2019 journal article

Lower-Leaf Removal and Nitrogen Application Programs for Flue-Cured Tobacco Production

AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 111(4), 1933–1939.

By: C. Finch n, M. Vann n, L. Fisher n, R. Wells n & A. Brown n

UN Sustainable Development Goal Categories
2. Zero Hunger (Web of Science)
3. Good Health and Well-being (OpenAlex)
13. Climate Action (Web of Science)
14. Life Below Water (Web of Science)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: August 5, 2019

Core Ideas Lower‐leaf removal will reduce cured leaf yield but can reduce the portion of lower‐demand stalk positionsNitrogen application after leaf removal is of limited value and is currently discouragedIf these programs are to find commercial success, a higher selling price should be offered by leaf purchasers With a current global over‐supply of flue‐cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.), tobacco producers in North Carolina have been encouraged to remove the lowermost leaves prior to harvest due to their low value in manufactured products. The objective of this research was to compare lower‐leaf removal programs. Research was conducted in 2016 and 2017 to quantify the agronomic effects of three lower‐leaf removal programs (0, 4, and 8 leaves plant−1) and the subsequent delivery of four N application rates (0, 5.6, 11.2, and 16.9 kg N ha−1 above base recommendation). All treatments combinations were applied during the early flowering stage of growth (8–10 wk after transplanting), when plants were approximately 120 cm tall. Programs absent of leaf removal generally produced the highest cured leaf yield. The addition of 16.9 kg N ha−1 increased yield when compared to lower N application rates within the 4‐leaf removal program. Nitrogen application did not affect yield in the 8‐leaf removal program. Cured leaf value was greatest in the 0‐leaf removal program (USD $10,131 ha−1) and was reduced in the 4‐ and 8‐leaf programs by $1611 and $2645 ha−1, respectively. Lower‐stalk positions were nearly eliminated in the 8‐leaf removal program, while the 4‐leaf removal program reduced their presence by more than 50%. Ultimately, if these programs are to be encouraged or required by industry, the removal of four leaves per plant proved to be more practical when paired with additional N, due to moderate yield reduction and lower‐stalk leaf production.