Veljko Dubljevic

Cooperative behavior in the workplace: Empirical evidence from the agent-deed-consequences model of moral judgment

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 13.

Exploring and Understanding Law Enforcement’s Relationship with Technology: A Qualitative Interview Study of Police Officers in North Carolina

Applied Sciences.

Perceived Invasiveness and Therapeutic Acceptability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

AJOB Neuroscience.

Present and Emerging Ethical Issues with tDCS use: A Summary and Review

[Review of ]. NEUROETHICS, 16(1).

Autonomous Vehicles and the Basic Structure of Society

In R. Jenkins, D. Cerny, & T. Hribek (Eds.), Autonomous Vehicle Ethics, The Trolley Problem and Beyond. Oxford University Press.

Diversifying the Bioethics Funding Landscape: The Case of TMS

Dubljevic, V., Young, J. R., & Appelbaum, L. G. (2022, January 2). AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, Vol. 22, pp. 28–30.

Ethics in human–AI teaming: principles and perspectives

AI and Ethics.

Media portrayal of ethical and social issues in brain organoid research

PHILOSOPHY ETHICS AND HUMANITIES IN MEDICINE, 17(1).

Moral and social ramifications of autonomous vehicles: a qualitative study of the perceptions of professional drivers

Behaviour & Information Technology, 5, 1–8.

Morality, Risk-Taking and Psychopathic Tendencies: An Empirical Study

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 13.

Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement

[Review of ]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY PRACTICE, 7, 146–165.

Surveying Ethics: a Measurement Model of Preference for Precepts Implied in Moral Theories (PPIMT)

REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY, 13(1), 197–214.

The Socio-Political Roles of Neuroethics and the Case of Klotho

AJOB Neuroscience, 4, 1–13.

The public impact of academic and print media portrayals of TMS: shining a spotlight on discrepancies in the literature

BMC Medical Ethics, 23(1).

The ubiquity of the fallacy of composition in cognitive enhancement and in education

Edgren, N., & Dubljevic, V. (2022, October 23). THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, Vol. 10.

Using Algorithms to Make Ethical Judgements: METHAD vs. the ADC Model

Coin, A., & Dubljevic, V. (2022, July 3). AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, Vol. 22, pp. 41–43.

Carebots for Eldercare: Technology, Ethics, and Implications

In C. S. Nam & J. Lyons (Eds.), Trust in Human-Robot Interactions (pp. 553–569).

Living with Dementia: Neuroethical Issues and International Perspectives

Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

The Authenticity of Machine-Augmented Human Intelligence: Therapy, Enhancement, and the Extended Mind

Neuroethics, 14(2), 283–290.

The Normative Implications of Recent Empirical Neuroethics Research on Moral Intuitions

NEUROETHICS, 14(3), 449–457.

The complex nature of willpower and conceptual mapping of its normative significance in research on stress, addiction, and dementia

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44.

Toward a rational and ethical sociotechnical system of autonomous vehicles: A novel application of multi-criteria decision analysis

PLOS ONE, 16(8), e0256224.

AI in the headlines: the portrayal of the ethical issues of artificial intelligence in the media

AI & SOCIETY, 35(4), 927–936.

Disease and wellness across the lifespan: A global perspective on the mental health burden of dementia

In Global Mental Health and Neuroethics (pp. 225–235).

Ethical Aspects of BCI Technology: What Is the State of the Art?

Philosophies, 5(4), 31.

How Public Opinion Can Inform Cognitive Enhancement Regulation

AJOB Neuroscience.

Neuroenhancement at work: Addressing the ethical, legal and social implications

In J. Trempe-Martineau & E. Racine (Eds.), Organizational Neuroethics (pp. 87–103).

The Principle of Autonomy and Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 17(2), 271–282.

Toward Implementing the ADC Model of Moral Judgment in Autonomous Vehicles

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 26(5), 2461–2472.

Toward Implementing the Agent-Deed-Consequence Model of Moral Judgment in Autonomous Vehicles

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. Presented at the AIES '20: AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society.

A Proposal for a Reconstruction of the Concept of Autonomy

NEUROETHICS, JUSTICE AND AUTONOMY: PUBLIC REASON IN THE COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT DEBATE, Vol. 19, pp. 27–41.

AI Assistants and the Paradox of Internal Automaticity

Neuroethics, 13(3), 303–310.

Are There Problems with the Economic Disincentives Model of Regulation?

NEUROETHICS, JUSTICE AND AUTONOMY: PUBLIC REASON IN THE COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT DEBATE, Vol. 19, pp. 109–122.

Cognitive Enhancement and the Problem of the Pressure to Enhance: Rational Choice Modeling and Normative Justification

NEUROETHICS, JUSTICE AND AUTONOMY: PUBLIC REASON IN THE COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT DEBATE, Vol. 19, pp. 13–25.

Is the Proposal of the Political Notion of Autonomy Problematic?

NEUROETHICS, JUSTICE AND AUTONOMY: PUBLIC REASON IN THE COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT DEBATE, Vol. 19, pp. 87–108.

Legitimate Public Policies on Electro-magnetic Cognitive Enhancements

NEUROETHICS, JUSTICE AND AUTONOMY: PUBLIC REASON IN THE COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT DEBATE, Vol. 19, pp. 65–83.

Neuroconsumerism and Comprehensive Neuroethics

AJOB Neuroscience, 10(4), 185–187.

Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate

In NEUROETHICS, JUSTICE AND AUTONOMY: PUBLIC REASON IN THE COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT DEBATE (Vol. 19, pp. 1–138).

Neuropharmacology, Addiction and Autonomy: A Proposal for Public Policy on Adderall and Ritalin as Pharmacological Enhancements

NEUROETHICS, JUSTICE AND AUTONOMY: PUBLIC REASON IN THE COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT DEBATE, Vol. 19, pp. 45–63.

Pediatric Neuro-enhancement, Best Interest, and Autonomy: A Case of Normative Reversal

In Advances in Neuroethics (pp. 199–212).

Psychiatric Neuroethics-Studies in Research and Practice

Dubljevic, V. (2019, October). BIOETHICS, Vol. 33, pp. 974–975.

Public Reason and Reasonable Conceptions of Justice

Sofia Philosophical Review, 12(1), 24–46.

The Application of Rawlsian Principles of Justice on Cognition-Enhancement Drugs: A Policy Proposal

NEUROETHICS, JUSTICE AND AUTONOMY: PUBLIC REASON IN THE COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT DEBATE, Vol. 19, pp. 3–12.

Advances in Neuroethics (Book Series)

Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment

PLOS ONE, 13(10), e0204631.

Moral Enhancement - And the Opposite: Making People More or Less Moral

The Impact of a Landmark Neuroscience Study on Free Will: A Qualitative Analysis of Articles Using Libet and Colleagues' Methods

AJOB Neuroscience, 9(1), 29–41.

Toward an Improved Multi-Criteria Drug Harm Assessment Process and Evidence-Based Drug Policies

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9.

Behavioral and brain-based research on free moral agency: Threatening or empowering?

In J. Illes (Ed.), Neuroethics: Anticipating the Future (pp. 388–410).

CAN NEUROSCIENCE CONTRIBUTE TO PRACTICAL ETHICS? A CRITICAL REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF THE METHODOLOGICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL CHALLENGES OF THE NEUROSCIENCE OF ETHICS

BIOETHICS, 31(5), 328–337.

Is It Time to Abandon the Strong Interpretation of the Dual-Process Model in Neuroethics?

In Debates About Neuroethics (pp. 129–140).

Moral enhancement meets normative and empirical reality: Assessing the practical feasibility of moral enhancement neurotechnologies

Bioethics, 31(5), 338–348.

NEUROETHICS: NEUROSCIENCE'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO BIOETHICS

Dubljevic, V., Jox, R. J., & Racine, E. (2017, June). BIOETHICS, Vol. 31, pp. 326–327.

To Disclose or Not to Disclose: When Fear of Nocebo Effects Infringes Upon Autonomy

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, Vol. 17, pp. 50–52.

tDCS for Memory Enhancement: Analysis of the Speculative Aspects of Ethical Issues

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10.

21 Selected Abstracts from the Montreal Neuroethics Conference for Young Researchers

Neuroethics, 9(2), 137–145.

Autonomy is Political, Pragmatic, and Postmetaphysical: A Reply to Open Peer Commentaries on “Autonomy in Neuroethics”

Autonomy is Political, Pragmatic, and Postmetaphysical: A Reply to Open Peer Commentaries on “Autonomy in Neuroethics.” AJOB Neuroscience, 7(4), W1–W3.

Cognitive Enhancement: Ethical and Policy Implications in International Perspectives

New York: Oxford University Press.

Enhancement with Modafinil: Benefiting or harming the society?

In F. Jotterand & V. Dubljević (Eds.), Cognitive Enhancement: Ethical and Policy Implications in International Perspectives (pp. 259–274). New York: Oxford University Press.

Media Portrayal of a Landmark Neuroscience Experiment on Free Will

Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(4), 989–1007.

Neuroethics: Neuroscience and Society

In Oxford Handbooks Online – Philosophy.

Porous or Contextualized Autonomy? Knowledge Can Empower Autonomous Moral Agents

The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(2), 48–50.

The Bright Future of Neuroethics

Neuroethics, 9(2), 103–105.

Cognitive Enhancement

Cognitive Enhancement, pp. 343–365.

Cognitive enhancement with methylphenidate and modafinil: conceptual advances and societal implications

Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics, 8, 25.

Cognitive enhancement: A glance at the future and ethical considerations

In S. Knafo & C. Venero (Eds.), Cognitive Enhancement (pp. 343–365). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Lost in Interpretation: Autonomy and What Patients Tell Versus What Is Inferred

The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(9), 28–30.

Regulation of cognition enhancement drugs and public reason: prohibition or economic disincentives model?

In R. Ranisch, S. Schuol, & M. Rockoff (Eds.), Human Self-design with Biotechnology, (Tübingen Studies in Ethics) (pp. 289–304). Tübingen: Francke Attempto Verlag.

What is Cognitive Enhancement?

Cognitive Enhancement, pp. 1–9.

A single cognitive heuristic process meets the complexity of domain-specific moral heuristics

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(5), 487–488.

Cognitive Enhancement and Academic Misconduct: A Study Exploring Their Frequency and Relationship

Ethics & Behavior, 24(5), 408–420.

Ethics challenges of transition from paediatric to adult health care services for young adults with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

Paediatrics & Child Health, 19(2), 65–68. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/24596475

How Neuroethics differs from Bioethics, and does it matter?

In D. Franeta & A. Protopapadakis (Eds.), Primenjena etika (pp. 52–85). Novi Sad: Mediterran.

Neurostimulation Devices for Cognitive Enhancement: Toward a Comprehensive Regulatory Framework

Neuroethics, 8(2), 115–126.

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Prohibition or Coffee Shops: Regulation of Amphetamine and Methylphenidate for Enhancement Use by Healthy Adults”

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Prohibition or Coffee Shops: Regulation of Amphetamine and Methylphenidate for Enhancement Use by Healthy Adults.” The American Journal of Bioethics, 14(1), W1–W8.

The ADC of Moral Judgment: Opening the Black Box of Moral Intuitions With Heuristics About Agents, Deeds, and Consequences

AJOB Neuroscience, 5(4), 3–20.

The Rising Tide of tDCS in the Media and Academic Literature

Neuron, 82(4), 731–736.

Autonomy in Neuroethics: Political and Not Metaphysical

AJOB Neuroscience, 4(4), 44–51.

Judging Deeds, Not Psychopaths

AJOB Neuroscience, 4(2), 33–34.

Nudging Without Ethical Fudging: Clarifying Physician Obligations to Avoid Ethical Compromise

The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(6), 18–19.

Prohibition or Coffee Shops: Regulation of Amphetamine and Methylphenidate for Enhancement Use by Healthy Adults

The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(7), 23–33.

“Clock Shock,” Motivational Enhancement, and Performance Maintenance in Adderall Use

AJOB Neuroscience, 4(1), 13–14.

Cognitive Enhancement, Rational Choice and Justification

Neuroethics, 6(1), 179–187.

How to understand Rawls's Law of Peoples

Studies in Social and Political Thought, 20(1), 85–105.

Principles of Justice as the Basis for Public Policy on Psychopharmacological Cognitive Enhancement

Law, Inn Tech, 4(1), 67–83.

The difference between justice and legitimacy as the basis for an interpretation of Rawls' Law of Peoples

Političke Perspektive, 4(1), 45–71.

Toward a Legitimate Public Policy on Cognition-Enhancement Drugs

AJOB Neuroscience, 3(3), 29–33.

Habermas’s criticism of “Justice as Fairness” and Rawls's distinction of four roles for political philosophy

Nauka i Politika, 5(2), 195–204.

Morality, religion and the political culture of tolerance

Religion and Tolerance, 9(16), 245–256.

Discourse ethics of Jürgen Habermas in relation to contemporary science

Interdisciplinarnost i Jedinstvo Savremene Nauke, 4(2), 133–142.

The application of Categorical Imperative

In Evropska zajednica naroda i univerzalne vrednosti (pp. 127–147). Novi Sad: NATEF.

The application of utilitarian analysis

Poslovna Ekonomija, 2(1), 151–167.

The formulation and reformulation of Rawls's idea of public reason

Pravni Život, 14, 737–758.

Legitimacy and the economic model of pluralist democracy

Poslovna Ekonomija, 1(2), 200–218.

Students' handbook for university entrance exam

(3rd ed.). Sremska Kamenica: Educons University Press.

The philosophy of law of Jürgen Habermas

Pravni Život, 12, 595–609.

How to interpret Habermas’ critique of "Justice as Fairness"

Pravni Život, 10, 335–356.

Students' handbook for university entrance exam

(2nd ed.). Sremska Kamenica: Educons University Press.

Students' handbook for university entrance exam

Sremska Kamenica: Educons University Press.

The application of “Justice as Fairness” through notions of the rational and the reasonable

Pravni Život, 8, 399–414.

Organizational justice

Žurnal Za Sociologiju, 4(1), 76–85.

Morality and religion

In Religije Balkana: Iskustva i perpektive (pp. 180–183). Begrade: Belgrade Open School.

Philosophy and modern science

In Filozofija – problemski pristup (pp. 140–143). Novi Sad: SSFF.

Problems in methodology of teaching philosophy

In Filozofija – problemski pristup (pp. 206–210). Novi Sad: SSFF.

Socrates

In Filozofija – problemski pristup (pp. 34–44). Novi Sad: SSFF.