@article{graham_curran_weir_2000, title={Conditional genotypic probabilities for microsatellite loci}, volume={155}, number={4}, journal={Genetics}, author={Graham, J. and Curran, J. and Weir, B. S.}, year={2000}, pages={1973–1980} }
 @article{buckleton_curran_basten_2000, title={Evaluating the statistical significance of single band profiles in VNTR analyses}, volume={40}, number={1}, journal={Science and Justice}, author={Buckleton, J. and Curran, J. M. and Basten, C. J.}, year={2000}, pages={27–31} }
 @misc{curran_buckleton_triggs_1999, title={Commentary on  Koons RD,  Buscaglia J. The forensic significance of glass composition and refractive index measurements. J Forensic Sci 1999;44(3): 496-503.}, volume={44}, number={6}, journal={Journal of Forensic Sciences}, author={Curran, J. M. and Buckleton, J. S. and Triggs, C. M.}, year={1999}, pages={1324–1325} }
 @article{curran_robertson_vignaux_1999, title={Genetic matches and the logic of the law}, volume={105}, ISSN={["0016-6707"]}, DOI={10.1023/A:1003720906943}, abstractNote={In a recent article Levine and Kobilinsky (1997) point out that current methods in forensic DNA 'identification' are inadequate because the commercial kits commonly used in forensic practice do not detect the true genotype, but rather a genotype based on convenient categorization. For this reason, Levine and Kobilinsky argue that statistics attached to such categorizations are invalid. The authors believe that the arguments of Levine and Kobilinsky are logically flawed.}, number={2}, journal={GENETICA}, author={Curran, JM and Robertson, B and Vignaux, GA}, year={1999}, pages={211–213} }
 @article{curran_triggs_buckleton_weir_1999, title={Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations}, volume={44}, number={5}, journal={Journal of Forensic Sciences}, author={Curran, J. M. and Triggs, C. M. and Buckleton, J. and Weir, B. S.}, year={1999}, pages={987–995} }
 @article{curran_buckleton_triggs_1999, title={The robustness of a continuous likelihood approach to bayesian analysis of forensic glass evidence}, volume={104}, ISSN={["0379-0738"]}, DOI={10.1016/S0379-0738(99)00097-3}, abstractNote={In previous work [1], [2], [3] the authors [K.A.J. Walsh, J.S. Buckleton, C.M. Triggs, A practical example of glass interpretation, Sci. Justice 36 (1996) 213–218; J.M. Curran, Forensic application of Bayesian interference to glass evidence, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, 1997; J.M. Curran, C.M. Triggs, J.S. Buckleton, S. Coulson, Combining a continuous Bayesian approach with grouping information, Forensic Sci. Int. 91 (1998) 181–196] have presented various aspects of a Bayesian interpretation of forensic glass evidence. Such an interpretation relies on assumptions that may not hold. This paper demonstrates the robustness of the Bayesian approach to deviations from the statistically convenient notion of normality of the measurements.}, number={2-3}, journal={FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL}, author={Curran, JM and Buckleton, J and Triggs, CM}, year={1999}, month={Oct}, pages={91–103} }