TY - JOUR TI - Online resource utilization in a hybrid course in engineering graphics AU - Wiebe, E.N. AU - Branoff, T.J. AU - Shreve, M.A. T2 - Advances in Engineering Education DA - 2011/// PY - 2011/// VL - 2 IS - 3 UR - https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076058 ER - TY - JOUR TI - Comparing visual representations of DNA in two multimedia presentations AU - Cook, M. AU - Wiebe, E. AU - Carter, G. T2 - Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia DA - 2011/// PY - 2011/// VL - 20 IS - 1 SP - 21–42 ER - TY - JOUR TI - How students use online instructional resources in a blended instruction introductory engineering graphics course AU - Branoff, T. AU - Wiebe, E. AU - Shreve, M. T2 - Journal of Geometry and Graphics DA - 2011/// PY - 2011/// VL - 15 IS - 2 SP - 213–223 ER - TY - RPRT TI - Evaluation of Virtual Computing Lab in Community Colleges: Fall and Spring 2010 AU - London, J. AU - Wiebe, E.N. A3 - The Friday Institute DA - 2011/// PY - 2011/// M3 - Research Report PB - The Friday Institute ER - TY - JOUR TI - BioMusic in the Classroom: Interdisciplinary Elementary Science and Music Curriculum Development AU - Carrier, Sarah AU - Wiebe, Eric N. AU - Gray, Patricia AU - Teachout, David T2 - School Science and Mathematics AB - School Science and MathematicsVolume 111, Issue 8 p. 425-434 BioMusic in the Classroom: Interdisciplinary Elementary Science and Music Curriculum Development Sarah Carrier, Sarah Carrier North Carolina State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorEric N. Wiebe, Eric N. Wiebe North Carolina State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorPatricia Gray, Patricia Gray University of North Carolina GreensboroSearch for more papers by this authorDavid Teachout, David Teachout University of North Carolina GreensboroSearch for more papers by this author Sarah Carrier, Sarah Carrier North Carolina State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorEric N. Wiebe, Eric N. Wiebe North Carolina State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorPatricia Gray, Patricia Gray University of North Carolina GreensboroSearch for more papers by this authorDavid Teachout, David Teachout University of North Carolina GreensboroSearch for more papers by this author First published: 05 December 2011 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00116.xCitations: 4Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume111, Issue8December 2011Pages 425-434 RelatedInformation DA - 2011/12// PY - 2011/12// DO - 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00116.x VL - 111 IS - 8 SP - 425-434 LA - en OP - SN - 0036-6803 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00116.x DB - Crossref ER - TY - JOUR TI - The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research AU - Behrend, Tara S. AU - Sharek, David J. AU - Meade, Adam W. AU - Wiebe, Eric N. T2 - Behavior Research Methods AB - Online contract labor portals (i.e., crowdsourcing) have recently emerged as attractive alternatives to university participant pools for the purposes of collecting survey data for behavioral research. However, prior research has not provided a thorough examination of crowdsourced data for organizational psychology research. We found that, as compared with a traditional university participant pool, crowdsourcing respondents were older, were more ethnically diverse, and had more work experience. Additionally, the reliability of the data from the crowdsourcing sample was as good as or better than the corresponding university sample. Moreover, measurement invariance generally held across these groups. We conclude that the use of these labor portals is an efficient and appropriate alternative to a university participant pool, despite small differences in personality and socially desirable responding across the samples. The risks and advantages of crowdsourcing are outlined, and an overview of practical and ethical guidelines is provided. DA - 2011/3/25/ PY - 2011/3/25/ DO - 10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0 VL - 43 IS - 3 SP - 800-813 J2 - Behav Res LA - en OP - SN - 1554-3528 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0 DB - Crossref KW - Crowdsourcing KW - Mechanical Turk KW - Industrial/organizational psychology KW - Survey research KW - Sampling KW - Personality ER - TY - JOUR TI - Cloud computing adoption and usage in community colleges AU - Behrend, Tara S. AU - Wiebe, Eric N. AU - London, Jennifer E. AU - Johnson, Emily C. T2 - Behaviour & Information Technology AB - Cloud computing is gaining popularity in higher education settings, but the costs and benefits of this tool have gone largely unexplored. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors that lead to technology adoption in a higher education setting. Specifically, we examined a range of predictors and outcomes relating to the acceptance of a cloud computing platform in rural and urban community colleges. Drawing from the Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM3) (Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H., 2008. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39 (2), 273–315), we build on the literature by examining both the actual usage and future intentions; further, we test the direct and indirect effects of a range of predictors on these outcomes. Approximately 750 community college students enrolled in basic computing skills courses participated in this study; findings demonstrated that background characteristics such as the student's ability to travel to campus had influenced the usefulness perceptions, while ease of use was largely determined by first-hand experiences with the platform, and instructor support. We offer recommendations for community college administrators and others who seek to incorporate cloud computing in higher education settings. DA - 2011/3// PY - 2011/3// DO - 10.1080/0144929x.2010.489118 VL - 30 IS - 2 SP - 231-240 J2 - Behaviour & Information Technology LA - en OP - SN - 0144-929X 1362-3001 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2010.489118 DB - Crossref KW - cloud computing KW - Technology Acceptance Model KW - higher education KW - community college KW - educational technology ER - TY - JOUR TI - Conceptualizing Magnification and Scale: The Roles of Spatial Visualization and Logical Thinking AU - Jones, M. Gail AU - Gardner, Grant AU - Taylor, Amy R. AU - Wiebe, Eric AU - Forrester, Jennifer T2 - Research in Science Education DA - 2011/5// PY - 2011/5// DO - 10.1007/s11165-010-9169-2 VL - 41 IS - 3 SP - 357–368 SN - 0157-244X 1573-1898 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9169-2 KW - Magnification KW - Biology KW - Science education KW - Middle school ER -