@misc{ma_hibbing_kim_reedy_yedidia_breuer_breuer_glasner_perna_kelman_et al._2007, title={Host range and molecular Phylogenies of the soft rot enterobacterial genera Pectobacterium and dickeya}, volume={97}, number={9}, journal={Phytopathology}, author={Ma, B. and Hibbing, M. E. and Kim, H. S. and Reedy, R. M. and Yedidia, I. and Breuer, J. and Breuer, J. and Glasner, J. D. and Perna, N. T. and Kelman, A. and et al.}, year={2007}, pages={1150–1163} }
 @article{kelman_peterson_2002, title={Contributions of plant scientists to the development of the germ theory of disease}, volume={4}, number={2}, journal={Microbes and Infection}, author={Kelman, A. and Peterson, P. D.}, year={2002}, pages={257–260} }
 @misc{kelman_sequeira_nester_2000, title={Early germinative ideas on the origins of infectious disease}, volume={289}, number={5485}, journal={Science}, author={Kelman, A. and Sequeira, L. and Nester, E. W.}, year={2000}, pages={1689–1690} }
 @article{cowling_kelman_1999, title={George Henry Hepting: Pioneer leader in forest pathology}, volume={37}, DOI={10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.19}, abstractNote={George Henry Hepting grew up in the city environment of Brooklyn, but early in his life developed a deep love and scientific interest in forestry. He became America's most skilled scientist in the theory and practice of forest pathology. He studied how long-lived forest trees, unlike most plants, cope with the long-term changes in their biological, physical, and chemical environments. He devoted his remarkably energetic life to learning, understanding, and teaching how trees survive disease stresses induced by biotic and abiotic agents—in forest nurseries, as individual trees, in young sapling stands, in naturally regenerated and planted stands, in old-growth forests, and in landscapes and watersheds. He focused his innovative spirit, curiosity, and high intelligence on seeking ways to use this un- derstanding to develop practical guidelines for management that can be used to decrease or minimize disease losses and deterioration of wood in service. From the research that he and his close co-workers completed have come many tangible benefits. Throughout his life, Hepting was devoted to maintaining the rich biolog- ical heritage of this country in its forests and wildlife resources, in national, state, and city parks, and trees in residential, commercial, and recreational landscapes— resources that are important, not only to the economic vitality, but also for the spirit and aesthetic quality of life in the United States.}, number={1999}, journal={Annual Review of Phytopathology}, author={Cowling, E. B. and Kelman, A.}, year={1999}, pages={19–28} }
 @article{tilghman_astin_brinkley_chilton_cummings_ehrenberg_fox_glenn_green_hans_et al._1998, title={Trends in the early careers of life scientists - Preface and executive summary}, volume={9}, number={11}, journal={Molecular Biology of the Cell}, author={Tilghman, S. and Astin, H. S. and Brinkley, W. and Chilton, M. D. and Cummings, M. P. and Ehrenberg, R. G. and Fox, M. F. and Glenn, K. and Green, P. J. and Hans, S. and et al.}, year={1998}, pages={3007–3015} }
 @article{kelman_cook_1996, title={The role of a competitive research grants program for agriculture, food, and natural resources}, volume={46}, ISSN={["0006-3568"]}, DOI={10.2307/1312931}, abstractNote={I n the past tour decadcs, peer re~ view has guided the allocation of the majority of the funds distributed co the seleneific community by the .:"\rational Institutes of Health (NIE) and the National Science foundation (NSF). The acceptance of the lise of peer review co identify research proposals of high quality has been one of thc major factors in establishing the preeminence of the United Stares in science, mathematies, and engineering. In 1978, the US Congress approved the establishment in the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) 01 a small ($15-million) national extramural peer rcvicw-based comperirive grants program, the Competitive Research Grants Office (eRGO). Thc initial objeetive of this program was to support basic research in high-priority areas in the plant sciences and in human nutrition. The program was increased ro $50 million in 1985 and also expanded to support research in the animal sciences and biotechnology. Thc abundance, and even surplus, of food in the United States presents a continuing political difficulty in justifying increased funding for agricultural research. The widely held publie pereeption is that the problems of food production ha ve been solved. However, beeause of a growiog world population, a declining natural resüuree base, the markcd decline in productivity of oeeanie fisheries, the need to reduee dcpendency on pesticides, and the decreased availability of water and productive cropland, agricultural research i s needed n ow, perha ps more than ever (Brown 1995, Fischer and Zuiches 1994). In part, this view refleets the need for agriculture to shift from a resource-based to a}, number={7}, journal={BIOSCIENCE}, author={Kelman, A and Cook, RJ}, year={1996}, pages={533–540} }
 @article{kelman_1995, title={Contributions of plant pathology to the biological sciences and industry}, volume={33}, journal={Annual Review of Phytopathology}, author={Kelman, A.}, year={1995}, pages={1} }