2020 journal article

Unit cohesion during deployment and post-deployment mental health: is cohesion an individual- or unit-level buffer for combat-exposed soldiers?

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 52(1), 121–131.

By: L. Campbell-Sills*, P. Flynn n, K. Choi*, T. Ng*, P. Aliaga*, C. Broshek*, S. Jain*, R. Kessler* ...

author keywords: Depression; military personnel; multilevel analysis; post-traumatic stress disorder; protective factors; psychological resilience; risk factors; suicidal ideation
MeSH headings : Humans; Military Personnel / psychology; Mental Health; Afghan Campaign 2001-; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / psychology; Suicidal Ideation; Risk Factors
TL;DR: Policy and interventions that enhance horizontal cohesion may protect combat-exposed units against post-deployment mental health problems and efforts to support individual soldiers who report low levels of horizontal or vertical cohesion may also yield mental health benefits. (via Semantic Scholar)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: January 3, 2022

AbstractBackgroundUnit cohesion may protect service member mental health by mitigating effects of combat exposure; however, questions remain about the origins of potential stress-buffering effects. We examined buffering effects associated with two forms of unit cohesion (peer-oriented horizontal cohesion and subordinate-leader vertical cohesion) defined as either individual-level or aggregated unit-level variables.MethodsLongitudinal survey data from US Army soldiers who deployed to Afghanistan in 2012 were analyzed using mixed-effects regression. Models evaluated individual- and unit-level interaction effects of combat exposure and cohesion during deployment on symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and suicidal ideation reported at 3 months post-deployment (model n's = 6684 to 6826). Given the small effective sample size (k = 89), the significance of unit-level interactions was evaluated at a 90% confidence level.ResultsAt the individual-level, buffering effects of horizontal cohesion were found for PTSD symptoms [B = −0.11, 95% CI (−0.18 to −0.04), p < 0.01] and depressive symptoms [B = −0.06, 95% CI (−0.10 to −0.01), p < 0.05]; while a buffering effect of vertical cohesion was observed for PTSD symptoms only [B = −0.03, 95% CI (−0.06 to −0.0001), p < 0.05]. At the unit-level, buffering effects of horizontal (but not vertical) cohesion were observed for PTSD symptoms [B = −0.91, 90% CI (−1.70 to −0.11), p = 0.06], depressive symptoms [B = −0.83, 90% CI (−1.24 to −0.41), p < 0.01], and suicidal ideation [B = −0.32, 90% CI (−0.62 to −0.01), p = 0.08].ConclusionsPolicies and interventions that enhance horizontal cohesion may protect combat-exposed units against post-deployment mental health problems. Efforts to support individual soldiers who report low levels of horizontal or vertical cohesion may also yield mental health benefits.