2020 journal article

A comparison of cost and quality of three methods for estimating density for wild pig (Sus scrofa)

Scientific Reports, 10(1).

MeSH headings : Animals; Animals, Wild / physiology; DNA / isolation & purification; Ecological Parameter Monitoring / economics; Ecological Parameter Monitoring / methods; Feces / chemistry; Introduced Species / statistics & numerical data; Population Density; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / economics; South Carolina; Sus scrofa / physiology; Video Recording / economics
TL;DR: A decision tree is provided for researchers to help make monitoring decisions by comparing cost effectiveness of three common population estimation methods to wild pigs across three habitats in South Carolina, U.S.A. (via Semantic Scholar)
UN Sustainable Development Goal Categories
15. Life on Land (OpenAlex)
Source: Crossref
Added: April 16, 2021

Abstract