Kim Ebert

Ideological Legitimacy, Color-blindness, and Racially Conservative Organizations

SOCIAL PROBLEMS.

Apathy and Color-Blindness in Privatized Immigration Control

SOCIOLOGY OF RACE AND ETHNICITY, 6(4), 533–547.

Polarized Toward Apathy: An Analysis of the Privatized Immigration-Control Debate in the Trump Era

Estrada, E. P., Ebert, K., & Liao, W. (2020, October). PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, Vol. 53, pp. 679–684.

Examining the reach of color blindness: Ideological flexibility, frame alignment, and legitimacy among racially conservative and extremist organizations

Sociological Quarterly, 58(2), 254–276.

Policing immigrants: Local law enforcement on the front lines

[Review of ]. Contemporary Sociology, 46(5), 591–593.

Apathy and antipathy: media coverage of restrictive immigration legislation and the maintenance of symbolic boundaries

Sociological Forum, 31(3), 555–576.

Group boundaries, immigrant inclusion, and the politics of immigrant-native relations

[Review of ]. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(2), 224–250.

Legitimating contexts, immigrant power, and exclusionary actions

Social Problems (Society for the Study of Social Problems), 62(1), 40–67.

Anti-immigrant ordinances and discrimination in new and established destinations

American Behavioral Scientist, 58(13), 1784–1804.

When organizations matter threatening demographics, supportive politics, and immigration lawmaking

Du Bois Review-Social Science Research on Race, 11(2), 387–417.

Social citizenship, integration and collective action: Immigrant civic engagement in the United States

Social Forces, 91(4), 1267–1292.

¿El Campeón de Los Hispanos? Comparing the coverage of Latino/a collective action in Spanish- and English-language newspapers

Latino Studies, 9(2-3), 219–241.

Beyond the ballot: Immigrant collective action in gateways and new destinations in the United States

Social Problems (Society for the Study of Social Problems), 57(4), 529–558.

Newcomers, outsiders, and insiders immigrants and american racial politics in the early twenty first century

[Review of ]. Social Forces, 89(1), 357–359.