@book{wyer_barbercheck_cookmeyer_ozturk_m._2014, title={Women, science, and technology: A reader in feminist science studies}, publisher={New York: Routledge}, year={2014} }
 @article{wayne_korol_mackay_2005, title={Microclinal variation for ovariole number and body size in Drosophila melanogaster in 'Evolution Canyon'}, volume={123}, ISSN={["1573-6857"]}, DOI={10.1007/s10709-004-5056-y}, abstractNote={Sites that display strong environmental contrasts in close proximity, such as 'Evolution Canyon' on Mt. Carmel, Israel, are natural theatres for investigating adaptive evolution in action. We reared Drosophila melanogaster from collection sites along altitudinal transects on the north- and south-facing canyon slopes in each of three temperature environments, and assessed genetic variation in ovariole number and body size between and within collection sites, and temperature plasticity. Both traits exhibited significant genetic variation within collection sites and phenotypic plasticity in response to temperature, but not genetic variation for plasticity. Between-site genetic variation in ovariole number was negatively correlated with altitude on both slopes of the canyon, and collections from the north- and south-facing slopes were genetically differentiated for male, but not female, body size. Genetic variation between sites within easy dispersal range is consistent with the action of strong natural selection, although neither the selective agent(s) nor the direct targets of selection are known.}, number={3}, journal={GENETICA}, author={Wayne, ML and Korol, A and Mackay, TFC}, year={2005}, month={Mar}, pages={263–270} }
 @article{wayne_hackett_dilda_nuzhdin_pasyukova_mackay_2001, title={Quantitative trait locus mapping of fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster}, volume={77}, ISSN={["0016-6723"]}, DOI={10.1017/S0016672300004894}, abstractNote={We examined the genetic architecture of four fitness-related traits (reproductive success, ovariole 
number, body size and early fecundity) in a panel of 98 Oregon-R × 2b3 recombinant inbred lines 
(RILs). Highly significant genetic variation was observed in this population for female, but not 
male, reproductive success. The cross-sex genetic correlation for reproductive success was 0·20, 
which is not significantly different from zero. There was significant genetic variation segregating in 
this cross for ovariole number, but not for body size or early fecundity. The RILs were genotyped 
for cytological insertion sites of roo transposable elements, yielding 76 informative markers with an 
average spacing of 3·2 cM. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting female reproductive success and 
ovariole number were mapped using a composite interval mapping procedure. QTL for female 
reproductive success were located at the tip of the X chromosome between markers at cytological 
locations 1B and 3E; and on the left arm of chromosome 2 in the 30D–38A cytological region. 
Ovariole number QTL mapped to cytological intervals 62D–69D and 98A–98E, both on the third 
chromosome. The regions harbouring QTL for female reproductive success and ovariole number 
were also identified as QTL for longevity in previous studies with these lines.}, number={1}, journal={GENETICAL RESEARCH}, author={Wayne, ML and Hackett, JB and Dilda, CL and Nuzhdin, SV and Pasyukova, EG and MacKay, TFC}, year={2001}, month={Feb}, pages={107–116} }
 @article{wayne_mackay_1998, title={Quantitative genetics of ovariole number in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mutational variation and genotype-environment interaction}, volume={148}, number={1}, journal={Genetics}, author={Wayne, M. L. and Mackay, T. F. C.}, year={1998}, pages={201–210} }
 @misc{wayne_simonsen_1998, title={Statistical tests of neutrality in the age of weak selection}, volume={13}, ISSN={["1872-8383"]}, DOI={10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01360-3}, abstractNote={Why review statistical tests of neutrality at a time when pan-selectionists and pan-neutralists alike seem to have been replaced by weak selectionists? First, we still don't actually know how variation is maintained at the molecular level; and second, tests of neutrality have a utility for evolutionary biologists beyond the neutralist/selectionist debate. New tests and variations on the existing tests are arising practically every month. From the complementary viewpoints of an empiricist and a theoretician, we sample the recent literature on tests of statistical neutrality and discuss the motivations, applications, assumptions, interpretations and future directions of these tests.}, number={6}, journal={TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION}, author={Wayne, ML and Simonsen, KL}, year={1998}, month={Jun}, pages={236–240} }
 @article{wayne_hackett_mackay_1997, title={Quantitative genetics of ovariole number in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Segregating variation and fitness}, volume={51}, DOI={10.2307/2411045}, number={4}, journal={Evolution}, author={Wayne, M. L. and Hackett, J. B. and Mackay, T. F. C.}, year={1997}, pages={1156–1163} }