@misc{munoz_2004, title={On two wings: Humble faith and common sense at the American founding}, volume={32}, number={1}, journal={Interpretation}, author={Munoz, P.}, year={2004}, pages={105–109} }
 @misc{munoz_2004, title={The  founding fathers and the place of religion in America}, volume={32}, number={1}, journal={Interpretation}, author={Munoz, P.}, year={2004}, pages={105–109} }
 @article{munoz_2003, title={George Washington on Religious Liberty}, volume={65}, number={1}, journal={Review of Politics}, author={Munoz, V. P.}, year={2003}, pages={11–33} }
 @article{munoz_2003, title={James Madison's principle of religious liberty}, volume={97}, ISSN={["0003-0554"]}, DOI={10.1017/S0003055403000492}, abstractNote={Although James Madison has been invoked by justices and judicial scholars for over 100 years, Madison's principle of religious liberty has never been fully grasped or adopted by the Supreme Court. Judges and scholars have failed to understand Madison's radical but simple teaching that religion is not part of the social compact and, therefore, that the state may not take religion within its cognizance. In this article I set forth Madison's principle of “noncognizance” in light of the social compact theory he articulates in the “Memorial and Remonstrance.” I then attempt to show how it consistently explains Madison's political actions and writings on religious liberty. I conclude by explaining how a “Madisonian” approach, properly understood, would adjudicate the First Amendment's religion clauses.The author would like to thank Mark Blitz, Charles R. Kesler, Nicholas May, Ralph A. Rossum, and Michael Uhlmann for their comments on drafts of this article.}, number={1}, journal={AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW}, author={Munoz, VP}, year={2003}, month={Feb}, pages={17–32} }