@article{solmon_chuang_meskhidze_chen_2009, title={Acidic processing of mineral dust iron by anthropogenic compounds over the north Pacific Ocean}, volume={114}, ISSN={["2169-8996"]}, DOI={10.1029/2008jd010417}, abstractNote={Atmospheric processing of mineral aerosol by anthropogenic pollutants may be an important process by which insoluble iron can be transformed into soluble forms and become available to oceanic biota. Observations of the soluble iron fraction in atmospheric aerosol exhibit large variability, which is poorly represented in models. In this study, we implemented a dust iron dissolution scheme in a global chemistry transport model (GEOS‐Chem). The model is applied over the North Pacific Ocean during April 2001, a period when concentrations of dust and pollution within the east Asia outflow were high. Simulated fields of many key chemical constituents compare reasonably well with available observations, although some discrepancies are identified and discussed. In our simulations, the production of soluble iron varies temporally and regionally depending on pollution‐to‐dust ratio, primarily due to strong buffering by calcite. Overall, we show that the chemical processing mechanism produces significant amounts of dissolved iron reaching and being deposited in remote regions of the Pacific basin, with some seasonal variability. Simulated enhancements in particulate soluble iron fraction range from 0.5% to 6%, which is consistent with the observations. According to our simulations, ∼30% to 70% of particulate soluble iron over the North Pacific Ocean basin can be attributed to atmospheric processing. On the basis of April 2001 monthly simulations, sensitivity tests suggest that doubling SO2 emissions can induce a significant increase (13% on average, up to 40% during specific events) in dissolved iron production and deposition to the remote Pacific. We roughly estimate that half of the primary productivity induced by iron deposition in a north Pacific high‐nutrient low‐chlorophyll region is due to soluble iron derived from anthropogenic chemical processing of Asian aerosol.}, journal={JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES}, author={Solmon, F. and Chuang, P. Y. and Meskhidze, N. and Chen, Y.}, year={2009}, month={Jan} } @misc{chen_cheng_creamer_2008, title={Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review}, volume={99}, ISSN={["1873-2976"]}, DOI={10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057}, abstractNote={Anaerobic digestion is an attractive waste treatment practice in which both pollution control and energy recovery can be achieved. Many agricultural and industrial wastes are ideal candidates for anaerobic digestion because they contain high levels of easily biodegradable materials. Problems such as low methane yield and process instability are often encountered in anaerobic digestion, preventing this technique from being widely applied. A wide variety of inhibitory substances are the primary cause of anaerobic digester upset or failure since they are present in substantial concentrations in wastes. Considerable research efforts have been made to identify the mechanism and the controlling factors of inhibition. This review provides a detailed summary of the research conducted on the inhibition of anaerobic processes. The inhibitors commonly present in anaerobic digesters include ammonia, sulfide, light metal ions, heavy metals, and organics. Due to the difference in anaerobic inocula, waste composition, and experimental methods and conditions, literature results on inhibition caused by specific toxicants vary widely. Co-digestion with other waste, adaptation of microorganisms to inhibitory substances, and incorporation of methods to remove or counteract toxicants before anaerobic digestion can significantly improve the waste treatment efficiency.}, number={10}, journal={BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY}, author={Chen, Ye and Cheng, Jay J. and Creamer, Kurt S.}, year={2008}, month={Jul}, pages={4044–4064} } @article{sharma-shivappa_chen_2008, title={conversion of cotton wastes to bioenergy and value-added products}, volume={51}, DOI={10.13031/2013.25377}, abstractNote={Cotton accounts for nearly 40% of global fiber production. While approximately 80 countries worldwide produce cotton, the U.S., China, and India together provide over half the world's cotton. High cotton production is accompanied by generation of tons of cotton waste each year. Large amounts of residue from the field and gins results in not only environmental problems due to disposal issues and cotton diseases and pests, but also difficulties in cultivation due to slow decomposition in the soil. Development of economical and efficient methods for utilizing and/or disposing of cotton waste have been investigated for years, but scale-up and marketing issues need to be resolved. Cotton waste can be used as an energy source through briquetting, pyrolysis, and anaerobic digestion. Studies suggest that composition of cotton waste is similar to other lignocellulosic feedstocks, and it has the potential to be used for bioethanol production. However, proper pretreatment strategies need to be developed to reduce lignin (comprising approximately 30%). Cotton waste can also be processed into industrial products such as animal feed and bedding, soil amendment, and substrate for vegetative growth through various treatments. Enzyme production through utilization of cotton waste as a carbon source is another potential application. A review of the various conversion processes suggests that although cotton waste is suitable for the production of a variety of products, in-depth investigation at the pilot scale is essential to determine process efficacy and economic feasibility.}, number={6}, journal={Transactions of the ASABE}, author={Sharma-Shivappa, R. R. and Chen, Y.}, year={2008}, pages={2239–2246} } @article{silverstein_chen_sharma-shivappa_boyette_osborne_2007, title={A comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving saccharification of cotton stalks}, volume={98}, ISSN={["1873-2976"]}, DOI={10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.022}, abstractNote={The effectiveness of sulfuric acid (H(2)SO(4)), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), and ozone pretreatments for conversion of cotton stalks to ethanol was investigated. Ground cotton stalks at a solid loading of 10% (w/v) were pretreated with H(2)SO(4), NaOH, and H(2)O(2) at concentrations of 0.5%, 1%, and 2% (w/v). Treatment temperatures of 90 degrees C and 121 degrees C at 15 psi were investigated for residence times of 30, 60, and 90 min. Ozone pretreatment was performed at 4 degrees C with constant sparging of stalks in water. Solids from H(2)SO(4), NaOH, and H(2)O(2) pretreatments (at 2%, 60 min, 121 degrees C/15 psi) showed significant lignin degradation and/or high sugar availability and hence were hydrolyzed by Celluclast 1.5L and Novozym 188 at 50 degrees C. Sulfuric acid pretreatment resulted in the highest xylan reduction (95.23% for 2% acid, 90 min, 121 degrees C/15 psi) but the lowest cellulose to glucose conversion during hydrolysis (23.85%). Sodium hydroxide pretreatment resulted in the highest level of delignification (65.63% for 2% NaOH, 90 min, 121 degrees C/15 psi) and cellulose conversion (60.8%). Hydrogen peroxide pretreatment resulted in significantly lower (p