2023 journal article

Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020

PEERJ, 11.

By: T. Gin n, E. Petzold*, D. Uthappa *, C. Neighbors *, A. Borough*, C. Gin n, E. Lashnits* , G. Sempowski * ...

author keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; SARS-CoV-2; Dogs; Cats; Antibody; Serology
TL;DR: Raw ELISA results scrutinized relative to known negative samples suggested that cut-off for IgG seropositivity may require adjustment relative to previously proposed values, while proposed cut-offs for IgM require more extensive validation. (via Semantic Scholar)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: November 27, 2023

We collected oral and/or rectal swabs and serum from dogs and cats living in homes with SARS-CoV-2-PCR-positive persons for SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology testing. Pre-COVID-19 serum samples from dogs and cats were used as negative controls, and samples were tested in duplicate at different timepoints. Raw ELISA results scrutinized relative to known negative samples suggested that cut-offs for IgG seropositivity may require adjustment relative to previously proposed values, while proposed cut-offs for IgM require more extensive validation. A small number of pet dogs (2/43, 4.7%) and one cat (1/21, 4.8%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and 28.6 and 37.5% of cats and dogs were positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, respectively.