2019 journal article
Yield and Disease Resistance for Three Bacterial Wilt-resistant Tomato Rootstocks
HORTTECHNOLOGY, 29(3), 330–337.
author keywords: grafting; on-farm; Ralstonia solanacearum; Solanum lycopersicum; yield
TL;DR:
Compared the bacterial wilt resistance of three commercially available tomato rootstocks, which are purported to be resistant to bacterial wilts, rootstock-imparted resistance improved marketable yields by between 88% and 125% compared with the nongrafted plants, and there were no yield benefits to grafting with any of the three rootstocks.
(via Semantic Scholar)
journals.ashs.org (publisher PDF)
UN Sustainable Development Goal Categories
2. Zero Hunger
(Web of Science; OpenAlex)
13. Climate Action
(Web of Science)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: July 1, 2019
Interest and use of grafted tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in the United States continues to grow. Pioneered in Asia, herbaceous grafting is a commonly used cultural practice to manage many soilborne pathogens. Bacterial wilt (BW), caused by the pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum, is an aggressive soilborne pathogen that affects tomato grown in the southeastern United States. Traditional fumigation methods have limited effectiveness in the management of this pathogen. The present study was conducted to compare the bacterial wilt resistance of three commercially available tomato rootstocks, which are purported to be resistant to bacterial wilt: ‘Cheong Gang’, ‘RST-04-106-T’, and ‘Shield’. The determinate hybrid tomato ‘Red Mountain’, which is susceptible to bacterial wilt, was used as the scion and nongrafted control. Three locations were used over 2 years in North Carolina: an on-farm site with a history of bacterial wilt and two North Carolina Department of Agriculture Research Stations with no recent history of bacterial wilt. No disease symptoms were observed in any of the three grafted treatments, whereas the nongrafted controls showed between 30% and 80% disease incidence at the on-farm location. The resultant rootstock-imparted resistance improved marketable yields by between 88% and 125% compared with the nongrafted plants. When grown in locations lacking BW there were no yield benefits to grafting with any of the three rootstocks.