TY - SOUND TI - The Welfare Significance of General Equilibrium Supply and Demand Curves AU - Thurman, Walter N. DA - 1990/9// PY - 1990/9// ER - TY - SOUND TI - The Economic Effects of Transferability Restrictions on Tobacco Quota AU - Rucker, Randal R. AU - Thurman, Walter N. AU - Sumner, Daniel A. DA - 1990/8// PY - 1990/8// ER - TY - JOUR TI - The Economic Effects of Supply Controls: The Simple Analytics of the U. S. Peanut Program AU - Rucker, Randal R. AU - Thurman, Walter N. T2 - The Journal of Law and Economics AB - Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Economic Effects of Supply Controls: The Simple Analytics of the U. S. Peanut ProgramRandal R. Rucker, and Walter N. ThurmanRandal R. Rucker Search for more articles by this author , and Walter N. Thurman Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 33, Number 2Oct., 1990 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467215 Views: 25Total views on this site Citations: 17Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1990 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Boris Begović Pedeset godina ekonomske teorije regulacije, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 69, no.33 (Sep 2021): 691–705.https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21308AANDREW SCHMITZ, DWAYNE HAYNES, TROY G. SCHMITZ THE NOT-SO-SIMPLE ECONOMICS OF PRODUCTION QUOTA BUYOUTS, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 48, no.22 (May 2016): 119–147.https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2016.5David R. Just, Jaclyn D. Kropp Production Incentives from Static Decoupling: Land Use Exclusion Restrictions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95, no.55 (Aug 2013): 1049–1067.https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat060Janet G. Peckham, Jaclyn D. Kropp Decoupled Direct Payments under Base Acreage and Yield Updating Uncertainty: An Investigation of Agricultural Chemical Use, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 41, no.22 (Sep 2016): 158–174.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500003324Daniel A. Sumner, Julian M. Alston, Joseph W. Glauber Evolution of the Economics of Agricultural Policy, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92, no.22 (Apr 2010): 403–423.https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaq015Harry Gorter, David R. Just, Jaclyn D. Kropp Cross‐subsidization Due to Inframarginal Support in Agriculture: A General Theory and Empirical Evidence, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90, no.11 (Feb 2008): 42–54.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01044.xDong (Dan) Lee, Thomas E. Borcherding Public Choice of Tax and Regulatory Instruments—The Role of Heterogeneity, Public Finance Review 34, no.66 (Aug 2016): 607–636.https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142106291501John Beghin, Ndiame Diop, Holger Matthey Groundnut trade liberalization: Could the South help the south?, World Development 34, no.66 (Jun 2006): 1016–1036.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.003Dae-Seob Lee, P. Lynn Kennedy, Stanley M. Fletcher An Analysis of Latin American Peanut Trade, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 38, no.0101 (Apr 2015): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800022033Nancy H. Chau, Harry Gorter Disentangling the Consequences of Direct Payment Schemes in Agriculture on Fixed Costs, Exit Decisions, and Output, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87, no.55 (Dec 2005): 1174–1181.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00804.xT. Jeffrey Price, Marshall C. Lamb, Michael E. Wetzstein Technology choice under changing peanut policies, Agricultural Economics 33, no.11 (Jun 2005): 11–19.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2005.00233.x Mary K. Muth , Randal R. Rucker , Walter N. Thurman , and Ching‐Ta Chuang The Fable of the Bees Revisited: Causes and Consequences of the U.S. Honey Program Muth/Rucker/Thurman/Chuang, The Journal of Law and Economics 46, no.22 (Jul 2015): 479–516.https://doi.org/10.1086/377290Julian M. Alston, Jennifer S. James Chapter 33 The incidence of agricultural policy, (Jan 2002): 1689–1749.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(02)10020-XRichard J. Sexton, Nathalie Lavoie Chapter 15 Food processing and distribution: An industrial organization approach, (Jan 2001): 863–932.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(01)10023-XRodolfo M. Nayga, Robert B. Borges Trade and the Political Economy of Agricultural Policy: The Case of the United States Peanut Program, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27, no.22 (Apr 2015): 595–612.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800028625 Randal R. Rucker , Walter N. Thurman , and Daniel A. Sumner Restricting the Market for Quota: An Analysis of Tobacco Production Rights with Corroboration from Congressional Testimony, Journal of Political Economy 103, no.11 (Oct 2015): 142–175.https://doi.org/10.1086/261979Walter N. Thurman The Welfare Significance and Nonsignificance of General Equilibrium Demand and Supply Curves, Public Finance Quarterly 21, no.44 (Aug 2016): 449–469.https://doi.org/10.1177/109114219302100406 DA - 1990/10// PY - 1990/10// DO - 10.1086/467215 VL - 33 IS - 2 SP - 483-515 ER - TY - JOUR TI - Relative Prices AU - Thurman, Walter N. T2 - N.C. State Economist DA - 1990/3// PY - 1990/3// VL - 3 N1 - newspaper article RN - newspaper article ER - TY - JOUR TI - CALIBRATION OF OPTION-BASED PROBABILITY ASSESSMENTS IN AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY-MARKETS AU - FACKLER, PL AU - KING, RP T2 - AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AB - Abstract A method for evaluating the reliability of option‐based price probability assessments is developed based on the calibration concept. Empirical tests using goodness‐of‐fit criteria are applied to four agricultural commodities. Results suggest that assessments in the corn and live cattle markets are reliable, but such assessments overstate the volatility of soybean prices and understate the location of hog prices. DA - 1990/2// PY - 1990/2// DO - 10.2307/1243146 VL - 72 IS - 1 SP - 73-83 SN - 0002-9092 ER -