bioterrorism
2002 book
Countering Bioterrorism: The Role of Science and Technology
2002 report
Environmental Issues Associated with Transgenic Plants
Washington, DC: National Research Council.
2002 report
Marine Biotechnology in the 21st Century
Washington, DC: National Research Council.
2002 chapter
Report of the Lignin Modification Group
In Criteria for Field Testing Plants with Engineered Regulatory, Metabolic and Signaling Pathways. Blaxksburg: Information Systems for Biotechnology.
2002 journal article
The academy responds
Scientist, 16(20), 12. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0037078703&partnerID=MN8TOARS
2001 book
Ecological Monitoring of Genetically Modified Crops: A Workshop Summary
2001 report
Risk Assessment of the Public Health Impact of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in Ground Beef
[E. coli 0157:H7 Risk Assessment Team Report]. Washington, DC: USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service.
2000 book
Bioinformatics: Converting Data to Knowledge
2000 book
Genetically Modified Pest-Protected Plants: Science and Regulation
1999 book
Finding the Path: Issues of Access to Research Resources
1999 journal article
Microbes, food safety and the environment: Issues in risk analysis
Technology, 6, 363–369.
1999 journal article
Virtual access
Communications News, 36(12), 36-.
1998 conference paper
Adaptive risk analysis for resource conservation programs
Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources VIII, 172–186.
1998 report
Salmonella Enteritidis Risk Assessment: Shell Eggs and Egg Products
[Salmonella I Enteritidis Risk Assessment Team Final Report]. Washington, DC: USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service.
1997 journal article
Abscisic acid signaling through cyclic ADP-Ribose in plants
SCIENCE, 278(5346), 2126–2130.
Contributors: Y. Wu *, * , E. Maréchal *, R. Graeff*, H. Lee *, R. Foster*, N. Chua*
1997 conference paper
Adaptive risk analysis for resource conservation programs
Risk-Based Decision Making in Water Resources, Proceedings of the Conference, 172–186. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031384773&partnerID=MN8TOARS
1995 journal article
Bacteria produce the volatile hydrocarbon isoprene
Current Microbiology, 30(2), 97–103.
1995 journal article
Marine Vibrio species produce the volatile organic compound acetone
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61(1), 44–47. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0028976291&partnerID=MN8TOARS
1994 conference paper
Bacterial production of Isoprene
International Symposium on the Genetics of Microogranisms.
1993 article
Leaf isoprene emission rate is dependent on leaf development and the level of isoprene synthase (vol 101, pg 435, 1993)
Plant Physiology, Vol. 106, pp. 1233–1233.
Citation Index includes data from a number of different sources. If you have questions about the sources of data in the Citation Index or need a set of data which is free to re-distribute, please contact us.
Certain data included herein are derived from the Web of Science© and InCites© (2024) of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved. You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.