@article{iyer_wilson_draucker_hobgood_2023, title={Physician Men Leaders in Emergency Medicine Bearing Witness to Gender-Based Discrimination}, volume={6}, ISSN={["2574-3805"]}, DOI={10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49555}, abstractNote={Key Points Question How do men physician leaders perceive and respond to gender-based discrimination (GBD) against women colleagues? Findings In this qualitative study including 18 men academic department chairs in emergency medicine, all study participants reported either witnessing or learning of incidents of GBD against women colleagues. Participants reported that these experiences with GBD stimulated powerful emotional responses and presented a choice about taking action. Meaning These findings suggest that GBD against women impacts targets and observers and institutional cultures must be intolerant of GBD to support all physicians.}, number={1}, journal={JAMA NETWORK OPEN}, author={Iyer, Maya S. and Wilson, Kalah and Draucker, Claire and Hobgood, Cherri}, year={2023}, month={Jan} }
 @article{kleinman_copp_wilson_2021, title={We've Come a Long Way, Guys! Rhetorics of Resistance to the Feminist Critique of Sexist Language}, volume={35}, ISSN={["1552-3977"]}, DOI={10.1177/0891243220979636}, abstractNote={We provide a qualitative analysis of resistance to calls for gender-neutral language. We analyzed more than 900 comments responding to two essays—one on AlterNet and another on Vox posted to the Vox editor’s Facebook page—that critiqued a pervasive male-based generic, “you guys.” Five rhetorics of resistance are discussed: appeals to origins, appeals to linguistic authority, appeals to aesthetics, appeals to intentionality and inclusivity, and appeals to women and feminist authorities. These rhetorics justified “you guys” as a nonsexist term, thereby allowing commenters to continue using it without compromising their moral identities as liberals or feminists. In addition to resisting an analysis that linked their use of “you guys” to social harms, commenters positioned the authors who called for true generics as unreasonable, divisive, and authoritarian. We conclude with suggestions for how feminists can challenge the status quo and promote social change.}, number={1}, journal={GENDER & SOCIETY}, author={Kleinman, Sherryl and Copp, Martha and Wilson, Kalah B.}, year={2021}, month={Feb}, pages={61–84} }