@article{nelson_cuchiara_hendren_jones_marshall_2021, title={Hazardous Spills at Retired Fertilizer Manufacturing Plants Will Continue to Occur in the Absence of Scientific Innovation and Regulatory Enforcement}, volume={55}, ISSN={["1520-5851"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05311}, DOI={10.1021/acs.est.1c05311}, abstractNote={ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEViewpointNEXTHazardous Spills at Retired Fertilizer Manufacturing Plants Will Continue to Occur in the Absence of Scientific Innovation and Regulatory EnforcementNatalie G. Nelson*Natalie G. NelsonBiological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695, North Carolina, United StatesCenter for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695, North Carolina, United States*Phone: 919-515-6741; email: [email protected]More by Natalie G. NelsonView Biographyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3258-7622, Maude L. CuchiaraMaude L. CuchiaraMaterials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695, North Carolina, United StatesMore by Maude L. Cuchiarahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8493-6620, Christine Ogilvie HendrenChristine Ogilvie HendrenResearch Institute for Environment, Energy and Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone 28608-2067, North Carolina, United StatesGeological and Environmental Science, Appalachian State University, Boone 28608-2067, North Carolina, United StatesMore by Christine Ogilvie Hendrenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-6545, Jacob L. JonesJacob L. JonesMaterials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695, North Carolina, United StatesMore by Jacob L. Joneshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9182-0957, and Anna-Maria MarshallAnna-Maria MarshallSociology, University of Illinois Urbana−Champaign, Urbana 61801, United StatesMore by Anna-Maria MarshallCite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 24, 16267–16269Publication Date (Web):November 29, 2021Publication History Received6 August 2021Published online29 November 2021Published inissue 21 December 2021https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c05311https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05311article-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY 4.0. License Summary*You are free to share (copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt (remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.View full license*DisclaimerThis summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials. This publication is Open Access under the license indicated. Learn MoreArticle Views2392Altmetric-Citations4LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (2 MB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Byproducts,Manufacturing,Phosphorus,Separation science,Wastewater Get e-Alerts}, number={24}, journal={ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY}, publisher={American Chemical Society (ACS)}, author={Nelson, Natalie G. and Cuchiara, Maude L. and Hendren, Christine Ogilvie and Jones, Jacob L. and Marshall, Anna-Maria}, year={2021}, month={Dec}, pages={16267–16269} }
 @article{grieger_merck_cuchiara_binder_kokotovich_cummings_kuzma_2021, title={Responsible innovation of nano-agrifoods: Insights and views from U.S. stakeholders}, volume={24}, ISSN={2452-0748}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2021.100365}, DOI={10.1016/j.impact.2021.100365}, abstractNote={To date, there has been little published work that has elicited diverse stakeholder views of nano-agrifoods and of how nano-agrifoods align with the goals of responsible innovation. This paper aims to fill this research gap by investigating views of nano-agrifoods, how well their development adheres to principles of responsible innovation, and potential challenges for achieving responsible nano-agrifood innovation. Using an online engagement platform, we find that U.S. stakeholder views of responsible innovation were dominated by environmental, health, and safety (EHS) contexts, considerations of societal impacts, opportunities for stakeholder engagement, and responding to societal needs. These views overlap with scholarly definitions of responsible innovation, albeit stakeholders were more focused on impacts of products, while the field of responsible innovation strives for more "upstream" considerations of the process of innovation. We also find that views of nano-agrifoods differed across applications with dietary supplements and improved whitening of infant formula viewed least favorably, and environmental health or food safety applications viewed most favorably. These findings align with the larger body of literature, whereby stakeholders are expected to be more supportive of nanotechnology used in agricultural applications compared to directly within food and food supplements. Overall, participants indicated they held relatively neutral views on research and innovation for nano-agrifoods being conducted responsibly, and they identified key challenges to ensuring their responsible innovation that were related to uncertainties in EHS studies, the need for public understanding and acceptance, and adequate regulation. In light of these results, we recommend future research efforts on EHS impacts and risk-benefit frameworks for nano-agrifoods, better understanding stakeholder views on what constitutes effective regulation, and addressing challenges with effective regulation and responsible innovation practices.}, journal={NanoImpact}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Grieger, Khara D. and Merck, Ashton W. and Cuchiara, Maude and Binder, Andrew R. and Kokotovich, Adam and Cummings, Christopher L. and Kuzma, Jennifer}, year={2021}, month={Oct}, pages={100365} }