@book{hess_steelman_beechwood_cavalieri_crooks_doig_norwood_paxton_schuster_trinks_2006, title={Guided by planning, powered by people: open space protection in the Triangle}, institution={Raleigh: Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University}, author={Hess, G. and Steelman, T. A. and Beechwood, B. and Cavalieri, S. and Crooks, L. and Doig, S. and Norwood, C. and Paxton, D. and Schuster, G. and Trinks, M.}, year={2006} }
 @article{cavalieri_farin_kinder_van camp_whitacre_washburn_britt_2001, title={Ovarian follicular development following administration of progesterone or aspiration of ovarian follicles in Holstein cows}, volume={55}, ISSN={["1879-3231"]}, DOI={10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00445-9}, abstractNote={The objective of this study was to compare the effects of administration of a single injection of progesterone (P4) and follicle aspiration on Day 7 of the estrous cycle on the timing and synchrony of follicular wave emergence, time of ovulation, and concentrations of P4, estradiol and FSH in Holstein cows. Twenty cows were assigned to 4 groups (n=5 cows per group) in a 2 by 2 factorial arrangement. Cows were treated on Day 7 (Day 0 = estrus) of the estrous cycle with either sham follicular aspiration and an oil vehicle administered intramuscularly (control), aspiration of ovarian follicles (aspiration), 200 mg of P4 im, or aspiration and 200 mg of P4 im (aspiration + P4). On Day 11, PGF(2alpha)(25mg) was administered to all groups. Synchrony of ovulation was less variable in each of the treatment groups compared with the control group (P<0.05), whereas ovulation was delayed in cows in the P4 group (P<0.05). Day of follicular wave emergence was delayed in the cows of the P4 group compared with cows in the aspiration and aspiration + P4 groups (P<0.01), whereas variability in wave emergence was less among both groups of aspirated cows compared with the cows in the control group (P<0.01). More follicles 4 to 7 mm in diameter were detected in the 2 aspiration groups compared with the cows in the control and P4 group (P<0.05). No difference was detected among groups in the maximum concentration of FSH associated with follicular wave emergence. We conclude that both the administration of P4 and the aspiration of follicles on Day 7 of the estrous cycle improves the synchrony of ovulation when luteolysis is induced on Day 11 and results in similar concentrations of FSH at the time of follicular wave emergence, but the timing of wave emergence and the number of follicles post-emergence differ.}, number={3}, journal={THERIOGENOLOGY}, author={Cavalieri, J and Farin, PW and Kinder, JE and Van Camp, SD and Whitacre, MD and Washburn, SP and Britt, JH}, year={2001}, month={Feb}, pages={805–821} }
 @article{cavalieri_farin_1999, title={Birth of a Holstein freemartin calf co-twinned to a schistosomus reflexus fetus}, volume={52}, ISSN={["0093-691X"]}, DOI={10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00174-0}, abstractNote={An unusual case of a live Holstein freemartin calf co-twinned with schistosomus reflexus fetus is presented here. Delivery of the schistosomus reflexus was achieved by fetotomy 24 h after manual delivery of a live heifer calf. The dam subsequently experienced concurrent metritis and left displacement of the abomasum; however, she conceived following insemination 85 d post partum. Cytogenetic examination of the live heifer using lymphocyte culture and cutaneous fibroblast cell culture failed to demonstrate chromosomal chimerism, whereas polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detected the presence of the bovine Y-chromosome marker BRY-1. Low concentrations of testosterone, estradiol and progesterone at 3, 6, 24 and 48 h after administration of hCG were detected in the serum of the freemartin heifer. Genetic, hormonal, histological and clinical findings established the live female co-twin calf was a freemartin, an abnormality of phenotypic sex. Failure to detect any significant peripheral concentrations of androgen supports the hypothesis that masculinization of the freemartin reproductive tract arises from diffusion of androgen and possibly other substances from the male co-twin rather than from endogenous production of androgen within the freemartin. This report documents that the freemartin condition can be induced by a male fetus with severe developmental abnormalities.}, number={5}, journal={THERIOGENOLOGY}, author={Cavalieri, J and Farin, PW}, year={1999}, month={Oct}, pages={815–826} }
 @article{cavalieri_coleman_kinder_fitzpatrick_1998, title={Comparison of three methods of acute administration of progesterone on ovarian follicular development and the timing and synchrony of ovulation in Bos indicus heifers}, volume={49}, ISSN={["1879-3231"]}, DOI={10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00080-6}, abstractNote={The aim of this study was to induce the formation of a persistent dominant ovarian follicle and to compare the effects of 3 methods of acute administration of P4 on ovarian follicular development and on the timing and synchrony of ovulation. Stage of the estrous cycle was initially synchronized in Bos indicus heifers with a norgestomet implants (3 mg) for 10 d and with an analogue of PGF2 alpha (15 mg) on the first and last day of norgestomet treatment. Eight days after removal of the implants, heifers were randomly assigned to 4 groups. All heifers received a norgestomet implant (Day 0), which was removed 17 d later (Day 17); PGF2 alpha was administered on Days 0 and 4. Heifers in the control group (n = 5) received no other treatment. On Day 10 heifers in Group P4C (n = 5) were treated with a CIDR for 24 h; heifers in Group P4O (n = 5) were administered 100 mg i.m. of P4 in oil, while heifers in Group P4S (n = 5) were administered 100 mg i.m. of P4 in saline/alcohol. Data were analyzed using bootstrap estimates of location (mean) and spread (standard deviation; SD). Compared with the control heifers, day of emergence of the ovulatory follicle was delayed, and age and duration of dominance of the ovulatory follicle were reduced in the P4C and P4O heifers (P < 0.05) but not in the P4S heifers (P > 0.05). In all groups treated with P4 both the mean and variability (SD) in the timing of ovulation did not differ with that of the control group (P > 0.05) but there was less variability in the day of emergence, age, duration of dominance and diameter of the ovulatory follicle than in the control group (P < 0.05). Delayed timing and reduced synchrony (SD) of ovulation and greater age of the ovulatory follicle (P < 0.05) occurred in P4S heifers than in P4C heifers. We conclude that administration of 100 mg of P4 in oil is as effective as treatment with a CIDR for synchronizing emergence and ovulation of a newly recruited dominant follicle. However, reduced synchrony of ovulation, greater age of the ovulatory follicle and delayed timing of ovulation occurred following administration 100 mg of P4 in saline/alcohol compared with the CIDR device.}, number={7}, journal={THERIOGENOLOGY}, author={Cavalieri, J and Coleman, C and Kinder, JE and Fitzpatrick, LA}, year={1998}, month={May}, pages={1331–1343} }
 @article{cavalieri_kinder_fitzpatrick_1998, title={Duration of ovulation suppression with subcutaneous silicone implants containing norgestomet in Bos indicus heifers and cows}, volume={51}, ISSN={["1873-2232"]}, DOI={10.1016/S0378-4320(98)00058-X}, abstractNote={The aim of this study is to determine the duration of suppressing oestrus or ovulation in Bos indicus heifers and cows using norgestomet (N) incorporated into a silicone implant. Twelve heifers and 18 cows undergoing oestrous cycles were allocated to one of two treatment groups (6 heifers and 9 cows per group). Animals were treated with a single subcutaneous (s.c.) silicone implant containing 3 mg of N or two identical silicone implants (6 mg of N in two silicone implants) on day 0 of the study. An analogue of prostaglandin F2α was administered intramuscularly, to all animals, on days 0 and 6 to induce regression of corpora lutea. Implants were removed from all animals on day 21. Animals were observed for signs of behavioural oestrus while implants were in situ and for 6 d following implant removal. Blood samples were collected on alternate days from day 0 to 20 and again on day 21 and analysed for plasma progesterone (P4). Transrectal ultrasonography was performed on days 0, 6, 10, 14, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27, and along with concentration of P4 in plasma was used to confirm ovulation during the treatment period. The cumulative percentages of animals ovulating during the 21 days implants were in situ were 6.7% (3 mg of N in one silicone implant) and 0% (6 mg of N in two silicone implants). Intervals from implant removal to oestrus (mean±S.E.M.) did not differ significantly among animals treated with either 3 or 6 mg of N in silicone implants (46.8±7.0 vs. 55.4±7.1 h, P=0.398). Variances in interval from implant removal to oestrus among animals treated with 3 or 6 mg of N in silicone implants were also homogeneous (P=0.942). The mean diameter of the ovulatory follicle on day 21 was larger in the animals treated with 3 mg of N compared to animals treated with 6 mg of N in two silicone implants (13.1±0.8 vs. 9.7±0.7 mm, P=0.005). We conclude that treatment with 3 mg of N in a silicone implant will suppress ovulation in Bos indicus heifers and most cows for 21 d. Six mg of N in two silicone implants will suppress ovulation for 21 d in both cows and heifers.}, number={1}, journal={ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE}, author={Cavalieri, J and Kinder, JE and Fitzpatrick, LA}, year={1998}, month={Apr}, pages={15–22} }
 @article{cavalieri_kinder_de'ath_fitzpatrick_1998, title={Effects of short-term treatment with progesterone superimposed on 11 or 17 days of norgestomet treatment on the interval to oestrus and fertility in Bos indicus heifers}, volume={51}, ISSN={["1873-2232"]}, DOI={10.1016/S0378-4320(98)00064-5}, abstractNote={The aims of this study were to determine: (1) if short-term treatment of Bos indicus heifers with progesterone (P4) while implanted with a s.c. norgestomet implant for 17 days would influence the time interval to oestrus and increase fertility of the synchronised oestrus, and (2) whether the response to treatment with P4 would differ between heifers treated with a norgestomet implant for 17 vs. 11 days when short-term treatment with P4 is applied 3 days prior to implant removal. B. indicus heifers at two separate sites (A and B) were allocated to three groups at each site. Heifers in two groups (NG and NGP4 groups) were given a single s.c. norgestomet implant on the first day of treatment (day 0) while heifers in a third group (NGP4PG group) were implanted on day 6. A single P4 releasing Controlled Internal Drug Release device (CIDR) was inserted on day 14 in heifers in the NGP4 and NGP4PG groups and was removed 23.5±0.07 h later (day 15). Heifers in the NGP4PG group were administered an analogue of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) at the time of CIDR removal to regress corpora lutea. Implants were removed from all heifers on the same day (day 17) and a 400 IU of equine chorionic gonadotrophin (ECG) was administered s.c. Animals were artificially inseminated 11.1±0.17 h after detection of oestrus, using frozen semen from one bull at site A and one of five bulls at site B. Inseminations were carried out by one of two technicians. Treatment with P4 delayed oestrus and reduced the synchrony of oestrus at site A (hours to oestrus±SD: NG group, 39.0±13.7; NGP4 group, 66.3±24.4; NGP4PG group, 58.9±20.5 h; P<0.05) but not at site B (41.4±15.2, 42.5±10.1, 45.4±10.3 h; P>0.05). Pregnancy rates 6 weeks after insemination were found to be significantly associated with bull (P<0.001), treatment group (P=0.013) and insemination technician (P=0.033). Pregnancy rates were greater in the heifers in the NGP4 group than heifers in the NG group [50.3% (78/155) vs. 36.4% (60/165); odds ratio=1.83, 95% CI=1.14 to 2.96] and similar between heifers in the NGP4 and NGP4PG groups [50.3% (78/155) vs. 51.1% (63/117); odds ratio=1.06, 95% CI=0.67 to 1.69]. It was concluded that acute treatment with P4 can improve pregnancy rates in B. indicus heifers treated for 17 days with norgestomet implants. Reducing the duration of norgestomet treatment to 11 days and administration of PGF2α at the time of ending treatment with a CIDR device resulted in no differences in fertility, mean intervals to oestrus or synchrony of oestrus.}, number={3}, journal={ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE}, author={Cavalieri, J and Kinder, JE and De'ath, G and Fitzpatrick, LA}, year={1998}, month={May}, pages={169–183} }
 @article{murray_cavalieri_mj d'occhio_whyte_maclellan_fitzpatrick_1998, title={Treatment with progesterone and 17 beta-oestradiol to induce emergence of a newly-recruited dominant ovulatory follicle during oestrus synchronisation with long-term use of norgestomet in Brahman heifers}, volume={50}, ISSN={["1873-2232"]}, DOI={10.1016/S0378-4320(97)00082-1}, abstractNote={The aim of this study was to determine the effect on ovarian follicular growth and atresia, of acute treatment with either 100 mg of progesterone (n = 10), 200 mg of progesterone (n = 10), 10 mg of oestradiol + 100 mg of progesterone (n = 10), 10 mg of oestradiol (n = 10) or no treatment (n = 10), given on Day 10 of a 17-day treatment with a norgestomet implant in randomly cycling Bos indicus heifers. The fate of the dominant follicle on Day 10, emergence of the new cohort of follicles and the intervals from implant removal to ovulation were recorded by ultrasonography. Plasma concentrations of Luteinizing hormone (LH), progesterone and oestradiol were determined during the time when the norgestomet implant was in place. All treatments resulted in the emergence of a new cohort of follicles within 5 days of administration. The day of emergence of the ovulatory follicle tended to be delayed after treatment with 100 mg of progesterone (2.7 +/- 0.3 days after treatment), 200 mg of progesterone (3.7 +/- 0.5 days after treatment), 10 mg of oestradiol + 100 mg of progesterone (4.4 +/- 0.2 days after treatment) and 10 mg of oestradiol (4.6 +/- 0.4 days after treatment) compared to control heifers (1.4 +/- 1.4 days after time of treatment). The mean interval from implant removal to onset of oestrus was significantly shorter after treatment with 100 mg of progesterone (38.4 +/- 2.6 h) than after treatment with 200 mg of progesterone (61.5 +/- 3.9 h) but otherwise, the mean interval from implant removal to onset of oestrus did not differ. Oestrus synchrony, measured by the sample standard deviation of oestrus onset, was tighter in all treatment groups compared to untreated control heifers. The mean interval from implant removal to ovulation did not differ significantly between groups. The synchrony of ovulation, measured by the sample standard deviation of the interval from implant removal to ovulation, was significantly tighter after treatment with 100 mg of progesterone, 200 mg of progesterone and 10 mg of oestradiol compared to control heifers. Treatment with 10 mg of oestradiol resulted in ovulation in seven of 10 heifers before implant removal, three of which failed to ovulate after implant removal. Progesterone administered on Day 10 lowered plasma LH concentrations (P < 0.05), whereas treatment with oestradiol caused a surge of LH and ovulation. Progesterone administered with oestradiol prevented the LH surge. A combination treatment of oestradiol and progesterone given on Day 10 of a 17-day norgestomet treatment in a range of follicular states resulted in the consistent emergence of a new cohort of follicles which included the eventual ovulatory follicle.}, number={1-2}, journal={ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE}, author={Murray, AJ and Cavalieri, J and MJ D'Occhio and Whyte, TR and Maclellan, LJ and Fitzpatrick, LA}, year={1998}, month={Feb}, pages={11–26} }
 @article{cavalieri_van camp_1997, title={Bovine seminal vesiculitis: a review and update}, volume={13}, DOI={10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30337-6}, abstractNote={Seminal vesiculitis is the most common inflammatory condition affecting the reproductive tract of the bull. It represents a serious source of economic loss. This ailment is frequently seen in young peripubertal bulls and occasionally in older bulls, and it can negatively affect semen quality. Multiple etiologic agents have been cultured from seminal vesiculitis cases. Medical therapy is often unsuccessful; however, surgrey offers some hope for selected young bulls.}, number={2}, journal={Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice}, author={Cavalieri, J. and Van Camp, S. D.}, year={1997}, pages={233–241} }
 @article{cavalieri_kinder_death_fitzpatrick_1997, title={Effect of 48 h treatment with 17 beta-oestradiol or progesterone on follicular wave emergence and synchrony of ovulation in Bos indicus cows when administered at the end of a period of progesterone treatment}, volume={46}, ISSN={["1873-2232"]}, DOI={10.1016/S0378-4320(96)01620-X}, abstractNote={The objective of this study was to determine the effect of treatment with additional progesterone (P4) or 17 beta-oestradiol (E2) at the end of a period of P4 treatment on ovarian follicular development, ovulation time, and plasma gonadotrophin and steroid hormone concentrations of Bos indicus cows. Initially, two injections of PGF2 alpha were given 14 days apart, and at the time of the second injection (Day 0) all cows received a single P4-releasing controlled internal drug release (CIDR) device that was removed 10 days later. Control cows (Group 1, n = 8) received no other treatment. On Day 8, cows in Group 2 (n = 8) and Group 3 (n = 8) received either a s.c. implant containing E2, or a second CIDR device, respectively. All CIDR devices and E2 implants were removed at a similar time on Day 10. Treatment with E2 or P4 delayed mean (+/- SD) time of ovulation (113.1 +/- 25.6 h, 153.4 +/- 44.5 h and 150.8 +/- 25.1 h for Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively; P < 0.05) and the mean time (+/- SD) of the luteinising hormone (LH) peak (87.4 +/- 24.5 h, 124.3 +/- 45.0 h and 122.3 +/- 25.04 h for Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively; P < 0.05). Both treatments delayed the mean (+/- SD) day of emergence of the ovulatory follicle (7.7 +/- 3.6 days, 11.3 +/- 1.7 days and 11.1 +/- 1.5 days for Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively; P < 0.05), and reduced the variability in the day of emergence of the ovulatory follicle (P < 0.05) compared with the control cows. Variability in age and duration of dominance of the ovulatory follicle was greater in control animals compared with treated animals (P < 0.05). Treatment with E2 on Days 9 and 10 did not alter mean concentrations of gonadotrophins in the cows in Group 2 compared with control cows (P > 0.05), whereas treatment of cows with an additional CIDR device resulted in greater mean concentrations of FSH and lesser concentrations of LH on Day 9 (P < 0.05) compared with cows in Groups 1 and 2. By Day 10 mean concentrations of gonadotrophins were similar among cows in all three groups. Concentrations of E2 were less in cows in Group 3 compared with cows in Groups 1 and 2 from Day 9 to Day 11 (P < 0.05). We conclude that treatment with either E2 or P4 can influence the pattern of ovarian follicular development and ovulation in cattle; however, the mechanism of action of the two treatments may differ. Atretogenic treatments for ovarian follicles applied at the end of a period of progesterone treatment did not improve synchrony of ovulation.}, number={3-4}, journal={ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE}, author={Cavalieri, J and Kinder, JE and Death, G and Fitzpatrick, LA}, year={1997}, month={Apr}, pages={187–201} }