@article{hoque_chapman_moore_lavelle_saloni_woodbridge_king_2024, title={Environmental Sustainability Analysis of Rotary-Screen Printing and Digital Textile Printing}, volume={9}, ISSN={["2330-5517"]}, DOI={10.1177/24723444241275996}, abstractNote={Worldwide concern regarding the need for more sustainable textile supply chain prompted emphasis on innovation in the coloration process, often considered the most problematic segment of the supply chain. Digital textile printing, an emerging coloration technology, has the potential to improve sustainability significantly. This study undertakes an environmental sustainability analysis that compares the impacts of rotary-screen printing, the traditional, more established printing method, and digital textile printing. Researchers partnered with Creditex S.A.A., a vertically integrated textile company from Peru, to perform the research in a realistic factory setting. Creditex printed a 16-color design for an order of 1000m cotton fabric with reactive dye occupying both rotary-screen printing and digital textile printing and collected environmental impact data throughout the production process, including consumption, usage, and wastage. The findings suggest that digital textile printing is favorable to rotary-screen printing in terms of environmental sustainability impacts within the research context.}, journal={AATCC JOURNAL OF RESEARCH}, author={Hoque, Sharif Mohammad Azizul and Chapman, Lisa Parrillo and Moore, Marguerite and Lavelle, Jerome and Saloni, Daniel and Woodbridge, Janie and King, Kerry Maguire}, year={2024}, month={Sep} }
 @book{newnan_eschenbach_lavelle_2012, title={Engineering economic analysis}, publisher={New York: Oxford University Press}, author={Newnan, D. G. and Eschenbach, T. G. and Lavelle, J. P.}, year={2012} }
 @book{newman_eschenbach_lavelle_2009, title={Engineering economic analysis}, ISBN={9780195335415}, publisher={Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press}, author={Newman, D. G. and Eschenbach, T. G. and Lavelle, J. P.}, year={2009} }
 @article{sorenson_lavelle_2008, title={A Comparison of Fuzzy Set and Probabilistic Paradigms for Ranking Vague Economic Investment Information Using a Present Worth Criterion}, volume={53}, ISSN={0013-791X 1547-2701}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00137910701854594}, DOI={10.1080/00137910701854594}, abstractNote={This article introduces an approach for comparing the fuzzy set and probabilistic paradigms for ranking vague economic investment information when a present worth criterion is used. Comparisons are made between the two paradigms by forming a ratio of fuzzy ranking value to probabilistic ranking value for a set of tested economic decision conditions (vague cash flows and interest rates). A multivariable analysis of the comparison ratios indicates the dominance or spread required in the expected present worths of competing alternatives to guarantee consistent decision ranking among the paradigms. Results of the research suggest that probabilistic methods will not rank vague economic investment information the same as fuzzy set methods. As a result, decision makers who use probabilistic methods to model vagueness in human thought (the condition for which fuzzy theory was developed) may obtain rankings inconsistent with those obtained via the fuzzy models. In such cases, if decisions are based on project rankings, then different choices or recommendations are likely.}, number={1}, journal={The Engineering Economist}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={Sorenson, Gregory E. and Lavelle, Jerome P.}, year={2008}, month={Mar}, pages={42–67} }
 @inbook{spurlin_rajala_lavelle_2008, title={Assessing student learning: ensuring undergraduate students are learning what we want them to learn}, ISBN={9781579222123}, booktitle={Designing better engineering education through assessment: A practical resource for faculty and department chairs on using assessment and ABET criteria to improve student learning}, publisher={Sterling, Va: Stylus Publishing.}, author={Spurlin, J. and Rajala, S. and Lavelle, J.}, year={2008} }
 @book{designing better engineering education through assessment: a practical resource for faculty and department chairs on using assessment and abet criteria to improve student learning_2008, ISBN={1579222129}, publisher={Sterling, VA: Stylus Pub.}, year={2008} }
 @book{donald g. newnan_lavelle_2004, title={Engineering economic analysis}, publisher={New York: Oxford University Press}, author={Donald G. Newnan, Ted G. Eschenbach and Lavelle, Jerome P.}, year={2004} }
 @inproceedings{spurlin_lavelle_robbins_rajala_2003, title={Assessment of introduction to engineering and problem-solving course}, booktitle={American Society for Engineering Education}, author={Spurlin, J. E. and Lavelle, J. and Robbins, M. C. and Rajala, S. A.}, year={2003} }
 @book{economic evaluation of advanced technologies: techniques and case studies_2002, ISBN={1560329157}, publisher={New York: Taylor & Francis}, year={2002} }
 @book{newnan_lavelle_eschenbach_2002, title={Essentials of engineering economic analysis (2nd ed.)}, ISBN={0195150015}, publisher={New York: Oxford University Press}, author={Newnan, D. G. and Lavelle, J. P. and Eschenbach, T. G.}, year={2002} }
 @inproceedings{spurlin_rajala_lavelle_hoskins_2002, title={Outcomes assessment:  developing an electronic assessment database as a model for collection and analysis of data}, booktitle={American Society for Engineering Education}, author={Spurlin, J. E. and Rajala, S. A. and Lavelle, J. P. and Hoskins, O. J.}, year={2002} }
 @book{newnan_lavelle_g._2000, title={Engineering economic analysis (8th ed.)}, ISBN={1576450538}, publisher={Austin, Texas: Engineering Press}, author={Newnan, D. G. and Lavelle, J. P. and G., Eschenbach T.}, year={2000} }