@article{jakkula_okeefe_knauft_boote_1997, title={Chemical characterization of a shriveled seed trait in peanut}, volume={37}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700050025x}, abstractNote={Seed morphology mutations affecting the major seed components in pea (Pisum sativum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) opened specialty markets for these crops. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oil and food crop of the world. Genetic alteration of seed composition may be useful in expanding markets for this crop. Some lines from the University of Florida peanut breeding program showed seed shriveling characteristic even when harvested mature. In the present study, three shriveled lines (529B, 563A, and 647A) were chemically characterized and compared with a normal‐seeded cultivar, Sunrunner. They were found to have only one third to two thirds the amount of storage lipid and double the amount of sucrose as normal peanuts. Differences were also observed for seed protein concentration, when expressed on a defatted meal basis. Higher relative proportions of phospholipid to triacylglycerol may indicate a block in the biochemical pathway for the conversion of sucrose into triacylglycerol in the shriveled seed mutants. Sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE) patterns revealed that there were differences in the levels of various proteins between normal seed and shriveled seed phenotypes. Differences were identified in the level of accumulation of storage lipid and also in the various proteins during the development of the shriveled seed.}, number={5}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Jakkula, LR and OKeefe, SF and Knauft, DA and Boote, KJ}, year={1997}, pages={1560–1567} }
 @article{gorbet_knauft_1997, title={Registration of 'SunOleic 95R' peanut}, volume={37}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700040081x}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 37, Issue 4 cropsci1997.0011183X003700040081x p. 1392-1392 Registration of Cultivars Registration of ‘SunOleic 95R’ Peanut D. W. Gorbet, Corresponding Author D. W. Gorbet [email protected] Univ. of Florida, NFREC, 3925 Hwy. 71, Marianna, FL, 32446Corresponding author ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorD. A. Knauft, D. A. Knauft Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7620Search for more papers by this author D. W. Gorbet, Corresponding Author D. W. Gorbet [email protected] Univ. of Florida, NFREC, 3925 Hwy. 71, Marianna, FL, 32446Corresponding author ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorD. A. Knauft, D. A. Knauft Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7620Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 July 1997 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700040081xCitations: 71AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume37, Issue4July–August 1997Pages 1392-1392 RelatedInformation}, number={4}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Gorbet, DW and Knauft, DA}, year={1997}, pages={1392–1392} }