Accounting - 2004 Arens, A., Beasley, M. S., & Elder, R. (2004). Overview of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 with Other Changes in Auditing and the Public Accounting Profession. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Beasley, M. S. (2004). Enterprise Risk Management: A Look at COSO’s Proposed Framework. The Wisconsin CPA, 8(7), 23–24. Beasley, M. S., & Hermanson, D. (2004). Audit Committees: Smart Questions and Smart Answers. Corporate Board, 25(149), 7–11. Beasley, M. S., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). Going Beyond Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance: Five Keys to Creating Value. The CPA Journal, LXXIV(6), 11–13. Beasley, M. S., Bradford, M., & Pagach, D. (2004). Outsourcing? At Your Own Risk. Strategic Finance, LXXXVI(1), 23–29. Taylor, E. Z. (2004). The Effect of Incentives on Knowledge Sharing in Computer-mediated Communication. Proceedings of the AAA IS Section Midyear Conference. Clearwater, Florida. Ravenscroft, S., & Williams, P. F. (2004). Considering accounting education in the USA post-Enron. Accounting Education, 13(supplement 1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928042000310760 Williams, P. F. (2004). A reply to commentaries on Recovering accounting as a worthy endeavor. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4-5), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00045-5 Williams, P. F. (2004). Recovering accounting as a worthy endeavor. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4-5), 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00041-8 Williams, P. F. (2004). You reap what you sow: the ethical discourse of professional accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(6-7), 995–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2003.04.003 Beasley, M. S., & Carcello, J. V. (2004). 2005 Miller GAAS guide : a comprehensive restatement of standards for auditing, attestation, compilation, and review. Chicago: CCH. Inc. Krawczyk, K. A., & Wright, R. M. (2004). Dividends and capital gains planning after the 2003 tax act. The CPA Journal, 74(10), 36. Peace, R. L., & Branson, B. (2004). New income tax regulations may affect bank tax accounting. Banking Law Journal. Reiter, S. A., & Williams, P. F. (2004). The philosophy and rhetoric of auditor independence concepts. BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 14(3), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200414329 Brazel, J. F., Agoglia, C. R., & Hatfield, R. C. (2004). Electronic versus face-to-face review: The effects of alternative forms of review on auditors' performance. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 79(4), 949–966. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.949