2020 journal article
Total injectable anesthesia of dogs and cats for remote location veterinary sterilization clinic
BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 16(1).
author keywords: sterilization; dog; cat; anesthesia; total injectable anesthesia
MeSH headings : Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists / administration & dosage; Anesthesia, Intravenous / veterinary; Anesthetics, Combined / administration & dosage; Animals; Cats / surgery; Dexmedetomidine / administration & dosage; Dogs / surgery; Ecuador; Female; Hydromorphone / administration & dosage; Imidazoles / administration & dosage; Ketamine / administration & dosage; Male; Meloxicam / administration & dosage; Orchiectomy / veterinary; Ovariectomy / veterinary; Pregnanediones
TL;DR:
Total injectable anesthesia can be accomplished for remote location sterilization clinics with minimal morbidity.
(via Semantic Scholar)
open access via doi.org (publisher)
UN Sustainable Development Goal Categories
3. Good Health and Well-being
(Web of Science)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: October 5, 2020
Abstract Background Sterilization clinics often occur in remote places where anesthesia machines and compressed oxygen are unavailable. This study describes the use of total injectable anesthesia in dogs and cats presented for sterilization in a remote location. Results A total of 100 animals were sterilized; 26 female cats (CF), 22 male cats (CM), 28 female dogs (DF), and 24 male dogs (DM). CF were anesthetized with dexmedetomidine (20 mcg/kg), ketamine (8 mg/kg) and hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg) IM. CM were anesthetized with dexmedetomidine (15 mcg/kg), ketamine (5 mg/kg) and hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg) IM. Insufficient anesthesia in cats was treated with alfaxalone (1 mg/kg) IM. All cats were administered meloxicam at 0.3 mg/kg SQ. DF were anesthetized with dexmedetomidine (15 mcg/kg), ketamine (7–10 mg/kg) and hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg) IM. DM were anesthetized with dexmedetomidine (15 mcg/kg), ketamine (5 mg/kg) and hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg) IM. All dogs had IV catheter and endotracheal tube placed. If SpO2 < 91%, ventilation was assisted with an Ambu bag. Insufficient anesthesia in dogs was treated with alfaxalone (1 mg/kg) IV. All dogs were administered meloxicam at 0.2 mg/kg SQ. Following surgery, atipamezole (0.05–0.1 mg/kg) IM was administered to any patient that did not have voluntary movement. All patients survived and were discharged. Less than 25% of cats and male dogs required supplemental anesthesia. Fifty seven percent of female dogs required supplemental anesthesia. More than 89% of patients (in any group) required atipamezole administration. One cat recovered with agitation and hyperthermia (41.1C/ 106F). Some dogs required ventilatory assistance to remain normoxemic while anesthetized. Conclusion Total injectable anesthesia can be accomplished for remote location sterilization clinics with minimal morbidity.