@book{greenstein_davis_2013, title={Methods of family research}, DOI={10.4135/9781544308579}, abstractNote={Preface The Goal of This Text What's New in the Third Edition To the Student To the Instructor Organization of This Text Acknowledgments 1. Why Do Research on Families? What Are the Stages of Social Research? How Is Research on Families Different? The Benefits of Well-Conducted Research Study Questions For Further Reading 2. Causal Inference in Family Research Variables Units of Analysis Thinking Causally Framing the Hypothesis Causal Inference in Qualitative Research Study Questions For Further Reading 3. Searching and Reading the Literature Reading a Journal Article Where Do I Go From Here? How Do Journal Articles Get Published? Research Monographs Edited Volumes Other Types of Publications Study Questions For Further Reading 4. Sampling Issues Defining the Population Sampling Designs How Large Does the Sample Need to Be? How Do We Go About Choosing a Sampling Technique? Study Questions For Further Reading 5. How Do We Measure Concepts? Characteristics of a Good Measurement Procedure Levels of Measurement What Are Reliability and Validity? Some Thoughts on Reliability and Validity Study Questions For Further Reading 6. Working With Scales and Indices Types of Scales and Indices Using Existing Scales and Indices How Do We Evaluate Scales and Indices? How Do We Deal With Missing Data in Scales and Indices? Study Questions For Further Reading 7. Studying Families: Quantitative Methods Studying Families Through Experiments Studying Families Through Survey Methods Studying Families Through Nonreactive Techniques Types of Nonreactive Research Secondary Analysis of Sample Surveys Some Limitations of Quantitative Methods Study Questions For Further Reading 8. Studying Families: Qualitative Methods Qualitative Research Compared to Quantitative Research Types of Qualitative Strategies Studying Families through Observation Evaluating Qualitative Research Study Questions For Further Reading 9. Studying Families: Mixed Methods Mixed-Method Approaches to Family Research Mixed-Model Studies in Family Research Some Closing Thoughts on Choosing a Research Strategy Study Questions For Further Reading 10. Using Other People's Data Advantages and Disadvantages of Secondary Analysis What Are Some Sources of Data About Families? Sources of Secondary Data Sets Future Trends in Secondary Data Analysis Study Questions For Further Reading 11. Analyzing Data on Families Descriptive Statistics Interpreting Cross-classification Tables Inferential Statistics Commonly Reported Tests of Statistical Significance Some Thoughts About Statistical Analysis Study Questions For Further Reading 12. Advanced Topics in Family Analysis The Idea of Nested Entities Analyzing Nested Data Individual Change over Time Final Thoughts on Nested Entities Study Questions For Further Reading 13. Evaluating Family Programs Needs and Social Impact Assessment: What Is the Problem? Outcome Assessment: Does It Work? Process Research: How Does It Work? Some Thoughts About Randomization in Evaluation Research The Relationship Between Applied and Basic Research Study Questions For Further Reading 14. The Ethics and Politics of Family Research Ethical Issues in Research on Families and Children What Is the Role of the Institutional Review Board? Political Concerns in Research on Families Some Closing Thoughts Study Questions For Further Reading References Glossary and Index About the Authors}, publisher={Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE}, author={Greenstein, T. N. and Davis, S. N.}, year={2013} }
 @article{davis_greenstein_marks_2007, title={Effects of union type on division of household Labor - Do cohabiting men really perform more housework?}, volume={28}, ISSN={["1552-5481"]}, DOI={10.1177/0192513X07300968}, abstractNote={ Using data from 17,636 respondents in 28 nations, this research uses multilevel modeling to compare the reported division of household labor and factors affecting it for currently married and currently cohabiting couples. Cohabiting men report performing more household labor than do married men, and cohabiting women report performing less household labor than do married women. The findings provide support for the time-availability, relative-resources, and gender-ideology perspectives. The effects of time availability and relative resources on the division of household labor are substantially the same for both union types, but gender ideology is more influential on the division of labor reported by cohabiting than by married respondents. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed. }, number={9}, journal={JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES}, author={Davis, Shannon N. and Greenstein, Theodore N. and Marks, Jennifer P. Gerteisen}, year={2007}, month={Sep}, pages={1246–1272} }
 @article{greenstein_davis_2006, title={Cross-national variations in divorce: Effects of women's power, prestige and dependence}, volume={37}, number={2}, journal={Journal of Comparative Family Studies}, author={Greenstein, T. N. and Davis, S. N.}, year={2006}, pages={253-} }
 @article{davis_greenstein_2004, title={Cross-national variations in the division of household Labor}, volume={66}, ISSN={["0022-2445"]}, DOI={10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00091.x}, abstractNote={Using data from the International Social Justice Project, we describe the division of household labor in married couple households using a sample of 13 nations (N= 10,153). We find significant differences in the division of household labor based upon respondents’ nations of residence. We find support for the time availability approach; households where the wife is employed outside the home for pay are more likely to respond that husbands perform at least half of the household labor. We also find support for the relative resources approach; in households where wives’ education equals or exceeds that of their husbands, husbands are more likely to perform half of the household labor. We find little support for the economic dependence approach. We suggest that future cross‐national research should place individuals in context to determine why there are nation differences in the reported division of household labor.}, number={5}, journal={JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY}, author={Davis, SN and Greenstein, TN}, year={2004}, month={Dec}, pages={1260–1271} }
 @article{davis_greenstein_2004, title={Interactive effects of gender ideology and age at first marriage on women's marital disruption}, volume={25}, ISSN={["1552-5481"]}, DOI={10.1177/0192513X03257795}, abstractNote={ A sample of ever-married women from the NLSY79 is analyzed to examine the effects of age at first marriage and gender ideology on the likelihood of experiencing marital disruption. The authors hypothesize that age at first marriage will have no effect on the likelihood of experiencing marital disruption for non-traditional women, but that there will be a strong negative effect for traditional women. The authors use the log-rate model for piecewise-constant rates to estimate the log odds of respondents’ hazard for experiencing a marital disruption separately for each of the three gender ideologygroups.Findingssuggest that ageat first marriage affects women’s likelihood of marital disruption contingent upon gender ideology. It is suggested that gender ideology is a lens through which women view the world and make decisions and that within each ideology category the factors that affect likelihood of divorce may differ as a result. }, number={5}, journal={JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES}, author={Davis, SN and Greenstein, TN}, year={2004}, month={Jul}, pages={658–682} }
 @article{davis_2003, title={Sex stereotypes in commercials targeted toward children: A content analysis}, volume={23}, DOI={10.1080/02732170390225331}, number={4}, journal={Sociological Spectrum}, author={Davis, S. N.}, year={2003}, pages={407–424} }
 @misc{davis_2001, title={Birth alternatives: How women select childbirth care}, volume={30}, number={2}, journal={Contemporary Sociology}, author={Davis, S. N.}, year={2001}, pages={193–194} }
 @article{davis_bissler_leiter_2001, title={Leveling the playing field: An orientation to graduate study in sociology}, volume={29}, ISSN={["0092-055X"]}, DOI={10.2307/1318946}, number={4}, journal={TEACHING SOCIOLOGY}, author={Davis, SN and Bissler, DL and Leiter, J}, year={2001}, month={Oct}, pages={454–462} }