@article{mabrito_2013, title={Are expressivists guilty of wishful thinking?}, volume={165}, ISSN={["0031-8116"]}, DOI={10.1007/s11098-012-0003-8}, number={3}, journal={PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES}, author={Mabrito, Robert}, year={2013}, month={Sep}, pages={1069–1081} }
 @article{mabrito_2013, title={ON SOME RECENT ATTEMPTS TO RESOLVE THE DEBATE BETWEEN INTERNALISTS AND EXTERNALISTS}, volume={51}, ISSN={["0038-4283"]}, DOI={10.1111/sjp.12013}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={2}, journal={SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY}, author={Mabrito, Robert}, year={2013}, month={Jun}, pages={179–205} }
 @article{mabrito_2013, title={WELFARE AND PARADOX}, volume={38}, ISSN={["2153-7984"]}, DOI={10.5840/jpr20133815}, abstractNote={The basic idea of a desire theory of welfare is that how good a life is for the person who lives it is a matter of how many of that person’s desires are satisfied. The more satisfied desires the better the life. That it is possible for a person to desire that his or her life go badly is thought to pose problems for such a view. Indeed, some have recently argued that the possibility of such desires entails that a desire theory of welfare leads to paradox. In this paper, I present this purported paradox for the desire theory of welfare, offer a new solution to it, and defend it from objections that have been made to other responses.}, journal={JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH}, author={Mabrito, Robert}, year={2013}, pages={299–322} }
 @article{mabrito_2005, title={Does Shafer-Landau Have a Problem with Supervenience?}, volume={126}, ISSN={0031-8116 1573-0883}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S11098-005-2163-2}, DOI={10.1007/S11098-005-2163-2}, number={2}, journal={Philosophical Studies}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Mabrito, Robert}, year={2005}, month={Nov}, pages={297–311} }
 @misc{mabrito_2005, title={Moral realism: A defense}, volume={126}, number={2}, journal={Philosophical Studies (Dordrecht, Netherlands)}, author={Mabrito, R.}, year={2005}, pages={297–311} }