2016 personal communication
Response to critique on methods for studying the pressure applied by compression fabrics
Hegarty-Craver, M., Grant, E., Kravitz, S., & Reid, L. (2016, April).

Journal of Wound CareVol. 25, No. Sup4 CorrespondenceLetters — Response to critique on methods for studying the pressure applied by compression fabricsM. Hegarty-Craver, Edward Grant, S. Kravitz, L. ReidM. Hegarty-CraverSearch for more papers by this author, Edward GrantSearch for more papers by this author, S. KravitzSearch for more papers by this author, L. ReidSearch for more papers by this authorM. Hegarty-Craver; Edward Grant; S. Kravitz; L. ReidPublished Online:12 Apr 2016https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2016.25.Sup4.S26AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References 1 Hegarty-Craver M, Grant E et al.. Research into fabrics used in compression therapy and assessment of their impact on treatment regimens. J Wound Care 2014; 23: 9, APWH Supplement: S14–S22. Link, Google Scholar2 Hegarty-Craver M, Grant E, Kravitz S, Kwon C, Reid L. Simulated pressure changes in multilayer, multicomponent wrap systems when transitioning from rest to standing. J Wound Care 2015; 24: 9, APWH Supplement S14–S20. Link, Google Scholar3 Kravitz S, Hegarty-Craver M, Reid L. Challenging present concepts in compression therapy: static stiffness index is not consistent and not clinically relevant. J Wound Care 2016; 25: 2, North Am Suppl S4–S8. Link, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails 1 April 2016Volume 25Issue Sup4ISSN (print): 0969-0700ISSN (online): 2052-2916 Metrics History Published online 12 April 2016 Published in print 1 April 2016 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download