@article{parsons_azevedo_elsherif_guay_shahim_govaart_norris_o'mahony_parker_todorovic_et al._2022, title={A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms}, volume={2}, ISSN={["2397-3374"]}, DOI={10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4}, abstractNote={Open scholarship has transformed research, and introduced a host of new terms in the lexicon of researchers. The ‘Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Teaching’ (FORRT) community presents a crowdsourced glossary of open scholarship terms to facilitate education and effective communication between experts and newcomers.}, journal={NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR}, author={Parsons, Sam and Azevedo, Flavio and Elsherif, Mahmoud M. and Guay, Samuel and Shahim, Owen N. and Govaart, Gisela H. and Norris, Emma and O'Mahony, Aoife and Parker, Adam J. and Todorovic, Ana and et al.}, year={2022}, month={Feb} }
 @book{ruttenberg_taylor_vandegrift_vitale_2022, title={Accelerating Social Impact Research: Libraries at the Intersection of Openness and Community-Engaged Scholarship}, url={https://doi.org/10.29242/report.asirjune2022}, DOI={10.29242/report.asirjune2022}, abstractNote={This is the first report of a six-month pilot cohort program from 2021, Accelerating the Social Impact of Research (ASIR). The pilot engaged small teams from eight ARL member libraries who wanted to share strategies to accelerate the adoption and implementation of open-science principles for social-impact research and scholarship. The report, Accelerating Social Impact Research: Libraries at the Intersection of Openness and Community-Engaged Scholarship, sets the context for this confluence, draws examples from the participating members of the cohort, and identifies the opportunities available for research library leaders. The next installments of this publication series will include additional profiles of the cohort libraries and how they are advancing open scholarship and community engagement.}, author={Ruttenberg, Judy and Taylor, Shawna and Vandegrift, Micah and Vitale, Cynthia Hudson}, year={2022}, month={Jun} }
 @article{saia_nelson_young_parham_vandegrift_2022, title={Ten Simple Rules for Researchers Who Want to Develop Web Apps}, volume={1}, url={https://doi.org/10.31223/X57P6R}, DOI={10.31223/X57P6R}, abstractNote={Growing interest in data-driven, decision-support tools across the life sciences and physical sciences has motivated development of web applications, also known as web apps. Web apps can help disseminate research findings and present research outputs in ways that are more accessible and meaningful to the general public--from individuals, to governments, to companies. Specifically, web apps enable exploration of scenario testing and policy analysis (i.e., to answer “what if?”) as well as co-evolution of scientific and public knowledge. However, the majority of researchers developing web apps receive little formal training or technical guidance on how to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of their web-based decision support tools. Take some of us for example. We (Saia and Nelson) are agricultural and environmental engineers with little experience in web app development, but we are interested in creating web apps to support sustainable aquaculture production in the Southeast. We had user (i.e., shellfish growers) interest, a goal in mind (i.e., develop a new forecast product and decision-support tool for shellfish aquaculturalists), and received funding to support this work. Yet, we experienced several unexpected hurdles from the start of our project that ended up being fairly common hiccups to the seasoned web app developers among us (Young, Parham). As a result, we share the following Ten Simple Rules, which highlight take home messages, including lessons learned and practical tips, of our experience as burgeoning web app developers. We hope researchers interested in developing web apps draw insights from our (in)experience as they set out on their decision support tool development journey.}, publisher={California Digital Library (CDL)}, author={Saia, Sheila and Nelson, Natalie and Young, Sierra and Parham, Stanton and Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2022}, month={Jan} }
 @article{saia_nelson_young_parham_vandegrift_2022, title={Ten simple rules for researchers who want to develop web apps}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1553-7358"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009663}, DOI={10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009663}, abstractNote={Growing interest in data-driven, decision-support tools across the life sciences and physical sciences has motivated development of web applications, also known as web apps. Web apps can help disseminate research findings and present research outputs in ways that are more accessible and meaningful to the general public--from individuals, to governments, to companies. Specifically, web apps enable exploration of scenario testing and policy analysis (i.e., to answer “what if?”) as well as co-evolution of scientific and public knowledge. However, the majority of researchers developing web apps receive little formal training or technical guidance on how to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of their web-based decision support tools. Take some of us for example. We (Saia and Nelson) are agricultural and environmental engineers with little experience in web app development, but we are interested in creating web apps to support sustainable aquaculture production in the Southeast. We had user (i.e., shellfish growers) interest, a goal in mind (i.e., develop a new forecast product and decision-support tool for shellfish aquaculturalists), and received funding to support this work. Yet, we experienced several unexpected hurdles from the start of our project that ended up being fairly common hiccups to the seasoned web app developers among us (Young, Parham). As a result, we share the following Ten Simple Rules, which highlight take home messages, including lessons learned and practical tips, of our experience as burgeoning web app developers. We hope researchers interested in developing web apps draw insights from our (in)experience as they set out on their decision support tool development journey.}, number={1}, journal={PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY}, author={Saia, Sheila M. and Nelson, Natalie G. and Young, Sierra N. and Parham, Stanton and Vandegrift, Micah}, editor={Markel, ScottEditor}, year={2022}, month={Jan} }
 @article{gordy_ramirez_vandegrift_goller_2021, title={Editorial: Research Topic Tools, Techniques, and Strategies for Teaching in a Real-World Context With Microbiology}, volume={12}, ISSN={["1664-302X"]}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.755500}, DOI={10.3389/fmicb.2021.755500}, abstractNote={EDITORIAL article Front. Microbiol., 13 October 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.755500}, journal={FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY}, publisher={Frontiers Media SA}, author={Gordy, Claire L. and Ramirez, Melissa V. and Vandegrift, Micah and Goller, Carlos C.}, year={2021}, month={Oct} }
 @book{mann_vandegrift_rosenfeld_2021, title={Immersive Scholar: A Guidebook for Documenting and Publishing Experiential Scholarship Works}, ISBN={9781469664286}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.5149/9781469664286_mann}, DOI={10.5149/9781469664286_Mann}, abstractNote={"Immersive Scholar: A Guidebook for Documenting and Publishing Experiential Scholarship Works" offers a model for librarians, technologists, and scholars collaborating on the production of new forms of scholarly projects, particularly those designed for large scale or immersive spaces. Born from Immersive Scholar, a three-year grant to the NC State University Libraries from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, the case studies and principles laid out in this guidebook highlight pragmatic and non-technical opportunities for integrating experiential scholarship within the current scholarly ecosystem. Borrowing from the literature and ideas of digital humanities, open science, software preservation, and academic publishing, the authors present a perspective balanced between theory and application. This guidebook paired with other resources from Immersive Scholar forms the foundation of a toolkit for the conceptualization, building, displaying, and sharing of scholarship in the broad and varied world of large scale, visual, immersive, and experimental work.}, journal={UNC Press}, publisher={NC State University Libraries}, author={Mann, Abigail and Vandegrift, Micah and Rosenfeld, C.}, year={2021}, month={Mar} }
 @article{goller_vandegrift_cross_smyth_2021, title={Sharing Notes is Encouraged: Annotating and Co-creating with Hypothes.is and Google Docs}, volume={22}, ISSN={["1935-7885"]}, DOI={10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2135}, abstractNote={Effectively analyzing literature can be challenging for those unfamiliar with studies from rapidly evolving research fields. Previous studies have shown that incorporating primary literature promotes scientific literacy and critical thinking skills. ABSTRACT Effectively analyzing literature can be challenging for those unfamiliar with studies from rapidly evolving research fields. Previous studies have shown that incorporating primary literature promotes scientific literacy and critical thinking skills. We’ve used collaborative note-taking and annotation of peer-reviewed articles to increase student engagement with course content and primary literature. Participants annotate articles using the web-annotation tool Hypothes.is and have access to comments from their peers. Groups are then assigned to summarize the annotations and findings, posting a synthesis for the course’s Hypothes.is group. In parallel, students contribute to common notes. The instructor generates a weekly video discussing the student notes. The goal of these activities is to foster an environment of open annotation and co-creation of knowledge to aid in studying for deeper learning. Compiled notes can be used to create an open educational resource (OER). The OER provides an entry point for future students and the public. Based on the evaluation of annotations, notes, and assessments, we conclude that these activities encourage student engagement and achievement of learning outcomes while raising awareness of the importance of open and collaborative practices.}, number={1}, journal={Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education}, author={Goller, C. and Vandegrift, M. and Cross, W. and Smyth, D.}, year={2021}, month={Jan} }
 @article{hampson_desart_steinhauer_gadd_vandegrift_erdmann_johnson_2020, title={Open Science Roadmap: Recommendations to UNESCO}, volume={5}, url={https://journals.gmu.edu/index.php/osi/article/view/2735}, DOI={10.13021/osi2020.2735}, abstractNote={UNESCO intends to design an “open science” plan to beconsidered by the UN General Assembly in late 2021. As part of that plan formation, UNESCO has solicited the input of the Open Scholarship Initiative. OSI has worked in partnership with UNESCO since early 2015 to forge a workable, equitable, and sustainable path to improvedopenness of all research, not solely science. OSI recommends that UNESCO forthwith adopt the enclosed OSI “roadmap” to develop its UN open science plan.}, journal={Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings}, author={Hampson, Glenn and DeSart, Mel and Steinhauer, Jason and Gadd, Elizabeth and Vandegrift, Micah and Erdmann, Chris and Johnson, Rob}, year={2020}, month={May} }
 @article{a model for institutional support for open praxis_2019, DOI={10.5281/zenodo.2633343}, journal={Zenodo}, year={2019}, month={Apr} }
 @article{graban_marty_romano_vandegrift_2019, title={Introduction: Questioning Collaboration, Labor, and Visibility in Digital Humanities Research}, volume={013}, number={2}, journal={Digital Humanities Quarterly}, author={Graban, Tarez Samra and Marty, Paul and Romano, Allen and Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2019}, month={Aug} }
 @article{periodic table of the open research ecosystem_2019, DOI={10.5281/zenodo.3263989}, journal={Zenodo}, year={2019}, month={Jun} }
 @article{anderson_vandegrift_2019, title={Plan S Point–Counterpoint: Discussing the Plan Together}, volume={9}, DOI={10.31229/osf.io/zpa4v}, abstractNote={At the ISMTE 2019 North American Meeting, Rick Anderson, Associate Dean for Collections & Scholarly Communication at the J. Willard Marriott Library at the University of Utah and Micah Vandegrift, Open Knowledge Librarian at North Carolina State University Libraries, discussed their different opinions regarding some of the finer points of Plan S. They prepared responses for 10 questions for the meeting but were only able to respond to some of them in person. The following is the full Q&A that they prepared for the meeting, with references added.}, publisher={Center for Open Science}, author={Anderson, Rick and Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2019}, month={Sep} }
 @article{glass_vandegrift_2019, title={Public Scholarship in Practice and Philosophy}, url={https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:22279/}, DOI={10.17613/g64d-gd16}, author={Glass, Erin and Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2019} }
 @article{vandegrift_2019, title={The Golden Age of the Green Ecosystem: A Color-Blind Perspective on Repositories}, volume={31}, url={https://against-the-grain.com/2019/12/v315-the-golden-age-of-the-green-ecosystem-a-color-blind-perspective-on-repositories/}, number={5}, journal={Against the Grain}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2019}, month={Dec} }
 @article{vandegrift_2018, title={Designing Digital Scholarship Ecologies}, volume={1}, DOI={10.31229/osf.io/93zvb}, abstractNote={Digital Scholarship and Scholarly Communication are transforming the practice of librarianship by 1) integrating throughout the research process, 2) re-positioning the core of libraries, 3) increasing focus on “back of the house” processes/skills, 4) facilitating an outward orientation. Approaching these through the frames of design and ecology offer a useful re-imagining of our current state and possible futures.}, publisher={Center for Open Science}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2018}, month={Jan} }
 @article{vandegrift_hallman_gurley_nicaragua_mann_nutt_wust_raschke_hayes_lang_et al._2018, title={Immersive Scholar}, url={https://osf.io/3z7k5/}, DOI={10.17605/OSF.IO/3Z7K5}, note={William Mischo, Elisandro Cabada. Released on GitHub and Open Science Framework. Accessible at}, journal={NC State University Libraries}, author={Vandegrift, Immersive Scholar Micah and Hallman, Shelby and Gurley, Walt and Nicaragua, Mildred and Mann, Abigail and Nutt, Mike and Wust, Markus and Raschke, Greg and Hayes, Erica and Lang, Jasmine and et al.}, year={2018}, month={Apr} }
 @article{clement_agate_searle_kingsley_vandegrift_2018, title={JLSC Board Editorial 2018}, volume={6}, url={https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2261}, DOI={10.7710/2162-3309.2261}, abstractNote={The current scholarly communication landscape is populated by a variety of actors and powered by an ever-increasing array of complementary and competitive systems for the production, publication, and distribution of scholarship. Recent years have also seen increasing numbers of proposals to recast these systems in ways that better align with the needs and values of the academy and its scholars. In this editorial, members of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication consider the present environment and contemplate the future of academy-owned and -supported scholarly communication, as well as the role of libraries in that future.}, number={1}, journal={Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication}, publisher={Pacific University Library}, author={Clement, Gail and Agate, Nicky and Searle, Samantha and Kingsley, Danny and Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2018}, month={Jun} }
 @article{vandegrift_2018, title={Open Scholarship Policies and Technologies: The European Research Library as a Model for Advancing Global Scholarly Communication}, volume={8}, DOI={10.31229/osf.io/95s24}, abstractNote={This is the proposal I submitted to the Fulbright-Schuman award, for which I was awarded a fellowship in the winter of 2018-2019.}, publisher={Center for Open Science}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2018}, month={Aug} }
 @article{ippoliti_koshoffer_julian_vandegrift_soper_meridien_2018, title={Scaling Research Data Management Services Along the Maturity Spectrum: Three Institutional Perspectives}, volume={1}, DOI={10.31229/osf.io/wz8fn}, abstractNote={Research data services promise to advance many academic libraries’ strategic goals of becoming partners in the research process and integrating library services with modern research workflows. Academic librarians are well positioned to make an impact in this space due to their expertise in managing, curating, and preserving digital information, and a history of engaging with scholarly communications writ large. Some academic libraries have quickly developed infrastructure and support for every activity ranging from data storage and curation to project management and collaboration, while others are just beginning to think about addressing the data needs of their researchers. Regardless of which end of the spectrum they identify with, libraries are still seeking to understand the research landscape and define their role in the process.This article seeks to blend both a general perspective regarding these issues with actual case studies derived from three institutions, University of Cincinnati, Oklahoma State University, and Florida State University, all of which are at different levels of implementation, maturity, and campus involvement.}, publisher={Center for Open Science}, author={Ippoliti, Cinthya and Koshoffer, Amy E and Julian, Renaine and Vandegrift, Micah and Soper, Devin and Meridien, Sophie}, year={2018}, month={Jan} }
 @article{advocates, activists, and @-holes: advance open by defining your default mode._2017, DOI={10.6084/m9.figshare.5123374}, journal={Figshare}, year={2017} }
 @article{moritz_smart_retteen_hunter_stanley_soper_vandegrift_2017, title={De-Centering and Recentering Digital Scholarship: A Manifesto}, volume={8}, DOI={10.31229/osf.io/t7hfu}, abstractNote={Digital scholarship is an evolving area of librarianship. In this piece we propose 10 theses, statements about what this kind of work DOES, rather than trying to define with it IS. We believe that digitally-inflected research and learning, and the characteristics they employ, are essential to the recentering of our profession's position in/across the academy. We also believe that the "digital scholarship center" has served its time, and that the activities and models for digital scholarship work are core to librarianship. This manifesto is meant to serve as a starting point for a necessary discussion, not an end-all, be-all. We hope others will write and share counter-manifestos, passionate responses, or affirming statements.}, publisher={Center for Open Science}, author={Moritz, Carolyn and Smart, Rachel and Retteen, Aaron and Hunter, Matthew and Stanley, Sarah and Soper, Devin and Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2017}, month={Aug} }
 @article{discover dh: data edition_2017, DOI={10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.4816663}, abstractNote={These are the presentations from our training series on humanities data. <br>}, journal={Figshare}, year={2017} }
 @article{a table summarizing the federal public access policies resulting from the us office of science and technology policy memorandum of february 2013_2016, DOI={10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1372041.V5}, journal={Figshare}, year={2016} }
 @article{crossdisciplines at the crossroads_2016, DOI={10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3443468.V1}, journal={Figshare}, year={2016} }
 @article{digital scholarship and the future of cross-disciplinary work in research || digital humanities_2016, DOI={10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3565629}, journal={Figshare}, year={2016} }
 @article{digital, data, documentation: we're not in scholcomm kansas anymore_2016, DOI={10.17605/OSF.IO/MKEVN}, journal={Open Science Framework}, year={2016} }
 @article{discover dh: introduction to digital humanities theories and methods_2016, DOI={10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.4287263}, abstractNote={Florida State University Libraries presents an introductory workshop series in the Digital Humanities. These sessions are designed to teach students and faculty the basic theories and methods behind digital research in the humanities. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from larger issues in digital research in the academy to specific tools and research techniques. The weeks will be divided into “yack” sessions and “hack” sessions. The yack sessions will begin with a short presentation on an issue facing humanities scholars in the digital world. These will be followed by a discussion by all participants. For the hack sessions, we will begin learning a specific tool for humanities research. These sessions are hands-on and often require specific tools to be set up in advance.}, journal={Figshare}, year={2016} }
 @inproceedings{julian_vandegrift_besara_2016, title={It Takes Teamwork to Make the Dream Work: Delivering data management services in a team based environment}, url={https://figshare.com/articles/It_Takes_Teamwork_to_Make_the_Dream_Work_Delivering_data_management_services_in_a_team_based_environment/3202006}, note={DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.3202006.v1}, booktitle={Research Data Access and Preservation (RDAP)}, author={Julian, Renaine and Vandegrift, Micah and Besara, Rachel}, year={2016}, month={Apr} }
 @article{managing scope and scale: applying the incubator model to digital scholarship_2016, DOI={10.17605/OSF.IO/DBF25}, journal={Open Science Framework}, year={2016} }
 @article{periodic table of digital research resources_2016, DOI={10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3465686.V3}, journal={Figshare}, year={2016} }
 @article{billings_bobley_mccollough_mudditt_naim_pinter_price_roche_sprio_vandegrift_2016, title={Report from the Evolving Open Solutions (2) Workgroup}, volume={1}, DOI={10.13021/g86s3j}, abstractNote={Are the scholarly publishing tools we’re using today still the right ones? Is the monograph still the best format in the humanities? Is the journal article still best in STM? These products can be difficult to produce and edit, nearly impenetrable to read, and—as in the case of clinical research information—they aren’t necessarily the best-suited formats for capturing every piece of necessary information (like protocols and datasets in medical research) and showing how this information is all connected to other scholarship. What other formats and options are being considered or used? What are the prospects of change? How about the stakeholder universe itself? How are roles, responsibilities and expectations changing (and where might they end up)? Are we “settling” on half-measures or on the best possible solutions?}, journal={Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings}, publisher={Mason Publishing, George Mason University Libraries}, author={Billings, Marilyn and Bobley, Brett and McCollough, Aaron and Mudditt, Alison and Naim, Kamran and Pinter, Frances and Price, Richard and Roche, Tony and Sprio, Lisa and Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2016}, month={Apr} }
 @article{the library's role in shaping the future of scholarly communication and publishing_2016, DOI={10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3199531}, journal={Figshare}, year={2016} }
 @book{vandegrift_university_2016, title={[Digital Research] [services] in 21st Century - Leading Research, Teaching and Learning}, DOI={10.15200/winn.146230.06254}, abstractNote={Digital research and scholarship is an area of growth and investment for many libraries, and defined loosely at different institutions.In this job talk, I propose that digital research support be separated from "services" and that libraries must reimagine our role in the research landscape as we embark into this area.I close by suggesting that the adopting of a portfolio management model, proposed by Jen Vinopal at NYU, will serve to coordinize the future of digital research and digital services.}, journal={The Winnower}, institution={The Winnower, LLC}, author={Vandegrift, Micah and University, Florida State}, year={2016}, month={Apr} }
 @article{lee_burnett_baeg_vandegrift_morris_2015, title={Availability and accessibility in an open access institutional repository: a case study}, url={http://www.informationr.net/ir/20-1/paper661.html#.VieRAKK-GKw}, journal={Information Research}, author={Lee, Jongwook and Burnett, Gary and Baeg, Jung Hoon and Vandegrift, Micah and Morris, Richard}, year={2015} }
 @article{vandegrift_bolick_2014, title={"Free to All": Library Publishing and the Challenge of Open Access}, volume={2}, url={http://jlsc-pub.org/articles/abstract/10.7710/2162-3309.1181/}, DOI={10.7710/2162-3309.1181}, abstractNote={There is a significant and important responsibility as libraries move into the role of publishing to retain our heritage of “access for all.” Connecting and collaborating with colleagues in the publishing industry is essential, but should come with the understanding that the library as an organization is access-prone. This article discusses the complexities of navigating that relationship, and calls for libraries and publishers to embrace and respect the position from which we begin. Finally, the article forecasts several possible characteristics of what “publishing” might look like if libraries press the principle of access in this growing area.}, note={DOI:}, number={4}, journal={Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication}, author={Vandegrift, M. and Bolick, J.}, year={2014}, pages={1181} }
 @misc{vandegrift_bowley_2014, title={LIS Journals measured for "openness."}, url={http://figshare.com/articles/LIS_Journals_measured_for_openness_/994258}, author={Vandegrift, Micah and Bowley, Chealsye}, year={2014}, month={Apr} }
 @article{vandegrift_bowley_2014, title={Librarian, Heal Thyself: A Scholarly Communication Analysis of LIS Journals}, url={http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2014/healthyself/}, journal={In the Library with the Lead Pipe}, author={Vandegrift, Micah and Bowley, Chealsye}, year={2014} }
 @inproceedings{vandegrift_2014, title={Library as Publisher: pwning Open Access}, url={https://micahvandegrift.wordpress.com/2014/03/06/pwnoa/}, booktitle={Library Publishing Forum}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2014}, month={Mar} }
 @article{referee report. for: cash, carrots, and sticks: open access incentives for researchers [v1; approved 1, http://f1000r.es/4b9]_2014, DOI={10.5256/F1000RESEARCH.5589.R6619}, journal={F1000Research}, year={2014} }
 @inproceedings{vandegrift_2014, title={Scholarly Communication is People: Its Our Time - OR - Three crazy ideas for LIS to “own” open access}, url={https://micahvandegrift.wordpress.com/2014/12/17/changelispublishing/}, booktitle={ACRL New York}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2014}, month={Dec} }
 @inproceedings{vandegrift_2014, title={The Miseducation of Scholarly Communication}, url={https://micahvandegrift.wordpress.com/2014/06/02/ssptalk/}, booktitle={Society for Scholarly Publishing}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2014}, month={Jun} }
 @book{vandegrift_2013, title={#AHAGate: In Retrospect}, url={https://micahvandegrift.wordpress.com/2013/08/15/ahagate-in-retrospect/}, journal={The Infornado}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2013}, month={Aug} }
 @article{ford_leeder_dorney_vandegrift_2013, title={Editorial: DIY Library Culture and the Academy}, volume={4}, url={http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2013/diy-library-culture/}, journal={In the Library with the Lead Pipe}, author={Ford, Emily and Leeder, Kim and Dorney, Erin and Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2013}, month={Apr} }
 @article{vandegrift_varner_2013, title={Evolving in Common: Creating Mutually Supportive Relationships Between Libraries and the Digital Humanities}, volume={9}, url={http://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/cwzbf}, DOI={10.1080/01930826.2013.756699}, abstractNote={ABSTRACT The authors lay out practical ways for libraries to involve themselves in this evolving area, especially focused on current strengths of many libraries including commitments to resource accessibility and project development. Finally, this article proposes that the role of the research librarian is evolving in order to effectively integrate the library as a partner in the scholarship of digital humanities.}, number={9}, journal={Journal of Library Administration}, author={Vandegrift, M. and Varner, S.}, year={2013}, month={Jan}, pages={3–78} }
 @book{vandegrift_bolick_rose_2013, title={Open Access Week 2013 - Final Report}, url={http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/library_faculty_publications/9/}, journal={Florida State University Libraries}, author={Vandegrift, Micah and Bolick, Josh A and Rose, Nina}, year={2013} }
 @misc{open access week poster_2013, DOI={10.6084/m9.figshare.838248}, publisher={Micah Vandegrift, Joshua Bolick. figshare}, year={2013}, month={Nov} }
 @book{vandegrift_2013, title={Proof}, url={https://micahvandegrift.wordpress.com/2013/01/30/proof/}, journal={The Infornado}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2013}, month={Jan} }
 @article{vandegrift_2013, title={Rewards and Recognition in Librarianship}, url={http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2013/rewards/}, journal={In the Library with the Lead Pipe}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2013} }
 @article{vandegrift_2013, title={The Digital Public Library of America: Details, the Librarian Response and the Future.}, url={http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2013/dpla/}, journal={In the Library with the Lead Pipe}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2013} }
 @book{ammidown_bowley_chou_coleman_eaker_feerrar_fonsh_foster_frazier_glass_et al._2013, title={The HLS Guide to Library School}, url={http://hacklibschool.pressbooks.com/}, publisher={The Hack Library School, hacklibschool. wordpress. com}, author={Ammidown, Steve and Bowley, Chealsye and Chou, Rose L and Coleman, Kevin and Eaker, Chris and Feerrar, Julia and Fonsh, Nicole and Foster, Britt and Frazier, Zack and Glass, Alison and et al.}, year={2013} }
 @article{vandegrift_2012, title={#alt-LIS OR The Question of the Hybrarian OR What is Digital Humanities and What's It Doing in the Library?}, url={http://southeast2012.thatcamp.org/03/08/alt-lis/}, journal={THATCamp Southeast 2012}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2012}, month={Mar} }
 @article{vandegrift_colvin_2012, title={Relational communications: Developing key connections}, volume={73}, url={http://crln.acrl.org/content/73/7/386.short}, number={7}, journal={College and Research Libraries News}, publisher={Association of College & Research Libraries}, author={Vandegrift, Micah and Colvin, Gloria}, year={2012}, month={Aug}, pages={386–389} }
 @article{vandegrift_2012, title={What Is Digital Humanities and What’s it Doing in the Library?}, volume={6}, url={http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2012/dhandthelib/}, journal={In the Library with the Lead Pipe}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2012}, month={Jun} }
 @book{vandegrift_2011, title={Faculty Senate Library Committee-Task Force on Scholarly Communications: Final Report}, url={http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/library_faculty_publications/2/}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2011} }
 @article{vandegrift_2011, title={Readings on "The Future of Librarianship: IT and DH PhDs"}, url={http://chnm2011.thatcamp.org/05/19/futurelibrarianship/}, journal={THATCamp CHNM 2011}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2011}, month={May} }
 @phdthesis{vandegrift_2009, title={Music Scenes in America: Gainesville, Florida as a Case Study for Historicizing Subculture}, url={http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/etd/4589/}, school={FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY}, author={Vandegrift, Micah}, year={2009} }