2024 journal article
The greenhouse gas performance of selected biodegradable and recalcitrant plastics in US landfills
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 19(6).
author keywords: polymer; biodegradability; climate change; landfill gas; carbon storage; energy recovery
iopscience.iop.org (publisher PDF)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: July 1, 2024
Abstract Biodegradable plastics are often considered to exhibit superior environmental performance compared to conventional recalcitrant plastics. Here, we assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of selected biodegradable and recalcitrant plastics made from both fossil and biogenic carbon (C) as disposed in a national average U.S. landfill. This average landfill incorporates consideration of size, precipitation, landfill gas management, and gas collection installation schedule. The GHG emissions of an 80% biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL f ) made from fossil C and a 2% biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) (PBS b ) made from biogenic C were evaluated to represent the range of anaerobic biodegradabilities. The 2% biodegradable PBS b has lower GHG emissions than the 80% biodegradable PCL f in the national average landfill. In the best case, which includes aggressive gas collection, conversion of gas to energy, and disposal in a large landfill, the PCL f results in 2,423 kg CO 2 e/mt, which is well above PBS b (-1,956 kg CO 2 e/mt), a hypothetical biogenic and 80% biodegradable PCL b (4,739 kg CO 2 e/mt), and recalcitrant fossil plastic (0 kg CO 2 e/mt). From a disposal perspective, a recalcitrant biogenic plastic is optimal given the long-term storage of carbon. This study informs the direction of materials research to develop materials that minimize their overall environmental footprint at end-of-life. From a GHG perspective, a slightly degradable biogenic plastic and a recalcitrant fossil-based plastic have lower GHG emissions than a biodegradable biogenic plastic when disposed in the average U.S. landfill.