@article{gotsch_geiger_franco_goldstein_meinzer_hoffmann_2019, title={Allocation to leaf area and sapwood area affects water relations of co-occurring savanna and forest trees (vol 163, pg 291, 2010)}, volume={189}, ISSN={["1432-1939"]}, DOI={10.1007/s00442-018-04327-3}, abstractNote={The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The Electronic supplementary material (ESM) was accompanying this article by mistake.}, number={2}, journal={OECOLOGIA}, author={Gotsch, Sybil G. and Geiger, Erika L. and Franco, Augusto C. and Goldstein, Guillermo and Meinzer, Frederick C. and Hoffmann, William A.}, year={2019}, month={Feb}, pages={563–563} }
 @misc{hoffmann_geiger_gotsch_rossatto_silva_lau_haridasan_franco_2012, title={Ecological thresholds at the savanna-forest boundary: how plant traits, resources and fire govern the distribution of tropical biomes}, volume={15}, ISSN={["1461-0248"]}, DOI={10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01789.x}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={7}, journal={ECOLOGY LETTERS}, author={Hoffmann, William A. and Geiger, Erika L. and Gotsch, Sybil G. and Rossatto, Davi R. and Silva, Lucas C. R. and Lau, On Lee and Haridasan, M. and Franco, Augusto C.}, year={2012}, month={Jul}, pages={759–768} }
 @article{hoffmann_jaconis_mckinley_geiger_gotsch_franco_2012, title={Fuels or microclimate? Understanding the drivers of fire feedbacks at savanna-forest boundaries}, volume={37}, ISSN={["1442-9985"]}, DOI={10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02324.x}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={6}, journal={AUSTRAL ECOLOGY}, author={Hoffmann, William A. and Jaconis, Susany. and Mckinley, Kristen L. and Geiger, Erika L. and Gotsch, Sybil G. and Franco, Augusto C.}, year={2012}, month={Sep}, pages={634–643} }
 @article{geiger_gotsch_damasco_haridasan_franco_hoffmann_2011, title={Distinct roles of savanna and forest tree species in regeneration under fire suppression in a Brazilian savanna}, volume={22}, ISSN={["1654-1103"]}, DOI={10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01252.x}, abstractNote={Questions: Has fire suppression relaxed barriers to the exchange of species between savanna and forest? Do all species or a subset of species participate in this exchange? Would current vegetation structure persist if fire suppression were to cease? Location: A gallery forest edge in the Cerrado region of central Brazil that burned only once in the past 35 years. Methods: Density of tree seedlings, saplings and adults, leaf area index (LAI), tree basal area and diameter were surveyed in 12, 10m � 70m transects centred on and perpendicular to the forest‐savanna boundary. Community composition was assessed using non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS). Results: Basal area and LAI declined substantially from forest to savanna, with an associated shift in species composition. Savanna tree species were nearly absent in the forest, but accounted for the majority of stems in the savanna. In contrast, forest species comprised 14% of adults and more than one-third of juveniles in the savanna. Despite the high diversity of trees (85 species) in the forest, five species play a particularly large role in this initial phase of forest expansion. Reintroduction of fire, however, would result in widespread topkill of juveniles and the majority of adult forest trees, thereby interrupting the succession towards forest. Conclusions: After 35 years during which the site burned only once, the savanna still remains dominated by savanna species. Nevertheless, the dominance of forest juveniles in border and savanna tree communities suggests that with a continued policy of fire suppression, the forest will continue to expand.}, number={2}, journal={JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE}, author={Geiger, Erika L. and Gotsch, Sybil G. and Damasco, Gabriel and Haridasan, M. and Franco, Augusto C. and Hoffmann, William A.}, year={2011}, month={Apr}, pages={312–321} }
 @article{gotsch_geiger_franco_goldstein_meinzer_hoffmann_2010, title={Allocation to leaf area and sapwood area affects water relations of co-occurring savanna and forest trees}, volume={163}, ISSN={["1432-1939"]}, DOI={10.1007/s00442-009-1543-2}, abstractNote={Water availability is a principal factor limiting the distribution of closed-canopy forest in the seasonal tropics, suggesting that forest tree species may not be well adapted to cope with seasonal drought. We studied 11 congeneric species pairs, each containing one forest and one savanna species, to test the hypothesis that forest trees have a lower capacity to maintain seasonal homeostasis in water relations relative to savanna species. To quantify this, we measured sap flow, leaf water potential (Psi(L)), stomatal conductance (g (s)), wood density, and Huber value (sapwood area:leaf area) of the 22 study species. We found significant differences in the water relations of these two species types. Leaf area specific hydraulic conductance of the soil/root/leaf pathway (G (t)) was greater for savanna species than forest species. The lower G (t) of forest trees resulted in significantly lower Psi(L) and g (s) in the late dry season relative to savanna trees. The differences in G (t) can be explained by differences in biomass allocation of savanna and forest trees. Savanna species had higher Huber values relative to forest species, conferring greater transport capacity on a leaf area basis. Forest trees have a lower capacity to maintain homeostasis in Psi(L) due to greater allocation to leaf area relative to savanna species. Despite significant differences in water relations, relationships between traits such as wood density and minimum Psi(L) were indistinguishable for the two species groups, indicating that forest and savanna share a common axis of water-use strategies involving multiple traits.}, number={2}, journal={OECOLOGIA}, author={Gotsch, Sybil G. and Geiger, Erika L. and Franco, Augusto C. and Goldstein, Guillermo and Meinzer, Frederick C. and Hoffmann, William A.}, year={2010}, month={Jun}, pages={291–301} }