@article{mabrito_2013, title={Are expressivists guilty of wishful thinking?}, volume={165}, ISSN={["0031-8116"]}, DOI={10.1007/s11098-012-0003-8}, number={3}, journal={PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES}, author={Mabrito, Robert}, year={2013}, month={Sep}, pages={1069–1081} }
 @article{mabrito_2013, title={ON SOME RECENT ATTEMPTS TO RESOLVE THE DEBATE BETWEEN INTERNALISTS AND EXTERNALISTS}, volume={51}, ISSN={["0038-4283"]}, DOI={10.1111/sjp.12013}, abstractNote={An important debate in moral philosophy concerns the thesis of internalism, of which the characteristic idea is that there is a conceptual link between moral judgment and motivation. According to the internalist, to judge that something is right is to be motivated to do it (at least under certain conditions). Externalists are those who deny the truth of internalism. There are two ways that either party to this debate may argue for their preferred position. The indirect approach requires defending an account of moral judgment and showing (for internalists) that it entails there is a conceptual link between moral judgment and motivation or (for externalists) that it entails there is no such link. In contrast, the direct approach requires arguing in favor of one position without assuming any particular account of moral judgment. In this paper, I examine two attempts—one by Michael Smith and one by Sigrún Svavarsdóttir—to resolve this debate between internalists and externalists by using the direct approach. Smith attempts to do so in favor of internalism while Svavarsdóttir makes the attempt in favor of externalism. I conclude that both attempts fail.}, number={2}, journal={SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY}, author={Mabrito, Robert}, year={2013}, month={Jun}, pages={179–205} }
 @article{mabrito_2013, title={WELFARE AND PARADOX}, volume={38}, ISSN={["2153-7984"]}, DOI={10.5840/jpr20133815}, journal={JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH}, author={Mabrito, Robert}, year={2013}, pages={299–322} }
 @article{mabrito_2005, title={Does Shafer-Landau Have a Problem with Supervenience?}, volume={126}, ISSN={0031-8116 1573-0883}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S11098-005-2163-2}, DOI={10.1007/S11098-005-2163-2}, number={2}, journal={Philosophical Studies}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Mabrito, Robert}, year={2005}, month={Nov}, pages={297–311} }
 @misc{mabrito_2005, title={Moral realism: A defense}, volume={126}, number={2}, journal={Philosophical Studies (Dordrecht, Netherlands)}, author={Mabrito, R.}, year={2005}, pages={297–311} }