@article{oreja_hare_jordan_leon_2023, title={Previous crop and herbicide timing application effects on weed population growth rate}, volume={9}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20232}, DOI={10.1002/cft2.20232}, abstractNote={AbstractA well‐designed crop rotation can create an unstable environment that disrupts weed population growth rates. In combination with effective herbicide programs, growers may maintain weed populations at levels below competitive and economic thresholds. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate how the preceding rotational crop determines the response of weed populations to in‐season postemergence herbicide programs and the weed population density of the following crop season. The first‐year crop treatments were corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.], and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. In the second year, all plots were planted with cotton, and herbicide treatments were single applications 2 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP), two sequential applications 2 and 4 or 4 and 6 WAP, three sequential applications 2, 4, and 6 WAP, and a weedy control without herbicides was included. In the absence of herbicides, corn had the lowest population growth rates for broadleaf weeds (λ = 0.8) while peanut and grain sorghum had the highest (λ = 1.7 and 1.3, respectively). The results indicated that herbicide applications focused exclusively on preventing yield loss may not be sufficient to ensure weed population reductions. Thus, the observed population growth rates (λ = 2 for grassy weeds and λ = 1.26 for broadleaved weeds) indicated that weed issues would continue increasing, despite meeting yield goals. Considering population growth rates when assessing weed management strategies is key to determining the sustainability of the crop production operation.}, number={2}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, author={Oreja, Fernando H. and Hare, Andrew T. and Jordan, David L. and Leon, Ramon G.}, year={2023}, month={Dec} }
 @article{jordan_hare_wells_2022, title={Peanut response to a commercial blend of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and fulvic acid}, volume={8}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, DOI={10.1002/cft2.20180}, abstractNote={Core Ideas
A commercial blend of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and fulvic acid did not affect peanut yield.
Lack of response to the foliar product was consistent across diverse environments.
A commercial blend of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and fulvic acid is not recommended.
}, number={2}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, author={Jordan, David L. and Hare, Andrew T. and Wells, Randy}, year={2022} }
 @article{mahoney_jordan_hare_leon_roma-burgos_vann_jennings_everman_cahoon_2021, title={Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Growth and Seed Production When in Competition with Peanut and Other Crops in North Carolina}, volume={11}, ISSN={["2073-4395"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091734}, DOI={10.3390/agronomy11091734}, abstractNote={Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) is a highly competitive weed that can be difficult to manage in many cropping systems. Research to date has not quantified the growth and development of A. palmeri in a manner that allows direct comparisons across cropping systems. Research was conducted to compare the growth, development, and seed production of A. palmeri when competing with corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] when emerging with crops or emerging three weeks after crops emerge. Regardless of when A. palmeri emerged, seed production was greatest and similar in cotton and peanut and exceeded that of corn and soybean; seed production in soybean exceeded that of corn. However, seed production was approximately 10-fold greater when A. palmeri emerged with crops compared with emergence three weeks later. These results illustrate the importance of controlling weeds during the first three weeks of the season relative to contributions of A. palmeri to the weed seed bank and is the first report comparing seed production in presence of these crops in a manner allowing a statistical comparison of seed production and highlighting the importance of crop sequence for seed bank management.}, number={9}, journal={AGRONOMY-BASEL}, publisher={MDPI AG}, author={Mahoney, Denis J. and Jordan, David L. and Hare, Andrew T. and Leon, Ramon G. and Roma-Burgos, Nilda and Vann, Matthew C. and Jennings, Katherine M. and Everman, Wesley J. and Cahoon, Charles W.}, year={2021}, month={Sep} }
 @article{brandenburg_royals_taylor_malone_jordan_hare_2021, title={Responses of tobacco thrips and peanut to imidacloprid and fluopyram}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, DOI={10.1002/cft2.20116}, abstractNote={AbstractTobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds) can reduce peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield if not controlled in many instances in North Carolina and Virginia. Systemic insecticides are often applied in the seed furrow at planting to suppress tobacco thrips and protect peanut yield. Foliar sprays of acephate [N‐(methoxy[methylsulfanyl]phosphoryl)acetamide] are often made regardless of the insecticide applied at planting. Imidacloprid [(NE)‐N‐[1‐([6‐chloropyridin‐3‐yl]methyl)imidazolidin‐2‐ylidene)nitramide] plus fluopyram [N‐(2‐[3‐chloro‐5‐(trifluoromethyl)pyridin‐2‐yl]ethyl)‐2‐(trifluoromethyl)benzamide])] is registered for use in peanut but information in the peer‐reviewed literature is limited regarding its effectiveness in suppressing tobacco thrips and whether or not a foliar application of acephate is needed when this product is used. Peanut injury caused by tobacco thrips was lower when phorate [diethoxy‐(ethylsulfanylmethylsulfanyl)‐sulfanylidene‐λ5‐phosphane] or imidacloprid were applied alone compared with imidacloprid plus fluopyram in 16 trials conducted in North Carolina and Virginia from 2014 to 2020. However, all insecticides applied at planting protected peanut from injury caused by tobacco thrips well enough to prevent yield loss compared with nontreated peanut. Although acephate decreased visible injury caused by tobacco thrips, yield was not affected by acephate regardless of the systemic insecticide applied at planting. The results from these trials indicate that imidacloprid plus fluopyram offers adequate suppression of tobacco thrips to protect yield. Although acephate suppressed tobacco thrips, yield was not affected by acephate.}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, author={Brandenburg, Rick and Royals, Brian and Taylor, Sally and Malone, Sean and Jordan, David and Hare, Andrew}, year={2021}, month={Aug} }
 @article{royals_brandenburg_hare_jordan_taylor_malone_2020, title={Efficacy of chlorantraniliprole on southern corn rootworm in peanut}, volume={6}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, DOI={10.1002/cft2.20045}, abstractNote={The authors report no conflicts of interest.}, number={1}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, author={Royals, Brian and Brandenburg, Rick and Hare, Andrew and Jordan, David and Taylor, Sally and Malone, Sean}, year={2020} }
 @article{hare_jordan_leon_edmisten_post_cahoon_everman_mahoney_inman_2020, title={Influence of timing and intensity of weed management on crop yield and contribution to weed emergence in cotton the following year}, volume={6}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20021}, DOI={10.1002/cft2.20021}, abstractNote={AbstractAdequate weed control is important in protecting crop yield and allowing efficient harvest in North Carolina. Data in the literature are limited with respect to direct comparisons of weed control and yield across multiple crops. Research is also limited in terms of documenting the impact of weed control in one crop on weed populations in the crop planted the following season. Experiments were conducted in North Carolina to determine weed control and yield of corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in the same experiment when herbicides were applied postemergence at different timings (Year 1) and to determine how weed control translated into weed populations and cotton yield the following year (Year 2). Herbicides were applied 2 or 6 wk after planting (WAP); 2 and 4 WAP; 4 and 6 WAP; and 2, 4, and 6 WAP. At Lewiston‐Woodville, common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) and Texas millet (Urochloa texana L.) were present. At Rocky Mount, Palmer amaranth (Amanthus palmeri S. Wats) and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis L.) were present. A single postemergence application of herbicide protected yield from weed interference in corn, whereas in most instances multiple herbicide applications were needed in cotton and to a degree in soybean. Weed densities in Year 2 in cotton were negatively correlated with weed control the previous year in corn, cotton, and soybean. Densities of common ragweed and Palmer amaranth 3 WAP in Year 2 were higher in cotton when the preceding crop was cotton or soybean rather than corn when herbicides were not applied; no difference was noted when comparing cotton and soybean. In some instances, sequential applications of herbicides resulted in lower weed densities the following year in cotton. These results demonstrate the importance of timely, sequential herbicide applications for weed control in cotton and soybean and in some instances the positive benefits on weed populations the following year in cotton.}, number={1}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, publisher={Wiley}, author={Hare, Andrew T. and Jordan, David L. and Leon, Ramon G. and Edmisten, Keith L. and Post, Angela R. and Cahoon, Charles W. and Everman, Wesley J. and Mahoney, Denis J. and Inman, Matthew D.}, year={2020} }
 @article{jordan_hare_johnson_alston_alston_ambrose_callis_corbett_hoggard_stevens_et al._2020, title={Peanut and soybean response to cropping systems including corn, cotton, and grain sorghum}, volume={6}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, DOI={10.1002/cft2.20041}, abstractNote={The authors declare no conflict of interest.}, number={1}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, author={Jordan, David and Hare, Andrew and Johnson, Dewayne and Alston, Joel and Alston, Trevor and Ambrose, Derek and Callis, David and Corbett, Tommy and Hoggard, Riley and Stevens, Brian and et al.}, year={2020} }
 @article{hare_jordan_edmisten_leon_post_vann_dunphy_heiniger_collins_washburn_2020, title={Response of agronomic crops to planting date and double-cropping with wheat}, volume={112}, ISSN={["1435-0645"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20164}, DOI={10.1002/agj2.20164}, abstractNote={AbstractPlanting date can affect crop yield and is an important management decision for practitioners. Although wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] can be effectively double‐cropped in North Carolina, if commodity prices and projected economic returns are higher for crops other than soybean, growers might consider a nontraditional, double‐crop system. Direct comparisons of major agronomic crops with different planting dates or in a double‐crop system with wheat are limited in North Carolina. Therefore, research was conducted in North Carolina from 2013 through 2017 to determine yield potential of corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), and soybean planted at two dates within the recommended planting window for full‐season production versus planting these crops after wheat harvest. The experimental design was a split plot, with summer crop serving as the whole plot unit and planting date within a crop serving as the subplot unit. Yield of corn, cotton, grain sorghum, peanut, and soybean in full‐season production exceeded that of double‐cropping with wheat in 5, 5, 2, 4, and 5 yr out of 5 yr of the study, respectively. Estimated economic returns were generated using the 10‐yr average (2008–2017) summer crop prices with the 10‐yr average wheat price. When considering all possible combinations of years and crops (n = 25), in only 20% of the possible combinations was the economic return of the double‐cropping system greater than economic return of full‐season crop production when compared with at least one of the planting dates within the traditional planting window.}, number={3}, journal={AGRONOMY JOURNAL}, publisher={Wiley}, author={Hare, Andrew T. and Jordan, David L. and Edmisten, Keith L. and Leon, Ramon G. and Post, Angela R. and Vann, Rachel and Dunphy, E. James and Heiniger, Ronnie and Collins, Guy and Washburn, Derek}, year={2020}, pages={1972–1980} }
 @article{mahoney_jordan_hare_roma-burgos_jennings_leon_vann_everman_cahoon_2021, title={The influence of soybean population and POST herbicide application timing on in-season and subsequent-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control and economic returns}, volume={35}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1017/wet.2020.87}, abstractNote={AbstractOverreliance on herbicides for weed control has led to the evolution of herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth populations. Farm managers should consider the long-term consequences of their short-term management decisions, especially when considering the soil weed seedbank. The objectives of this research were to (1) determine how soybean population and POST herbicide application timing affects in-season Palmer amaranth control and soybean yield, and (2) how those variables influence Palmer amaranth densities and cotton yields the following season. Soybeans were planted (19-cm row spacing) at a low-, medium-, and high-density population (268,000, 546,000, and 778,000 plants ha–1, respectively). Fomesafen and clethodim (280 and 210 g ai ha–1, respectively) were applied at the VE, V1, or V2 to V3 soybean growth stage. Nontreated plots were also included to assess the effect of soybean population alone. The following season, cotton was planted into these plots so as to understand the effects of soybean planting population on Palmer amaranth densities in the subsequent crop. When an herbicide application occurred at the V1 or V2 to V3 soybean stage, weed control in the high-density soybean population increased 17% to 23% compared to the low-density population. Economic return was not influenced by soybean population and was increased 72% to 94% with herbicide application compared to no treatment. In the subsequent cotton crop, Palmer amaranth densities were 24% to 39% lower 3 wk after planting when following soybean sprayed with herbicides compared to soybean without herbicides. Additionally, Palmer amaranth densities in cotton were 19% lower when soybean was treated at the VE stage compared to later stages. Thus, increasing soybean population can improve Palmer amaranth control without adversely affecting economic returns and can reduce future weed densities. Reducing the weed seedbank and selection pressure from herbicides are critical in mitigating resistance evolution.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Mahoney, Denis J. and Jordan, David L. and Hare, Andrew T. and Roma-Burgos, Nilda and Jennings, Katherine M. and Leon, Ramon G. and Vann, Matthew C. and Everman, Wesley J. and Cahoon, Charles W.}, year={2021}, month={Feb}, pages={106–112} }
 @article{jordan_hare_2019, title={Response of Peanut to Foliar Application of Sodium Silicate}, volume={5}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, DOI={10.2134/cftm2019.07.0056}, abstractNote={Core Ideas Sodium silicate applied after emergence to peanut does not increase yield. When pests are controlled via conventional production, systems sodium silicate does not influence peanut yield. Sodium silicate demonstrated no value in typical peanut production systems in North Carolina.}, number={1}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, author={Jordan, David L. and Hare, Andrew T.}, year={2019}, month={Nov} }
 @article{jordan_hare_roberson_ward_shew_brandenburg_anco_thomas_balota_mehl_et al._2019, title={Survey of Practices by Growers in the Virginia-Carolina Region Regarding Digging and Harvesting Peanut}, volume={5}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, DOI={10.2134/cftm2019.07.0057}, abstractNote={Core Ideas Harvesting peanut requires approximately twice as much time to complete as the time required for digging peanut. Fifty-six percent of growers predicted when optimum yield would occur based on the sample provided within the recommended timeframe. Reported yield was positively correlated with the use of prohexadione calcium.}, number={1}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, author={Jordan, David L. and Hare, Andrew T. and Roberson, Gary T. and Ward, Jason and Shew, Barbara B. and Brandenburg, Rick L. and Anco, Dan and Thomas, James and Balota, Maria and Mehl, Hillary and et al.}, year={2019}, month={Nov} }
 @article{mahoney_jordan_hare_leon_vann_burgos_jennings_2019, title={The Effect of Nozzle Selection and Carrier Volume on Weed Control in Soybean in North Carolina}, volume={5}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, DOI={10.2134/cftm2019.05.0037}, abstractNote={Core Ideas Nozzle selection did not affect PRE or POST herbicide efficacy. Carrier volumes from 7.5 to 60 gal/acre generally provided similar weed control. Soybean yield was not affected by nozzle selection or carrier volume. Lower carrier volumes may provide increased farm efficiency.}, number={1}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, author={Mahoney, Denis J. and Jordan, David L. and Hare, Andrew T. and Leon, Ramon G. and Vann, Matthew C. and Burgos, Nilda R. and Jennings, Katherine M.}, year={2019}, month={Oct} }
 @article{mahoney_jordan_hare_leon_vann_burgos_jennings_2019, title={The Influence of Postemergence Herbicide Timing and Frequency on Weed Control and Soybean Yield}, volume={5}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, DOI={10.2134/cftm2019.05.0036}, abstractNote={Core Ideas Optimizing herbicide timing and frequency for weed control in soybean is critical. Two or more postemergence herbicide applications were required in twin- and narrow-row soybean. Herbicide programs generally provided similar soybean yield. More intensive herbicide programs did not reduce economic returns. Understanding optimal herbicide timing and frequency is critical for mitigating weed seed return to the soil seedbank and maximizing crop yields. Research was conducted over 2016–2018 in North Carolina to determine postemergence-only herbicide application timing and the frequency necessary for adequate weed control, soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield, and economic return in twin- and narrow-row soybean. Predominant weeds included common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.], Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S.Watson), and Texas millet [Urochloa texana (Buckley) R.D.Webster]. Four postemergence timings included early (EPOST), mid-postemergence, late, and very late postemergence (VLPOST) applications in various combinations. An untreated control was included for comparison. Regardless of planting pattern, broadleaf weed control was 9 to 48% higher when herbicides were applied two or more times than with single EPOST or VLPOST-only applications. Generally, two to three applications were needed to provide 100% annual grass control, whereas single applications only provided 71 to 92% control. Applying herbicides increased yield by 21 to 46% when compared with untreated soybean. In treated soybean, yield following the VLPOST treatment was generally lower than under other regimes. Trends for economic return were similar to those of yield. The data illustrate that multiple postemergence applications are needed for adequate weed control and do not adversely affect net returns. Although yields were protected with the EPOST-only treatment, caution must be taken to mitigate returning weed seed to the soil seedbank, as control for this treatment was lower than when herbicides were applied multiple times.}, number={1}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, author={Mahoney, Denis J. and Jordan, David L. and Hare, Andrew T. and Leon, Ramon G. and Vann, Matthew C. and Burgos, Nilda R. and Jennings, Katherine M.}, year={2019}, month={Nov} }
 @article{jordan_johnson_hare_anco_chapin_thomas_monfort_balota_2018, title={Influence of Inoculation with Bradyrhizobia and Nitrogen Rate on Yield and Estimated Economic Return of Virginia Market-Type Peanut}, volume={4}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, DOI={10.2134/cftm2018.01.0002}, abstractNote={Core Ideas
Bradyrhizobia inoculant increases peanut yield in new peanut fields and in fields with a recent history of peanut.
Applied nitrogen is less effective than inoculation with Bradyrhizobia in new peanut fields.
Return on investment from Bradyrhizobia inoculant occurs regardless of field history relative to peanut production.
Adequate nitrogen (N) fixation by peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is essential to optimize yield. In replicated trials in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia from 1998–2017, commercially available in‐furrow liquid or granular inoculant increased yield from 3460 to 4660 lb/acre in new peanut fields (52 trials) and 4280 to 4450 lb/acre in fields with a previous history of peanut plantings within the past 4 years (43 trials). The increase in economic value from inoculation treatment ($8/acre) at a peanut price of $535/ton was $318/acre and $41/acre in fields with these respective histories. In a second experiment, replicated trials were conducted from 2007–2017 in fields without a history of peanut production or fields not rotated to peanut within at least the past 20 years. Economic return based on peanut prices described previously was determined to reflect cost of N applied as ammonium sulfate ($0.28/lb ammonium sulfate) as a single application 45 to 60 days after planting when canopy foliage began to express N deficiency. A linear or quadratic response to rates of 0, 60, 90, 120, and 150 lb N/acre was noted in five trials with no response observed in the remaining four trials. When these experiments were included with five other experiments where non‐inoculated and inoculated controls were compared with one rate only (120 lb N/acre), yield and economic return were greater for inoculated peanut compared with peanut receiving N or the non‐inoculated and non‐fertilized control. Nitrogen increased peanut yield and economic return compared with the non‐fertilized control. Results from these experiments underscore the value of inoculation with Bradyrhizobia at planting regardless of field history and the limitations of applied N to correct N deficiencies in peanut.}, number={1}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, author={Jordan, David L. and Johnson, P. Dewayne and Hare, Andrew T. and Anco, Dan and Chapin, Jay and Thomas, James and Monfort, Scott and Balota, Maria}, year={2018}, month={Oct} }
 @article{jordan_hare_roberson_shew_brandenburg_anco_balota_mehl_taylor_2018, title={Summary of Variables Associated with Application of Plant Protection Products in Peanut}, volume={4}, ISSN={["2374-3832"]}, DOI={10.2134/cftm2018.05.0034}, abstractNote={Core Ideas
Peanut acreage was positively correlated with tank size, boom width, and ground speed.
Peanut acreage was not correlated with peanut yield, spray volume, and spray pressure.
Co‐applying three or more products in the same tank was common among growers.
Flat‐fan nozzles were the most commonly used spray nozzles among peanut growers.
Growers spend approximately 18% of their time applying crop protection products.
}, number={1}, journal={CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT}, author={Jordan, David L. and Hare, Andrew T. and Roberson, Gary T. and Shew, Barbara B. and Brandenburg, Rick L. and Anco, Dan and Balota, Maria and Mehl, Hillary and Taylor, Sally}, year={2018}, month={Oct} }