@article{nathan b. o'berry_faircloth_jones_herbert_abaye_mckemie_brownie_2009, title={Differential Responses of Cotton Cultivars when Applying Mepiquat Pentaborate}, volume={101}, ISSN={["0002-1962"]}, DOI={10.2134/agronj2007.0333}, abstractNote={Plant growth regulators are routinely used in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production to reduce plant height and hasten maturity. The objective of this research was to determine the response of several cotton cultivars to mepiquat pentaborate (MPB) application in environments accumulating different levels of heat units. Four MPB application regimes were imposed on three cultivars in Virginia and South Carolina in 2005 and 2006. Total MPB season rates of 0.0, 54.9, 85.3, or 121.9 g ai ha−1 applied at the five‐leaf stage, pin‐head square, match‐head square, and early bloom were used. The cultivars were: Deltapine (DP) 444 BG/RR, an “early‐maturing” cultivar; Fibermax (FM) 960 BR, a “medium‐maturing” cultivar; and DP 555 BG/RR, a “late‐maturing” cultivar. In South Carolina in 2006, FM 960 BR July plant height was reduced by 25% with MPB application compared to only 12 and 13% for DP 444 BG/RR and DP 555 BG/RR, respectively, although actual plant height reductions were not different among cultivars. Mepiquat pentaborate applications decreased plant height at harvest by 8 to 34%, height‐to‐node ratio by 10 to 32%, enhanced maturity as measured by nodes above white flower for all cultivars, and decreased lint yield by 3.7 to 8.5% compared to untreated cotton. Higher seasonal totals and earlier initiation of MPB application resulted in the greatest decrease in lint yield.}, number={1}, journal={AGRONOMY JOURNAL}, author={Nathan B. O'Berry and Faircloth, Joel C. and Jones, Michael A. and Herbert, David A., Jr. and Abaye, Azenegashe O. and McKemie, Thomas E. and Brownie, Cavell}, year={2009}, pages={25–31} } @article{koger_price_faircloth_wilcut_nichols_2007, title={Effect of residual herbicides used in the last POST-Directed application on weed control and cotton yield in glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant cotton}, volume={21}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-026.1}, number={2}, journal={Weed Technology}, author={Koger, C. H. and Price, A. J. and Faircloth, J. C. and Wilcut, J. W. and Nichols, S. P.}, year={2007}, pages={378–383} } @article{rinehardt_edmisten_wells_faircloth_2004, title={Response of ultra-narrow and conventional spaced cotton to variable nitrogen rates}, volume={27}, ISSN={["1532-4087"]}, DOI={10.1081/PLN-120030379}, abstractNote={Abstract Insufficient nitrogen (N) uptake in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) has been shown to delay maturity and decrease lint yields, while excessive amounts will cause a host of disadvantages, ranging from increased insect damage to defoliation difficulties. Proper nitrogen fertilization rates are therefore essential to maximizing lint production while minimizing input costs. This test was designed to determine if ultra–narrow row cotton (UNRC) has similar nitrogen requirements as conventional row cotton (CRC). Two sites, one in peanuts and the other fallow the previous growing season, and four nitrogen rates (45, 67, 90, and 112 kg N ha−1) were used to compare soil fertility and nitrogen effects on petiole nitrate concentrations, lint yields, and ginning percentages. Although petiole nitrate concentrations between early and peak bloom were lower in ultra–narrow row cotton with 45 and 67 kg N ha−1, there was no correlation between petiole nitrate concentrations and lint yield. Conventional spacing receiving 67 kg N ha−1 had the highest lint production at both locations, while application of 90 kg N ha−1 produced the highest yields in UNRC at both locations. Ultra–narrow row cotton produced numerically higher yields than conventional row at all nitrogen rates at the location without a previous legume crop, but no significant trend was observed. Ultra–narrow row cotton lint percentages were significantly lower than conventional spacing, independent of nitrogen application rate.}, number={4}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION}, author={Rinehardt, JM and Edmisten, KL and Wells, R and Faircloth, JC}, year={2004}, pages={743–755} } @article{faircloth_edmisten_bradley_2003, title={Whitefringed beetles (Graphognathus spp.) damage to North Carolina cotton}, volume={38}, ISSN={["0749-8004"]}, DOI={10.18474/0749-8004-38.1.140}, abstractNote={Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Joel C. Faircloth, Keith L. Edmisten, J. R. Bradley; Whitefringed Beetles (Graphognathus spp.) Damage to North Carolina Cotton. Journal of Entomological Science 1 January 2003; 38 (1): 140. doi: https://doi.org/10.18474/0749-8004-38.1.140 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest Search}, number={1}, journal={JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE}, author={Faircloth, JC and Edmisten, KL and Bradley, JR}, year={2003}, month={Jan}, pages={140–140} } @article{faircloth_bradley_van duyn_2002, title={Effect of insecticide treatments and environmental factors on thrips populations, plant growth and yield of cotton}, volume={37}, ISSN={["0749-8004"]}, DOI={10.18474/0749-8004-37.4.308}, abstractNote={Field experiments were conducted in 1997–1999 in Washington Co., NC, to examine how cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, is affected by thrips species composition and abundance, environmental factors, and insecticide applications. Populations of adult and juvenile thrips were monitored in seedling cotton treated with insecticide applications of either imidacloprid as a seed treatment, acephate as a foliar spray, or aldicarb applied in-furrow. The number of plants per 3.05 row-m, location of the first fruiting branch, number of open bolls per 1.52 row-m, yields, accumulated degree-d 60′s (DD60′s), and accumulated rainfall were recorded each year the studies were conducted. Aldicarb and acephate provided better thrips control than did imidacloprid in all 3 yrs. Thrips species ratios differed among years. In 1997, the aldicarb treatment resulted in a better “earliness profile” (lower fruit set and more early opening bolls) than either acephate or imidacloprid, while in 1998 and 1999 there were few differences in these plant parameters. In 1997, all insecticide treatments resulted in statistically higher yields compared with the untreated check. Accumulated DD60′s were consistently higher in 1998 and 1999 than in 1997 after the first thrips sampling date. Cumulative rainfall appeared to be inversely associated with juvenile thrips populations.}, number={4}, journal={JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE}, author={Faircloth, JC and Bradley, JR and Van Duyn, JW}, year={2002}, month={Oct}, pages={308–316} } @article{faircloth_bradley_van duyn_groves_2001, title={Reproductive success and damage potential of tobacco thrips and western flower thrips on cotton seedlings in a greenhouse environment}, volume={18}, number={3}, journal={Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology}, author={Faircloth, J. C. and Bradley, J. R. and Van Duyn, J. W. and Groves, R. L.}, year={2001}, pages={179–185} }