@article{reberg-horton_grossman_kornecki_meijer_price_place_webster_2012, title={Utilizing cover crop mulches to reduce tillage in organic systems in the southeastern USA}, volume={27}, ISSN={["1742-1713"]}, DOI={10.1017/s1742170511000469}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={1}, journal={RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Reberg-Horton, S. Chris and Grossman, Julie M. and Kornecki, Ted S. and Meijer, Alan D. and Price, Andrew J. and Place, George T. and Webster, Theodore M.}, year={2012}, month={Mar}, pages={41–48} }
 @article{webster_coble_1997, title={Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995}, volume={11}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x00043001}, abstractNote={The Southern Weed Science Society has conducted an annual survey of the most troublesome weeds in several major crops since 1971. The objective of this summary was to characterize shifts in weed populations over a 22-yr period in four major agronomic crops. For corn, soybean, cotton, and peanut, the largest increases in rank as the most troublesome weeds were found with sicklepod and bermudagrass. The largest decreases were found with johnsongrass, crab-grasses, and common cocklebur. Morningglories and nutsedges remained relatively constant weed problems over the 22-yr period. Sicklepod, nutsedges, and morningglories were the three most troublesome weeds averaged over all crops because they are so well established and relatively difficult to control. Pigweeds (Palmer amaranth, sandhills amaranth, tumble pigweed, and water-hemps) have become increasingly important in soybean, peanut, and cotton in a limited number of states.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Webster, TM and Coble, HD}, year={1997}, pages={308–317} }
 @article{webster_wilcut_coble_1997, title={Influence of AC 263,222 rate and application method on weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea)}, volume={11}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x00045358}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted in 1991 and 1992 to evaluate the weed control effectiveness from several rates of AC 263,222 applied PPI and PRE (36 and 72 g ai/ha), early POST (EPOST) (18, 36, 54, or 72 g/ha), POST (18, 36, 54, or 72 g/ha), and EPOST followed by (fb) POST (27 fb 27 g/ha or 36 fb 36 g/ha). These treatments were compared to the commercial standard of bentazon at 0.28 kg ai/ha plus paraquat at 0.14 kg ai/ha EPOST fb bentazon at 0.56 kg/ha plus paraquat at 0.14 kg/ha plus 2,4-DB at 0.28 kg ae/ha. Application method had little effect on weed control with AC 263,222. In contrast, application rate affected control. Purple nutsedge, yellow nutsedge, prickly sida, smallflower morningglory, bristly starbur, common cocklebur, and coffee senna were controlled at least 82% with AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha (one-half the maximum registered use rate) regardless of application method. AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha (registered use rate) controlled sicklepod 84 to 93%, Florida beggarweed 65 to 100%, andIpomoeamorningglory species 89 to 99%. A single application of AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha or more controlled all weeds (with the exception of Florida beggarweed) as well or greater than sequential applications of bentazon plus paraquat fb bentazon, paraquat, and 2,4-DB. All rates of AC 263,222 applied POST and all application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha had better yields than the pendimethalin control.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Webster, TM and Wilcut, JW and Coble, HD}, year={1997}, pages={520–526} }
 @article{webster_coble_1997, title={Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) management in corn (Zea mays) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) rotations}, volume={11}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x00045395}, abstractNote={A field study was conducted in 1994 and 1995 to determine the effect of MON 12037, linuron, and ametryn on purple nutsedge density in field corn in a 2-yr rotation with cotton. Each corn treatment included cultivation and noncultivation. A standard treatment for purple nutsedge control was applied to all cotton plots in the second season of the corn–cotton rotation. Purple nutsedge shoot densities were reduced in cultivated MON 12037, noncultivated MON 12037, and cultivated ametryn in the corn–corn and corn–cotton rotations. Purple nutsedge tuber population was reduced in the corn–corn rotation by MON 12037 with and without cultivation, cultivated linuron, and cultivated ametryn treatments relative to the noncultivated check. In the corn–cotton rotation, purple nutsedge tuber population was reduced only by the cultivated MON 12037 and cultivated ametryn treatments relative to the noncultivated check.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Webster, TM and Coble, HD}, year={1997}, pages={543–548} }