Rodney L. Engen

Gainey, R. R., Steen, S., & Engen, R. L. (2005). Exercising options: An assessment of the use of alternative sanctions for drug offenders. JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 22(4), 488–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820500219219

Steen, S., Engen, R. L., & Gainey, R. R. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. CRIMINOLOGY, 43(2), 435–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00013.x

Engen, R. L., Gainey, R. R., Crutchfield, R. D., & Weis, J. G. (2003). Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines: The role of departures and structured sentencing alternatives. CRIMINOLOGY, 41(1), 99–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00983.x

Engen, R. L., Steen, S., & Bridges, G. S. (2002). Racial Disparities in the Punishment of Youth: A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment of the Literature. Social Problems (Society for the Study of Social Problems), 49(2), 194–220.

Engen, R. L., & Gainey, R. R. (2000). Conceptualizing legally relevant factors under guidelines: A reply to Ulmer. CRIMINOLOGY, 38(4), 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb01421.x

Engen, R. L., & Gainey, R. R. (2000, November). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. CRIMINOLOGY, Vol. 38, pp. 1207–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb01419.x

Engen, R. L., & Steen, S. (2000). The power to punish: Discretion and sentencing reform in the war on drugs. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 105(5), 1357–1395. https://doi.org/10.1086/210433