@article{reimschuessel_grabenstein_guag_nemser_song_qiu_clothier_byrne_marks_cadmus_et al._2017, title={Multilaboratory Survey To Evaluate Salmonella Prevalence in Diarrheic and Nondiarrheic Dogs and Cats in the United States between 2012 and 2014}, volume={55}, ISSN={0095-1137 1098-660X}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02137-16}, DOI={10.1128/jcm.02137-16}, abstractNote={ABSTRACT Eleven laboratories collaborated to determine the periodic prevalence of Salmonella in a population of dogs and cats in the United States visiting veterinary clinics. Fecal samples (2,965) solicited from 11 geographically dispersed veterinary testing laboratories were collected in 36 states between January 2012 and April 2014 and tested using a harmonized method. The overall study prevalence of Salmonella in cats (3 of 542) was <1%. The prevalence in dogs (60 of 2,422) was 2.5%. Diarrhea was present in only 55% of positive dogs; however, 3.8% of the all diarrheic dogs were positive, compared with 1.8% of the nondiarrheic dogs. Salmonella-positive dogs were significantly more likely to have consumed raw food (P = 0.01), to have consumed probiotics (P = 0.002), or to have been given antibiotics (P = 0.01). Rural dogs were also more likely to be Salmonella positive than urban (P = 0.002) or suburban (P = 0.001) dogs. In the 67 isolates, 27 unique serovars were identified, with three dogs having two serovars present. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 66 isolates revealed that only four of the isolates were resistant to one or more antibiotics. Additional characterization of the 66 isolates was done using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Sequence data compared well to resistance phenotypic data and were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). This study suggests an overall decline in prevalence of Salmonella-positive dogs and cats over the last decades and identifies consumption of raw food as a major risk factor for Salmonella infection. Of note is that almost half of the Salmonella-positive animals were clinically nondiarrheic.}, number={5}, journal={Journal of Clinical Microbiology}, publisher={American Society for Microbiology}, author={Reimschuessel, Renate and Grabenstein, Michael and Guag, Jake and Nemser, Sarah M. and Song, Kyunghee and Qiu, Junshan and Clothier, Kristin A. and Byrne, Barbara A. and Marks, Stanley L. and Cadmus, Kyran and et al.}, editor={Fenwick, BradEditor}, year={2017}, month={Feb}, pages={1350–1368} }
 @article{dorman_alpi_chappell_2013, title={Subject Matter Expert and Public Evaluations of a Veterinary Toxicology Course Brochure-Writing Assignment}, volume={40}, ISSN={["0748-321X"]}, DOI={10.3138/jvme.0912.082r}, abstractNote={Veterinary schools are increasingly developing students' communication skills, with an emphasis placed on practice conveying medical and scientific knowledge to different audiences. We describe how patient-centered written communication has been integrated into the training of veterinary students using toxicology-related preventive materials. Third-year veterinary students were given an assignment to prepare a client-focused brochure related to veterinary toxicology. Since 2010, 148 students have completed this assignment, with an average score of 93.4%. Use of a grading rubric was instituted in 2011 and resulted in a more rigorous assessment of the brochures by the course instructors. In this study, we evaluated a sample (n=6) selected from 10 brochures volunteered for further public and expert assessment. Each brochure was measured for readability and assessed with a rubric for perceived usefulness and acceptability by 12 veterinary toxicologists and 10 or 11 adult members of the public attending a college of veterinary medicine open house. Veterinary toxicologist review anticipated that the brochures would be useful for most clients, and the public reviewers confirmed this assessment. Evaluation of the brochures using set marking criteria and readability indexes showed that students had successfully targeted the chosen audiences. Feedback showed that the general public rated the sample brochures highly in terms of quality, usefulness, and interest. Completion of this study has resulted in revision of the grading rubric, an increased use of brochure examples, and additional instruction in readability assessment and brochure development, thereby improving the assignment as a learning exercise.}, number={1}, journal={JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION}, author={Dorman, David C. and Alpi, Kristine M. and Chappell, Kimberly H.}, year={2013}, pages={19–28} }