2024 journal article

Evaluating the transferability of airborne laser scanning derived stem size prediction models for <i>Pinus taeda</i> L. stem size estimation to two different locations and acquisition specifications

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 45(16), 5267–5294.

By: M. Sumnall*, D. Carter*, T. Albaugh*, E. Platt*, T. Host*, R. Cook n, O. Campoe*, R. Rubilar*

author keywords: UAV; ALS; LIDAR; loblolly pine; ITC
UN Sustainable Development Goal Categories
15. Life on Land (Web of Science)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: July 30, 2024

Airborne laser scanning (ALS) datasets are used widely for estimating forest biometrics. The transferability of predictive models among ALS acquisitions is a topic of research due to differences in timing, flight parameters, equipment specifications, environmental conditions, and processing methods. The transferability of predictive models therefore is subject to uncertainty. This paper presents an evaluation of the transferability of models for the estimation of stem volume and diameter at breast height (DBH) based on individual tree crown size and competitive neighbourhood metrics derived for managed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii) forest in the Southern USA. Two predictive models types were tested: multiple linear regression (MLR) and Rand Forest (RF). We also evaluated the inclusion of additional training data to model development. Models were able to be transferred to other locations with similar structural and management conditions as the original training dataset with little decrease in accuracy, specifically unthinned stands, despite different ALS acquisitions (Plot stem volume: R2 0.7–0.8; NRMSE 10–12%; mean DBH: R2 0.4–0.7; NRMSE 10–17%; plot basal area: R2 0.7–0.8; NRMSE 12%). Increases in structural differences between the training and test data, driven by age or thinning status, introduced unacceptable levels of uncertainty (Stem volume: R2 0.4–0.7; NRMSE 12–16%; mean DBH: R2 0.4–0.5; NRMSE 18–20%; plot basal area: R2 0.5–0.6; NRMSE 22–40%). Generally, RF models most accuracy estimated DBH, and MLR for stem volume. Improvements to estimate accuracy can be achieved through the addition of relatively small datasets, representing features which were not present in the original data. ALS's ability to provide accurate and near-complete inventories of forests hold a great deal of potential for forest management. The existence of a transferable model that can be used across different acquisitions represents a saving in terms of cost and time, we would argue that future research is therefore warranted.