@article{fang_zhang_bowman_jones_kuraparthy_2021, title={Registration of two germplasm lines with improved lint yield and fiber elongation in upland cotton}, volume={15}, ISSN={["1940-3496"]}, url={https://publons.com/wos-op/publon/54751099/}, DOI={10.1002/plr2.20121}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={2}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Fang, Hui and Zhang, Kuang and Bowman, Daryl T. and Jones, Don C. and Kuraparthy, Vasu}, year={2021}, month={May}, pages={359–365} }
 @article{fang_bowman_zhang_zhu_jones_kuraparthy_2019, title={Registration of Four Germplasm Lines of Upland Cotton with High Fiber Quality}, volume={13}, ISSN={["1940-3496"]}, url={https://publons.com/wos-op/publon/31419926/}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2019.02.0005crg}, abstractNote={Four upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm lines, NC18‐11 (Reg. no. GP‐1056, PI 690771), NC18‐12 (Reg. no. GP‐1057, PI 690772), NC18‐13 (Reg. no. GP‐1058, PI 690773), and NC18‐14 (Reg. no. GP‐1059, PI 690774), were developed by the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences at North Carolina State University. These four cotton lines had improved fiber quality traits and exhibited 915.5 to 1180.9 kg ha−1 lint yield. All four lines were derived from a random mated population using multiple parental lines. The four lines were compared with commercial cultivars ‘DP393’, ‘Sure‐Grow 747’, and ‘UA48’ over 2 yr using a replicated randomized complete block design in Clayton, NC. Lines NC18‐11, NC18‐12, and NC18‐13 had significantly (p = 0.05) better micronaire values than the checks and significantly higher strength values (8.3–25.3%) than DP393, Sure‐Grow 747, and the parental lines. These three lines also had significantly (p = 0.05) greater upper half mean length values (4.9–11.6%) than DP393 and Sure‐Grow 747. Germplasm line NC18‐14 had a 15.4 to 62.5% significantly (p = 0.05) higher fiber elongation value than all checks and parental lines and showed 5.0 to 12.8% more lint fraction than the checks. These lines could be additional sources of genetic variability for cotton breeding programs focusing on improving fiber quality traits while still producing more than 900 kg ha−1 of lint.}, number={3}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Fang, Hui and Bowman, Daryl T. and Zhang, Kuang and Zhu, Linglong and Jones, Don C. and Kuraparthy, Vasu}, year={2019}, month={Sep}, pages={401–405} }
 @article{fang_zhang_bowman_jones_kuraparthy_2019, title={Registration of Four Germplasm Lines of Upland Cotton with High Lint Yield}, volume={13}, ISSN={["1940-3496"]}, url={https://publons.com/wos-op/publon/31419922/}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2018.12.0079crg}, abstractNote={Four upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) lines, NC18‐07 (Reg. no. GP‐1052, PI 690767), NC18‐08 (Reg. no. GP‐1053, PI 690768), NC18‐09 (Reg. no. GP‐1054, PI 690769), and NC18‐10 (Reg. no. GP‐1055, PI 690770), were developed by the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences at North Carolina State University. The four upland cotton lines have improved yield production and some good fiber quality traits. All four lines were derived from a random mated population using multiple parental lines. These four lines were compared with commercial check cultivars ‘DP393’, ‘Sure‐Grow 747’, and ‘UA48’ over 2 yr in Clayton, NC. NC18‐07 produced 7.6 to 34.2% greater lint yields than that of the checks and had 15.2% greater elongation value than that of UA48. NC18‐08 produced 5.9 to 32.1% greater lint yield than the checks. NC18‐09 yielded 2.2 to 27.5% greater lint than checks and showed 44.7 and 22.3% greater elongation values than that of UA48 and parental lines, respectively. Germplasm line NC18‐10 produced 1.0 to 26.0% greater lint yield than the commercial checks and also displayed 26.5 and 7.0% greater elongation values than that of UA48 and parental lines, respectively. These lines could be valuable sources for cotton breeding and programs focusing on improving yield as well as fiber elongation.}, number={3}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Fang, Hui and Zhang, Kuang and Bowman, Daryl T. and Jones, Don C. and Kuraparthy, Vasu}, year={2019}, month={Sep}, pages={396–400} }
 @article{kaur_kuraparthy_bacheler_fang_bowman_2018, title={Screening Germplasm and Quantification of Components Contributing to Thrips Resistance in Cotton}, volume={111}, ISSN={["1938-291X"]}, url={https://publons.com/wos-op/publon/31419923/}, DOI={10.1093/jee/toy201}, abstractNote={Abstract Three hundred and ninety-one Gossypium hirsutum and 34 Gossypium barbadense accessions were screened for thrips resistance under field conditions at the Upper Coastal Plain Research Station in Rocky Mount, North Carolina in years 2014 and 2015. Visual damage ratings, thrips counts, and seedling dry weights were recorded at 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 wk after planting, respectively. Population density and thrips arrival times varied between years. Data from the three separate damage scoring dates provided a better estimate of resistance or susceptibility to thrips than ratings from the individual dates over the season. Tobacco thrips [Frankliniella fusca (Hinds) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)], followed by western flower thrips [Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)], were the dominant thrips species observed in the study. Five resistant G. barbadense accessions and five moderately resistant upland cotton accessions were identified from field evaluations. Greenhouse experiments were conducted in Fall 2015 and Spring 2016 to determine if plant height, growth rate, leaf pubescence, and leaf area were significantly different in resistant and susceptible groups of G. hirsutum and G. barbadense accessions identified from the field screenings. Leaf pubescence and relative growth rate were significantly higher in resistant accessions compared with susceptible accessions in absence of thrips. There was no difference for plant height and leaf area between resistant and susceptible groups. Results suggest thrips-resistant plants have a possible competitive advantage through faster growth and higher trichome density, which limits thrips movement.}, number={5}, journal={JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY}, publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)}, author={Kaur, Baljinder and Kuraparthy, Vasu and Bacheler, Jack and Fang, Hui and Bowman, Daryl T.}, year={2018}, month={Oct}, pages={2426–2434} }
 @article{andres_coneva_frank_tuttle_samayoa_han_kaur_zhu_fang_bowman_et al._2017, title={Modifications to a LATE MERISTEM IDENTITY1 gene are responsible for the major leaf shapes of Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)}, volume={114}, DOI={10.1101/062612}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={1}, journal={Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, author={Andres, R. J. and Coneva, V. and Frank, M. H. and Tuttle, J. R. and Samayoa, L. F. and Han, S. W. and Kaur, B. and Zhu, L. L. and Fang, Hui and Bowman, D. T. and et al.}, year={2017}, pages={E57–66} }
 @article{bowman_bourland_kuraparthy_2016, title={Measuring maturity in cotton cultivar trials}, volume={20}, number={1}, journal={Journal of Cotton Science}, author={Bowman, D. T. and Bourland, F. and Kuraparthy, V.}, year={2016}, pages={40–45} }
 @article{andres_bowman_kaur_kuraparthy_2014, title={Mapping and genomic targeting of the major leaf shape gene (L) in Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)}, volume={127}, ISSN={["1432-2242"]}, DOI={10.1007/s00122-013-2208-4}, abstractNote={A major leaf shape locus (L) was mapped with molecular markers and genomically targeted to a small region in the D-genome of cotton. By using expression analysis and candidate gene mapping, two LMI1 -like genes are identified as possible candidates for leaf shape trait in cotton. Leaf shape in cotton is an important trait that influences yield, flowering rates, disease resistance, lint trash, and the efficacy of foliar chemical application. The leaves of okra leaf cotton display a significantly enhanced lobing pattern, as well as ectopic outgrowths along the lobe margins when compared with normal leaf cotton. These phenotypes are the hallmark characteristics of mutations in various known modifiers of leaf shape that culminate in the mis/over-expression of Class I KNOX genes. To better understand the molecular and genetic processes underlying leaf shape in cotton, a normal leaf accession (PI607650) was crossed to an okra leaf breeding line (NC05AZ21). An F2 population of 236 individuals confirmed the incompletely dominant single gene nature of the okra leaf shape trait in Gossypium hirsutum L. Molecular mapping with simple sequence repeat markers localized the leaf shape gene to 5.4 cM interval in the distal region of the short arm of chromosome 15. Orthologous mapping of the closely linked markers with the sequenced diploid D-genome (Gossypium raimondii) tentatively resolved the leaf shape locus to a small genomic region. RT-PCR-based expression analysis and candidate gene mapping indicated that the okra leaf shape gene (L (o) ) in cotton might be an upstream regulator of Class I KNOX genes. The linked molecular markers and delineated genomic region in the sequenced diploid D-genome will assist in the future high-resolution mapping and map-based cloning of the leaf shape gene in cotton.}, number={1}, journal={THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS}, author={Andres, Ryan J. and Bowman, Daryl T. and Kaur, Baljinder and Kuraparthy, Vasu}, year={2014}, month={Jan}, pages={167–177} }
 @article{hutmacher_ulloa_wright_campbell_percy_wallace_myers_bourland_weaver_chee_et al._2013, title={Elite Upland Cotton Germplasm-Pool Assessment of Fusarium Wilt Resistance in California}, volume={105}, ISSN={["1435-0645"]}, DOI={10.2134/agronj2013.0264}, abstractNote={During the past 9 yr, a new race of Fusarium (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum [FOV Race 4]) has increasingly impacted cotton (Gossypium spp.) in the San Joaquin Valley of California. To assess the vulnerability of upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.) in California to FOV disease, elite upland germplasm lines from 13 U.S. public breeding programs across the Cotton Belt and commercial cultivars were evaluated for disease resistance to FOV Races 1 and 4. Ten independent replicated field trials were conducted: three in 2008, four in 2010, and three in 2011. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) were observed for disease severity index of leaves, vascular root staining, and plant survival values among the elite germplasm lines in all 3 yr for the levels of resistance–response to FOV Races 1 and 4. Also, significant interactions among germplasm lines, FOV races (1 and 4), and evaluation sites indicated that germplasm lines differed in mechanisms of plant‐defense response for the two FOV races. Selected lines from programs in the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi showed at least a moderate level of tolerance to both FOV races; however, several of these lines produced weak and coarse fibers. Based on these evaluations, many of the entries in public breeders’ current elite upland germplasm pools may be more susceptible than expected to some FOV races, and sources of acceptable levels of resistance may be limited when tested under infestation levels that resulted in only 5 to 35% plant survival in susceptible check cultivars.}, number={6}, journal={AGRONOMY JOURNAL}, author={Hutmacher, Robert B. and Ulloa, Mauricio and Wright, Steven D. and Campbell, B. Todd and Percy, Richard and Wallace, Ted and Myers, Gerald and Bourland, Fred and Weaver, David and Chee, Peng and et al.}, year={2013}, pages={1635–1644} }
 @article{kuraparthy_bowman_jones_2013, title={Registration of NC05AZ21 Okra-Leaf and NC05-11 Normal-Leaf Upland Cotton Germplasms}, volume={7}, ISSN={["1936-5209"]}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2013.03.0011crg}, abstractNote={NC05AZ21 (Reg. No. GP‐966, PI 667659) is an okra‐leaf line and NC05‐11 (Reg. No., GP‐965, PI 667658) is a normal‐leaf line of Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). NC05AZ21 was developed from a cross of NC 72 and an unknown okra leaf, red stem line from Louisiana while NC05‐11 was developed from a cross of NC 72 and Fiber Max 989 (FM 989). NC 72 is a normal and smooth leaf line. FM 989 is a commercial, normal‐leaf cultivar. A pedigree breeding method was followed in developing these lines. Both lines were compared with two commercial cultivars across multiple environments for agronomic traits. Line NC05AZ21 was also compared with a commercial okra‐leaf cultivar FM 832 for agronomic performance. NC05AZ21 showed superior lint yield and lint percentage to and comparable fiber length as FM 832. It had a lower lint yield but longer fibers than Deltapine 455BG/RR (DP 455BG/RR) and Stoneville 5327B2RF (ST 5327B2RF) and comparable fiber strength. It has good resistance to Fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlet.f.sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. &Hans.] as well. It could be a good source of earliness and Fusarium wilt resistance and perhaps tolerance to boll rot (caused by numerous organisms)—the latter because of its okra‐leaf shape. NC05‐11 had comparable lint yields as DP 451BG/RR and DP 455BG/RR with superior fiber length and strength. It also had good resistance to Fusarium wilt. Both NC05AZ21 and NC05‐11 could prove to be valuable sources of additional genetic variability for cotton breeding programs having an emphasis on improving Fusarium wilt resistance and fiber quality.}, number={3}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Kuraparthy, Vasu and Bowman, Daryl T. and Jones, Don C.}, year={2013}, month={Sep}, pages={334–338} }
 @article{cardinal_wang_bowman_pantalone_2012, title={Registration of 'NC-Burton' Soybean}, volume={6}, ISSN={["1936-5209"]}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2010.12.0720crc}, abstractNote={‘NC‐Burton’ soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (Reg. No. CV‐504, PI 664026) was cooperatively developed and released by North Carolina State University (NCSU) and the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, and it was first tested in North Carolina yield trials in 2003. NC‐Burton is a determinate, maturity‐group‐V, high‐yielding, conventional cultivar adapted to the northern and central regions of eastern North Carolina. It was derived from the cross of the high‐yielding line TN93‐99 and the soybean cyst nematode–resistant cultivar ‘Fowler’. In the NCSU breeding trials (11 environments), NC‐Burton averaged 3466 kg ha−1, or 441 kg ha−1 more than the check cultivar ‘5601T’ under full‐season conditions. In eight average‐ to high‐yield environments in the North Carolina Official Variety Trials, NC‐Burton had a significantly higher seed yield (4091 kg ha−1) than 5601T in narrow (19‐cm) row spacing. Seed protein content was lower but the oil content was similar to that of 5601T. NC‐Burton is resistant to stem canker (caused by Diaporthe phaseolorum var. meridionalis), frogeye leaf spot (caused by Cercospora sojina Hara), and bacterial pustule [caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycines (Nakano) Dye].}, number={2}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Cardinal, A. J. and Wang, S. and Bowman, D. T. and Pantalone, V. R.}, year={2012}, month={May}, pages={146–149} }
 @article{burton_miranda_carter_bowman_2012, title={Registration of 'NC-Miller' Soybean with High Yield and High Seed-Oil Content}, volume={6}, ISSN={["1940-3496"]}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2012.01.0007crc}, abstractNote={‘NC‐Miller’ (Reg. No. CV‐505, PI 665018) soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] was developed and released by the USDA‐ARS in 2011 as a high‐yielding and high‐oil late maturity group V, conventional cultivar. NC‐Miller is an F5 selection from the cross of cultivars ‘Santee’ and ‘Holladay’. In the North Carolina Official Variety Trials for late maturity group V (2007–2010), yields of NC‐Miller were either greater than or equivalent to those of other conventional cultivars. Also, in yield trials conducted by the USDA‐ARS soybean breeding program in North Carolina (2003–2008) and in the USDA Preliminary and Regional Tests (2008–2010), the mean yield of NC‐Miller was comparable with that of the check cultivars. NC‐Miller has higher seed‐oil concentration (216 g kg−1) in comparison with the check cultivars ‘AG 5606’ (205 g kg−1), ‘5601T’ (204 g kg−1) and ‘Osage’(197 g kg−1). It has a determinate growth habit, purple flowers, gray pubescence, and tan pod walls. It is resistant to Soybean mosaic virus and moderately resistant to sudden death syndrome [caused by Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. f. sp. glycines]. NC‐Miller's attributes of high seed oil concentration and good yield provide an added value to soybean crushers.}, number={3}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Burton, J. W. and Miranda, L. M. and Carter, T. E., Jr. and Bowman, D. T.}, year={2012}, month={Sep}, pages={294–297} }
 @article{cardinal_wang_bowman_pantalone_2012, title={Registration of 'NC-Tinius' Soybean}, volume={6}, ISSN={["1936-5209"]}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2010.12.0721crc}, abstractNote={‘NC‐Tinius’ soybean [Glycine max (L.,) Merr.] (Reg. No. CV‐503, PI 664027) was cooperatively developed and released by North Carolina State University (NCSU) and the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service. It was first tested in North Carolina yield trials in 2003. NC‐Tinius is a determinate, maturity‐group‐V, conventional cultivar. It is a high‐yielding conventional line adapted to the northern and central regions of eastern North Carolina. It was derived from the cross of the low‐palmitate and low‐linolenate conventional line TN99‐76,077 to a high‐yielding conventional line V91‐3036. In the NCSU breeding trials (11 environments), NC‐Tinius averaged 3443 kg ha−1, or 353 kg ha−1 more than ‘5601T’, under full‐season conditions. In eight average‐ to high‐yield environments in the North Carolina Official Variety Trials, NC‐Tinius produced significantly higher yields (4031 kg ha−1) than did the standard cultivar 5601T in narrow (19 cm) row spacing. Seed protein and oil contents were similar to those of 5601T. NC‐Tinius is resistant to Soybean mosaic virus (G1), frogeye leaf spot (caused by Cercospora sojina Hara), bacterial pustule [caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycines (Nakano) Dye], and stem canker (caused by Diaporthe phaseolorum var. meridionalis) and is moderately resistant to sudden death syndrome (caused by Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines).}, number={2}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Cardinal, A. J. and Wang, S. and Bowman, D. T. and Pantalone, V. R.}, year={2012}, month={May}, pages={150–155} }
 @article{campbell_chee_lubbers_bowman_meredith_johnson_fraser_2011, title={Genetic Improvement of the Pee Dee Cotton Germplasm Collection following Seventy Years of Plant Breeding}, volume={51}, ISSN={["1435-0653"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2010.09.0545}, abstractNote={One of the most significant, long‐term public U.S. Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm enhancement programs is known as the Pee Dee germplasm program. The unique, genetic foundation of the Pee Dee germplasm was created using germplasm from Upland, Sea Island (Gossypium barbadense L.), and primitive diploid cottons. Since the program's inception in 1935, the Pee Dee germplasm program has released >80 improved germplasm lines and cultivars. In this study, the agronomic and fiber quality performance of Pee Dee germplasm was evaluated across southeastern U.S. environments to estimate genetic improvement within the Pee Dee germplasm program. Results suggest that the Pee Dee germplasm enhancement program has (i) maintained usable genetic variation and (ii) maintained high fiber quality potential while concomitantly improving agronomic performance. Although the results highlight the need to continue improving lint percent, lint yield, and bolls m−2, there is also evidence to suggest that Pee Dee germplasm can continue being utilized to develop the next generation of high‐fiber‐quality and high‐yielding cotton cultivars.}, number={3}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Campbell, B. T. and Chee, P. W. and Lubbers, E. and Bowman, D. T. and Meredith, W. R., Jr. and Johnson, J. and Fraser, D. E.}, year={2011}, month={May}, pages={955–968} }
 @article{carter_koenning_burton_rzewnicki_villagarcia_bowman_arelli_2011, title={Registration of 'N7003CN' Maturity-Group-VII Soybean with High Yield and Resistance to Race 2 (HG Type 1.2.5.7-) Soybean Cyst Nematode}, volume={5}, ISSN={["1940-3496"]}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2010.09.0565crc}, abstractNote={‘N7003CN’ soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (Reg. No. CV‐502, PI 661157) was developed and released by the USDA‐ARS in 2010. It is a high‐yielding, maturity‐group (MG) VII, nontransgenic soybean cultivar adapted to the southeastern USA (30–37° N latitude). N7003CN is the first publicly released MG‐VII soybean that is resistant to race 2 (HG type 1.2.5.7) of the soybean cyst nematode (SCN; Heterodera glycines Ichinohe). Race 2 is the dominant type of SCN in North Carolina. N7003CN is also resistant to races 1 and 14 (HG types 2.3‐ and 1.3.5.6.7, respectively), is moderately resistant to races 4 and 5 (HG types 1.2.3.5.6‐ and 2.5.7‐, respectively), and appears to have partial resistance to race 3 (HG type 5.7). Molecular analysis of N7003CN identified SSR markers associated with SCN resistance genes rhg1, Rhg4, and Rhg5. During 2005–2009 in USDA Uniform Soybean Tests, N7003CN yielded 11 and 2% more than the SCN‐susceptible control cultivars ‘Haskell RR’ and ‘N7002’, respectively (46 environments). During 2005–2009 in the North Carolina State University Official Variety Trials (OVT), the yield of N7003CN was equivalent to that of the SCN‐susceptible control cultivar, ‘NC‐Raleigh’. NC‐Raleigh was the highest‐yielding MG‐VII entry in the OVT. The unusual combination of high yield and SCN race‐2 resistance in group‐VII maturity makes this cultivar potentially desirable for conventional and organic production and as breeding stock for commercial breeding.}, number={3}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Carter, T. E., Jr. and Koenning, S. R. and Burton, J. W. and Rzewnicki, P. E. and Villagarcia, M. R. and Bowman, D. T. and Arelli, P. R.}, year={2011}, month={Sep}, pages={309–317} }
 @article{carter_rzewnicki_burton_villagarcia_bowman_taliercio_kwanyuen_2010, title={Registration of N6202 Soybean Germplasm with High Protein, Favorable Yield Potential, Large Seed, and Diverse Pedigree}, volume={4}, ISSN={["1940-3496"]}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2009.08.0462.crg}, abstractNote={‘N6202’ soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (Reg. No. GP‐366, PI 658498) was cooperatively developed and released by the USDA–ARS and the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service in October 2009 as a mid–Maturity Group VI germplasm with high‐protein seed, favorable yield potential, large seed size, and diverse pedigree. The unusual combination of high protein and favorable yield in this germplasm, plus its diverse genetic background, makes it a potentially desirable breeding stock for both specialty and commodity breeding programs. N6202 was developed through conventional breeding and is adapted to the southern United States. Average seed protein level was 457 g kg−1 (zero moisture basis), which was 33 g kg−1 greater (p < 0.05) than that of the control cultivar NC‐Roy. Average yield of N6202 was more than 90% of NC‐Roy over 65 environments. The 100‐seed weight of N6202 (21.4 g) was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than that of the largest‐seeded control cultivar Dillon (15.2 g).Twenty‐five percent of N6202's pedigree is derived from Japanese cultivar Fukuyataka. Fukuyataka is not known to be related to the genetic base of U.S. soybean. An additional 25% of N6202's pedigree traces to the Japanese cultivar Nakasennari, which appears in the pedigree of only one cultivar (its parent ‘N6201’). Thus, the release of N6202 broadens the genetic range of materials adapted for soybean breeding in the United States. N6202 exhibits a moderate level of the bleeding hilum trait in some environments.}, number={1}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Carter, T. E., Jr. and Rzewnicki, P. E. and Burton, J. W. and Villagarcia, M. R. and Bowman, D. T. and Taliercio, Earl and Kwanyuen, P.}, year={2010}, month={Jan}, pages={73–79} }
 @article{yang_wilkerson_buol_bowman_heiniger_2009, title={Estimating Genetic Coefficients for the CSM-CERES-Maize Model in North Carolina Environments}, volume={101}, ISSN={["1435-0645"]}, DOI={10.2134/agronj2008.0234x}, abstractNote={CSM‐CERES‐Maize has been extensively used worldwide to simulate corn growth and grain production, but has not been evaluated for use in North Carolina. The objectives of this study were to calibrate CSM‐CERES‐Maize soil parameters and genetic coefficients using official variety trial data, evaluate model performance in North Carolina, and determine the suitability of the fitting technique using variety trial data for model calibration. The study used yield data for 53 maize genotypes collected from multiple locations over a 10‐yr period. A stepwise calibration procedure was utilized: (i) two genetic coefficients which determine anthesis and physiological maturity dates were adjusted based on growing degree day requirements for each hybrid; and (ii) plant available soil water and rooting profile were adjusted iteratively with two other genetic coefficients affecting yield. Cross validation was used to evaluate the suitability of this approach for estimating soil and genetic coefficients. The root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEPs) were similar to fitting errors. Results indicate that CSM‐CERES‐Maize can be used in North Carolina to simulate corn growth under nonlimiting N conditions and variety trial data can be used for estimating genetic coefficients. Hybrid average simulated yields matched measured yields well across a wide range of environments, and simulated hybrid yield rankings were in close agreement with rankings based on measured yields. Data from several site‐years could not be used in fitting genetic coefficients due to large root mean squared errors. In some cases, this could be attributed to a weather event, such as a late‐season hurricane.}, number={5}, journal={AGRONOMY JOURNAL}, author={Yang, Zhengyu and Wilkerson, Gail G. and Buol, Gregory S. and Bowman, Daryl T. and Heiniger, Ronnie W.}, year={2009}, pages={1276–1285} }
 @article{cole_bowman_bourland_caldwell_campbell_fraser_weaver_2009, title={Impact of Heterozygosity and Heterogeneity on Cotton Lint Yield Stability}, volume={49}, ISSN={["1435-0653"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0450}, abstractNote={ABSTRACT}, number={5}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Cole, C. B. and Bowman, D. T. and Bourland, F. M. and Caldwell, W. D. and Campbell, B. T. and Fraser, D. E. and Weaver, D. B.}, year={2009}, pages={1577–1585} }
 @article{carter_burton_rzewnicki_villagarcia_fountain_bowman_taliercio_2009, title={Registration of 'N8101' Small-Seeded Soybean}, volume={3}, ISSN={["1940-3496"]}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2008.05.0259crc}, abstractNote={‘N8101’ soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (Reg. No. CV‐498, PI 654355) was cooperatively developed and released by the USDA‐ARS and the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service in February 2008 as a small‐seeded Maturity Group VIII conventional cultivar. N8101 is the first publicly released small‐seeded soybean cultivar in its maturity group and has potential use in the Japanese soyfoods market. It was derived from the cross of small‐seeded germplasm NC114 and a small‐seeded cultivar N7101. N8101 is adapted to the southeastern United States between 30 and 36° N latitude. In 22 USDA regional trials, N8101 exhibited a 100‐seed weight of 7.3 g, 5.4 g less than that of control variety, ‘Prichard RR’. Yield of N8101 was approximately 92% of that produced by Prichard RR (2712 kg ha−1). Over seven additional trials in North Carolina, N8101 had a 100‐seed weight of 6.5 g, 1.4 g less than that of small‐seeded Maturity Group VII cultivar N7103. Seed protein content was similar to that of Prichard RR, and seed carbohydrate composition was similar to that of N7103. N8101 is resistant to shattering, Soybean mosaic virus, frogeye leaf spot (Cercospora sojina Hara), and bacterial pustule [Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycines (Nakano) Dye]. The reduced yield of N8101 compared with commodity‐type cultivars limits its use to specialty purposes.}, number={1}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Carter, T. E., Jr. and Burton, J. W. and Rzewnicki, P. E. and Villagarcia, M. R. and Fountain, M. O. and Bowman, D. T. and Taliercio, Earl}, year={2009}, month={Jan}, pages={22–27} }
 @article{campbell_bowman_weaver_2008, title={Heterotic effects in topcrosses of modern and obsolete cotton cultivars}, volume={48}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2007.06.0362}, abstractNote={Historically, reselection, pedigree, and mass‐selection breeding methods have been used to develop open‐pollinated cultivars of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). As a result, modern cotton cultivars should have accumulated additive genetic effects with time, while also possessing fewer nonadditive gene effects than obsolete cultivars. A topcross test was conducted to compare the heterotic effects of obsolete and modern cultivars for yield, yield components, and fiber quality. Significant differences were detected between heterosis values for the modern and obsolete cultivar groups for seed cotton yield, lint yield, lint percentage, and boll weight. No significant heterotic effects were detected for fiber quality. The obsolete group of cultivars showed average lint yield heterosis values of 34% compared with 23% for the modern cultivars. Both cultivar groups displayed significant, but similar heterosis values for the number of bolls per square meter (17 and 15%, respectively). The major yield component associated with lint yield heterosis for both groups was bolls per square meter, although boll weight heterosis also contributed to lint yield heterosis for the obsolete cultivars. Although modern cultivars produced considerable heterotic effects for yield, this study demonstrates that obsolete cultivars may provide an additional source of nonadditive genetic effects that can be exploited in a hybrid production system.}, number={2}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Campbell, B. T. and Bowman, D. T. and Weaver, D. B.}, year={2008}, pages={593–600} }
 @article{carter_burton_fountain_rzewnicki_villagarcia_bowman_2008, title={Registration of 'N8001' Soybean}, volume={2}, ISSN={["1940-3496"]}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2007.03.0121crc}, abstractNote={Journal of Plant RegistrationsVolume 2, Issue 1 p. 22-23 Cultivar Registration of ‘N8001’ Soybean T. E. Carter Jr., Corresponding Author T. E. Carter Jr. thomas.carter@ars.usda.gov USDA-ARS and Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Corresponding author (thomas.carter@ars.usda.gov).Search for more papers by this authorJ. W. Burton, J. W. Burton USDA-ARS and Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorM. O. Fountain, M. O. Fountain USDA-ARS, 3127 Ligon St., Raleigh, NC, 27607Search for more papers by this authorP. E. Rzewnicki, P. E. Rzewnicki USDA-ARS, 3127 Ligon St., Raleigh, NC, 27607Search for more papers by this authorM. R. Villagarcia, M. R. Villagarcia USDA-ARS, 3127 Ligon St., Raleigh, NC, 27607Search for more papers by this authorD. T. Bowman, D. T. Bowman Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this author T. E. Carter Jr., Corresponding Author T. E. Carter Jr. thomas.carter@ars.usda.gov USDA-ARS and Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Corresponding author (thomas.carter@ars.usda.gov).Search for more papers by this authorJ. W. Burton, J. W. Burton USDA-ARS and Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorM. O. Fountain, M. O. Fountain USDA-ARS, 3127 Ligon St., Raleigh, NC, 27607Search for more papers by this authorP. E. Rzewnicki, P. E. Rzewnicki USDA-ARS, 3127 Ligon St., Raleigh, NC, 27607Search for more papers by this authorM. R. Villagarcia, M. R. Villagarcia USDA-ARS, 3127 Ligon St., Raleigh, NC, 27607Search for more papers by this authorD. T. Bowman, D. T. Bowman Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 January 2008 https://doi.org/10.3198/jpr2007.03.0121crcCitations: 14 All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume2, Issue1January 2008Pages 22-23 RelatedInformation}, number={1}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Carter, T. E., Jr. and Burton, J. W. and Fountain, M. O. and Rzewnicki, P. E. and Villagarcia, M. R. and Bowman, D. T.}, year={2008}, month={Jan}, pages={22–23} }
 @article{jenkins_mccarty_gutierrez_hayes_bowman_watson_jones_2008, title={Registration of RMUP-C5, a Random Mated Population of Upland Cotton Germplasm}, volume={2}, ISSN={["1936-5209"]}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2008.02.0080crg}, abstractNote={RMUP‐C5 (Random Mated Upland Population Cycle 5) (Reg. No. GP‐893, PI 652942) is a unique random mated germplasm population of Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) involving six cycles of random mating beginning with an 11 parent half diallel. This germplasm was developed through cooperative research by the USDA‐ARS, Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, North Carolina State Agricultural Experiment Station, and Cotton Incorporated. Parents used in development represented nonrelated or distantly related cultivars or breeding lines from across the U.S. Cotton Belt. The bulked pollen method of pollination was used in the development, and there were six cycles of random mating, with intercrossing of the F1 considered cycle zero. Selfed seed of C5S1 has been released. Changes in correlations between traits among parents, C0, and C5 cycles show that after random mating, the C5 population has recombinations that should be useful for selection and cultivar development. Because this germplasm represents random mating among 11 very diverse breeding programs and includes parents from the major seed breeding companies, this population should be of value to breeders across the U.S. Cotton Belt.}, number={3}, journal={JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS}, author={Jenkins, J. N. and McCarty, J. C., Jr. and Gutierrez, O. A. and Hayes, R. W. and Bowman, D. T. and Watson, C. E. and Jones, D. C.}, year={2008}, month={Sep}, pages={239–242} }
 @article{gingle_yang_chee_may_rong_bowman_lubbers_day_paterson_2006, title={An integrated web resource for cotton}, volume={46}, ISSN={["1435-0653"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2005.09.0328}, abstractNote={“The Cotton Diversity Database” (http://cotton.agtec.uga.edu) is a Web resource for cotton (Gossypium spp.) phenotypic and genomic data. A primary goal for this resource is to provide both a useful management tool for breeders and other applied scientists and a research tool for genetic and genomic scientists. The resource contains four interface suites that include displays for each of the available phenotypic or genomic data types. These display suites are accessible via the genotype portal, a search interface that allows users to begin with a cotton accession and obtain all available data. The phenotypic data displays include graphical views of overall cultivar performance with means and between group standard deviations indicated in an easy‐to‐interpret graphical manner for common trial measures such as lint yield, micronaire, etc. The genomic data displays include interactive graphical views of genetic map and diversity data types. Genetic map data is displayed in both traditional linear and two‐dimensional comparative dot plot formats. Genetic diversity data is displayed in an interactive tree‐based format showing degrees of similarity among genotypes. The data are stored in Oracle relational database (RDBMS) schemas containing tables and views for data storage, auto‐calculated statistics and display parameters. The searchable RDBMS provides flexibility for a wide range of query and search options as well as integration paths amongst the various data types.}, number={5}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Gingle, Alan R. and Yang, Hongyu and Chee, Peng W. and May, O. Lloyd and Rong, Junkang and Bowman, Daryl T. and Lubbers, Edward L. and Day, J. LaDon and Paterson, Andrew H.}, year={2006}, pages={1998–2007} }
 @article{johansson_whitaker_hagler_bowman_slate_payne_2006, title={Predicting aflatoxin and fumonisin in shelled corn lots sing poor-quality grade components}, volume={89}, number={2}, journal={Journal of AOAC International}, author={Johansson, A. S. and Whitaker, T. B. and Hagler, W. M. and Bowman, D. T. and Slate, A. B. and Payne, G.}, year={2006}, pages={433–440} }
 @article{koenning_bowman_morris_2006, title={Quantifying potential tolerance of selected cotton cultivars to Belonolaimus longicaudatus}, volume={38}, number={2}, journal={Journal of Nematology}, author={Koenning, S. R. and Bowman, D. T. and Morris, R. H.}, year={2006}, pages={187–191} }
 @article{burton_carter_fountain_bowman_2006, title={Registration of 'NC-Raleigh' soybean}, volume={46}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2005.11.0410}, abstractNote={Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] germplasm NC-Raleigh (Reg. no. CV-485, PI 641156) was cooperatively developed and released by the USDA-ARS and the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service in May 2002. It has excellent yield potential, small seed, high oil concentration, and resistance to Soybean mosaic virus, stem canker [caused by Diaporthe phaseolorum (Cooke & Ellis) Sacc. var. caulivora Athow & Caldwell], bacterial pustule [caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines (Nakano 1919) Vauterin, Hoste, Kersters & Swings 1995 5 Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycines (Nakano 1919) Dye 1978b], and frogeye leaf spot (caused by Cercospora sojina K. Hara). It is a determinate group VII maturity soybean variety adapted to the southern USA, 27 to 378 N latitude. NC-Raleigh is an F5–derived selection from the cross of USDA breeding line N85–492 and USDA germplasm release N88–480, made in 1991 in North Carolina (Burton andWilson, 1994). N85–492 was derived from the cross of N77–179 3 ‘Johnston’ and is the maternal parent of the soybean cultivar Kuell (Burton et al., 1987; Weaver et al., 2000). N77–179 was selected from the cross of N70–1549 3 N72–3213 and is a parent of soybean cultivars Clifford and Holladay (Burton et al., 1997, 1996). The paternal parent of NC-Raleigh was N88–480, an F3– derived breeding line selected from the fourth cycle of a recurrent selection population improvement program for higher seed oil concentration. The parents of the original population were ‘Arksoy’, ‘Ogden’, ‘Lee’, ‘Roanoke’, D60–8107, ‘Jackson’, and N69–2774 (USDA-ARS National Genetic Resources Program, 2005;Weiss, 1953a, 1953b; Johnson, 1958). D60–8017 was derived from the cross of D51–4877 3 D55–4168. D51– 4877 was derived from Roanoke 3 N45–745. N69–2774 is the original maintainer source for the male-sterile genems1 of unknown pedigree (Brim and Young, 1971). During the winter of 1991–1992, F1 plants were grown at the USDA-ARS Tropical Agriculture Research Station (TARS), Isabela, PR. The F2, F3, and F4 generations were advanced by the single seed descent breeding method (Brim, 1966) at Clayton, NC, in 1992, at TARS in the winter of 1992– 1993, and at Clayton in 1993, respectively. In 1994, individual F5 plants were grown and harvested at Clayton, NC. In 1995, F5:6 plant rows were grown, harvested, and selected for yield and other agronomic traits. Plant row N95–614 was later named NC-Raleigh. During 1999–2001, NC-Raleigh was evaluated in eight environments of the North Carolina State University Official Variety Trials (Bowman, 2001). NC-Raleigh matured the same day as Pioneer variety ‘97B61’. NC-Raleigh yielded 336 kg ha greater than 97B61 (3001 kg ha). Plant height of NC-Raleigh was 2 cm shorter than 97B61 (99 cm) across four environments. During 1998–2000, NC-Raleigh was evaluated at 42 environments in the USDA-ARS Uniform Soybean Tests, Southern States, Group VII (Paris and Shelton, 2000). It matured 3 d later than ‘Benning’ and on the same day as ‘Haskell’, the standard control cultivars for this test (Boerma et al., 1994, 1997). Seed yield of NC-Raleigh was 61 and 115 kg ha greater than Benning (2667 kg ha) and Haskell (2721 kg ha), respectively. The plant height of NC-Raleigh was 5 cm shorter than Benning and Haskell (both were 91 cm). Plant lodging was rated using a scale 1 to 5, where 1 indicates no lodging and 5 is completely lodged at maturity. NC-Raleigh had a plant lodging rating of 2, the same rating as Benning and Haskell. The 100-seed weight of NC-Raleigh (13.1 g) was smaller than that of Benning (13.9 g) or Haskell (15.1 g). The seed protein concentration for NC-Raleigh (401 g kg) was lower than that of Benning (422 g kg) or Haskell (417 g kg). The oil concentration for NC-Raleigh (221 g kg) was greater than that of Benning (201 g kg) or Haskell (198 g kg). NC-Raleigh has white flowers, tawny pubescence, various hila color (brown and black), and tan pod wall color. In USDA regional tests, NC-Raleigh was rated resistant to Soybean mosaic virus and stem canker. It was rated susceptible to soybean cyst (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) and root-knot [Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood and M. arenaria (Neal) Chitwood] nematodes. In USDA trials in North Carolina, NC-Raleigh was rated resistant to frogeye leaf spot and bacterial pustule. It was rated moderately resistant to powdery mildew (caused by Microsphaera diffusa Cooke & Peck). Seed is available fromNorth Carolina Foundation Seed Producers, Inc. (8220 Riley Hill Rd., Zebulon, NC 27597–8773 USA 919–269–5592). Small seed quantities of NC-Raleigh will be available for research purposes from the corresponding author. It is requested that appropriate recognition be made if this germplasm contributes to the development of a new germplasm line or cultivar. Seed will also be deposited in the National Center for Genetic Resources Preservation andNational Plant Germplasm System.}, number={6}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Burton, J. W. and Carter, T. E., Jr. and Fountain, M. O. and Bowman, D. T.}, year={2006}, pages={2710–2711} }
 @article{koenning_bowman_2005, title={Cotton tolerance to Hoplolaimus columbus and impact on population densities}, volume={89}, ISSN={["1943-7692"]}, DOI={10.1094/PD-89-0649}, abstractNote={ Glyphosate-tolerant transgenic-cotton cultivars were evaluated for tolerance to Hoplolaimus columbus in field experiments conducted from 2001 to 2003. The studies were arranged in a split-plot design that included treatment with 1,3-dichloropropene at 42 liter/ha to establish fumigated versus nonfumigated subplots with cultivars as whole plots. Cotton cultivars were divided by relative maturity into two separate but adjacent experiments in order to facilitate cotton defoliation, with 10 early-maturity and 5 late-maturity cultivars. Fumigation was effective in suppressing H. columbus population densities and increased cotton lint yield. The cultivar-fumigation interaction was significant for early-season cotton cultivars but not for late-season cultivars. A tolerance index ([yield of nontreated/yield of treated] × 100) was used to compare cultivar differences. Both groups of cultivars expressed significant levels of tolerance to H. columbus, but late-season cultivars tended to yield more than early-season cultivars in infested fields. }, number={6}, journal={PLANT DISEASE}, author={Koenning, SR and Bowman, DT}, year={2005}, month={Jun}, pages={649–653} }
 @article{york_culpepper_bowman_may_2004, title={Performance of glyphosate-tolerant cotton cultivars in official cultivar trials}, volume={8}, ISBN={1524-3303}, number={4}, journal={Journal of Cotton Science (Online)}, author={York, A. C. and Culpepper, A. S. and Bowman, D. T. and May, O. L.}, year={2004}, pages={261} }
 @article{murphy_navarro_leath_bowman_weisz_ambrose_pate_fountain_2004, title={Registration of 'NC-Neuse' wheat}, volume={44}, ISSN={["1435-0653"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2004.1479}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 44, Issue 4 p. 1479-1480 Registration of Cultivar Registration of ‘NC-Neuse’ Wheat J.P. Murphy, Corresponding Author J.P. Murphy njpm@unity.ncsu.edu Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author (njpm@unity.ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this authorR.A. Navarro, R.A. Navarro Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorS. Leath, S. Leath Dep. of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorD.T. Bowman, D.T. Bowman Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorP.R. Weisz, P.R. Weisz Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorL.G. Ambrose, L.G. Ambrose Beaufort Co. CES, 155 Airport Rd., Washington, NC, 27889Search for more papers by this authorM.H. Pate, M.H. Pate MidState Mills, Inc., P.O. Box 350, Newton, NC, 28658Search for more papers by this authorM.O. Fountain, M.O. Fountain Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this author J.P. Murphy, Corresponding Author J.P. Murphy njpm@unity.ncsu.edu Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author (njpm@unity.ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this authorR.A. Navarro, R.A. Navarro Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorS. Leath, S. Leath Dep. of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorD.T. Bowman, D.T. Bowman Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorP.R. Weisz, P.R. Weisz Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorL.G. Ambrose, L.G. Ambrose Beaufort Co. CES, 155 Airport Rd., Washington, NC, 27889Search for more papers by this authorM.H. Pate, M.H. Pate MidState Mills, Inc., P.O. Box 350, Newton, NC, 28658Search for more papers by this authorM.O. Fountain, M.O. Fountain Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 July 2004 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1479Citations: 17 Research supported in part by grants from the North Carolina Small Grains Growers Association, the North Carolina Foundation Seed Producers, Inc., and the North Carolina Crop Improvement Association. Registration by CSSA. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume44, Issue4July–August 2004Pages 1479-1480 RelatedInformation}, number={4}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Murphy, JP and Navarro, RA and Leath, S and Bowman, DT and Weisz, PR and Ambrose, LG and Pate, MH and Fountain, MO}, year={2004}, pages={1479–1480} }
 @article{bowman_bourland_myers_wallace_caldwell_2004, title={Visual selection for yield in cotton breeding programs}, volume={8}, ISBN={1524-3303}, number={2}, journal={Journal of Cotton Science (Online)}, author={Bowman, D. T. and Bourland, F. M. and Myers, G. O. and Wallace, T. P. and Caldwell, D.}, year={2004}, pages={62} }
 @article{koenning_edmisten_barker_bowman_morrison_2003, title={Effects of rate and time of application of poultry litter on Hoplolaimus columbus on cotton}, volume={87}, ISSN={["0191-2917"]}, DOI={10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.10.1244}, abstractNote={ Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of soil-incorporated poultry litter on the population dynamics of Hoplolaimus columbus and cotton lint yield. Rates of poultry litter applied varied from 0.0 to 27.0 t/ha and were applied in December, February, or March. Time of application did not influence population densities of this nematode or cotton yield. The rate of poultry litter applied was negatively related to the population density of H. columbus at midseason, but not at other sampling dates. The lower midseason levels of this nematode corresponded with increases in cotton lint yield in all experiments. Cotton yield increases generally were linear with respect to the rate of litter applied, although the highest rates of litter applied did not always result in the greatest cotton yield. Poultry litter can be used effectively to supply nutrients to the crop and suppress damaging levels of H. columbus. Optimal rates of litter application were from 6.0 to 13.4 t/ha. Application of poultry litter at these rates, however, may exceed nutrient levels required for best management practices. }, number={10}, journal={PLANT DISEASE}, author={Koenning, SR and Edmisten, KL and Barker, KR and Bowman, DT and Morrison, DE}, year={2003}, month={Oct}, pages={1244–1249} }
 @article{bowman_may_creech_2003, title={Genetic uniformity of the US upland cotton crop since the introduction of transgenic cottons}, volume={43}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2003.0515}, abstractNote={Field genetic uniformity is the probability that any two plants selected at random within a region carry alleles that are identical by descent. Genetic uniformity of field crops can occur through breeding with genetically related backgrounds and grower choice of a few related cultivars among other factors. Transgenic cotton cultivars currently dominate the U.S. cottonseed market, comprising approximately 72% of the Year 2000 cotton hectares. All transgenic cotton cultivars were derived through backcross breeding with popular nontransgenic cultivars. The objective of this study was to apply pedigree analysis to estimate field genetic uniformity since transgenic cultivars were introduced into the U.S. cottonseed market in 1996. Coefficients of parentage and proportion of hectares planted to transgenic cultivars were employed to estimate field genetic uniformity for the southeastern, south-central, southwestern, and western production regions. Compared with field genetic uniformity estimated in the Year 1995 preceding introduction of transgenic cultivars, field genetic uniformity did change (0.18 vs. 0.13). The number of cultivars planted on the largest hectarage has not changed, but the percentage of the crop planted to a few cultivars has declined. The proportion of the hectarage planted to the most popular cultivar also has declined. Both of these factors affected field genetic uniformity resulting in a 28% reduction in uniformity across the USA.}, number={2}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Bowman, DT and May, OL and Creech, JB}, year={2003}, pages={515–518} }
 @article{carter_burton_villagarcia_cui_zhou_fountain_bowman_niewoehner_2003, title={Registration of 'n7103' soybean}, volume={43}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2003.1128}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 43, Issue 3 p. 1128-1128 Registrations Of Cultivar Registration of ‘N7103’ Soybean T.E. Carter, Corresponding Author T.E. Carter tommy_carter@ncsu.edu USDA-ARS and Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Corresponding author (tommy_carter@ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this authorJ.W. Burton, J.W. Burton USDA-ARS and Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorM.R. Villagarcia, M.R. Villagarcia Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorZ. Cui, Z. Cui Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorX. Zhou, X. Zhou Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorM.O. Fountain, M.O. Fountain Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorD.T. Bowman, D.T. Bowman Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorA.S. Niewoehner, A.S. Niewoehner Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this author T.E. Carter, Corresponding Author T.E. Carter tommy_carter@ncsu.edu USDA-ARS and Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Corresponding author (tommy_carter@ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this authorJ.W. Burton, J.W. Burton USDA-ARS and Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorM.R. Villagarcia, M.R. Villagarcia Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorZ. Cui, Z. Cui Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorX. Zhou, X. Zhou Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorM.O. Fountain, M.O. Fountain Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorD.T. Bowman, D.T. Bowman Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this authorA.S. Niewoehner, A.S. Niewoehner Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7631Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 May 2003 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1128Citations: 10 Registration by CSSA. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume43, Issue3May–June 2003Pages 1128-1128 RelatedInformation}, number={3}, journal={Crop Science}, author={Carter, T. E. and Burton, J. W. and Villagarcia, M. R. and Cui, Z. and Zhou, X. and Fountain, M. O. and Bowman, D. T. and Niewoehner, A. S.}, year={2003}, pages={1128} }
 @article{bowman_gutierrez_2003, title={Sources of fiber strength in the U.S. upland cotton crop from 1980 to 2000}, volume={7}, number={4}, journal={Journal of Cotton Science}, author={Bowman, D. T. and Gutierrez, O. A.}, year={2003}, pages={164–169} }
 @article{murphy_navarro_leath_bowman_2002, title={Registration of 'NC Hulless' oat}, volume={42}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2002.0311}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 42, Issue 1 p. 311-311 Registration of Cultivars Registration of ‘NC Hulless’ Oat J.P. Murphy, Corresponding Author J.P. Murphy njpm@unity.ncsu.edu Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author (njpm@unity.ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this authorR.A. Navarro, R.A. Navarro Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorS. Leath, S. Leath USDA-ARS, Dep. of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorD.T. Bowman, D.T. Bowman Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this author J.P. Murphy, Corresponding Author J.P. Murphy njpm@unity.ncsu.edu Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author (njpm@unity.ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this authorR.A. Navarro, R.A. Navarro Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorS. Leath, S. Leath USDA-ARS, Dep. of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorD.T. Bowman, D.T. Bowman Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 January 2002 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.3110 Research supported in part by grants from the North Carolina Small Grains Growers Association, Inc. and the USDA-ARS. Registration by CSSA. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Volume42, Issue1January–February 2002Pages 311-311 RelatedInformation}, number={1}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Murphy, JP and Navarro, RA and Leath, S and Bowman, DT}, year={2002}, pages={311–311} }
 @article{bowman_2001, title={Registration of NC 72 cotton germplasm line}, volume={41}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2001.4141369x}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 41, Issue 4 p. 1369-1369 Registration of Germplasm Registration of NC 72 Cotton Germplasm Line Daryl T. Bowman, Corresponding Author Daryl T. Bowman daryl_bowman@ncsu.edu Crop Science Dep., Box 8604, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-8604Corresponding author (daryl_bowman@ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this author Daryl T. Bowman, Corresponding Author Daryl T. Bowman daryl_bowman@ncsu.edu Crop Science Dep., Box 8604, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-8604Corresponding author (daryl_bowman@ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 July 2001 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.4141369xCitations: 2 Research supported in part by Cotton Inc. Registration by CSSA. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume41, Issue4July 2001Pages 1369-1369 RelatedInformation}, number={4}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Bowman, DT}, year={2001}, pages={1369–1369} }
 @article{koenning_barker_bowman_2001, title={Resistance as a tactic for management of Meloidogyne incognita on cotton in North Carolina}, volume={33}, number={2-3}, journal={Journal of Nematology}, author={Koenning, S. R. and Barker, K. R. and Bowman, D. T.}, year={2001}, pages={126–131} }
 @article{bowman_2000, title={Attributes of public and private cotton breeding programs}, volume={4}, number={2}, journal={Journal of Cotton Science}, author={Bowman, D. T.}, year={2000}, pages={130–136} }
 @article{bowman_2000, title={TFPlan: Software for restricted randomization in field plot design}, volume={92}, ISSN={["0002-1962"]}, DOI={10.2134/agronj2000.9261276x}, abstractNote={Strict computer randomizations of entry/treatment numbers in field plot designs may result in the placement of entries on one side of the field or back‐to‐back. Both situations present a problem if the blocks have not been properly assigned, or errors occur in planting, maintaining, or harvesting the plots. A software program (TFPlan) was developed to avoid the randomizations that resulted in these two types of problems. TFPlan was initially designed for cultivar performance trials in North Carolina and may be useful to breeders, cultivar testing programs, and researchers who have large entry/treatment numbers. It has the capability of adding tests, changing plots, inserting border and irrigation rows, marking fill‐in plots, adding miscellaneous footnotes as well as labeling the tests. TFPlan will make 500 or more attempts to find a randomization that does not have entries occurring only on one side of the field or back‐to‐back.}, number={6}, journal={AGRONOMY JOURNAL}, author={Bowman, DT}, year={2000}, pages={1276–1278} }
 @article{johansson_whitaker_hagler_giesbrecht_young_bowman_2000, title={Testing shelled corn for aflatoxin, Part I: Estimation of variance components}, volume={83}, number={5}, journal={Journal of AOAC International}, author={Johansson, A. S. and Whitaker, T. B. and Hagler, W. M. and Giesbrecht, F. G. and Young, J. H. and Bowman, D. T.}, year={2000}, pages={1264–1269} }
 @article{koenning_barker_bowman_2000, title={Tolerance of selected cotton lines to Rotylenchulus reniformis}, volume={32}, number={4}, journal={Journal of Nematology}, author={Koenning, S. R. and Barker, K. R. and Bowman, D. T.}, year={2000}, pages={519–523} }
 @article{van esbroeck_bowman_may_calhoun_1999, title={Genetic similarity indices for ancestral cotton cultivars and their impact on genetic diversity estimates of modern cultivars}, volume={39}, number={2}, journal={Crop Science}, author={Van Esbroeck, G. A. and Bowman, D. T. and May, O. L. and Calhoun, D. S.}, year={1999}, pages={323–328} }
 @article{bowman_1999, title={Public cotton breeders: do we need them?}, volume={3}, number={3}, journal={Journal of Cotton Science}, author={Bowman, D. T.}, year={1999}, pages={139–152} }
 @article{van esbroeck_bowman_van't hof_jividen_1999, title={Variation among cotton cultivars for the number of fiber initials per seed}, number={1999}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Van Esbroeck, G. A. and Bowman, D. T. and Van't Hof, J. and Jividen, G. M.}, year={1999}, pages={487} }
 @article{van esbroeck_bowman_calhoun_may_1998, title={Changes in the genetic diversity of cotton in the USA from 1970 to 1995}, volume={38}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800010006x}, abstractNote={Despite concern about genetic vulnerability, little is known about the recent changes in the genetic diversity of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). The objectives of this study were to determine the trends in the genetic diversity of upland cotton in the USA during the last 25 yr and to investigate probable causes for these changes. Two estimates of genetic diversity, coefficient of parentage (rp) and field uniformity (ri; rp weighted by the proportion of the hectarage occupied), were made for cultivars occupying over 1% of the hectarage within a region (Southeast, South‐central, Southwest, and West) from 1970 to 1995 at 5‐yr intervals. An average of 17 (range = 8–46) cultivars accounted for 97% of the cotton hectarage within a region. Regional rp values were relatively stable at 0.12 to 0.15 from 1970 to 1990 and then sharply increased to 0.20 in 1995. Higher rp values in commonly grown cultivars than in released cultivars indicated that much of the genetic diversity in cotton remains unused by growers. Field uniformity (ri) remained at about 0.30 for all regions during the past 25 yr because increases in rp were matched with an increase in the number of cultivars grown and/or a decline in the proportion of the area planted to any single cultivar. The frequent use of several parents for the creation of new cultivars and the planting of only a small portion of the available cultivars has led to a high level of genetic uniformity.}, number={1}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Van Esbroeck, GA and Bowman, DT and Calhoun, DS and May, OL}, year={1998}, pages={33–37} }
 @article{van esbroeck_bowman_1998, title={Cotton germplasm diversity and its importance to cultivar development}, volume={2}, number={3}, journal={Journal of Cotton Science}, author={Van Esbroeck, G. and Bowman, D. T.}, year={1998}, pages={121–129} }
 @article{van esbroeck_bowman_1998, title={Hybrid rank and variance of corn at sites with contrasting humic matter content}, volume={38}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020011x}, abstractNote={Widely adapted, high-yielding genotypes are most easily detected at sites in which differences among hybrids are large and where rankings are similar to the target environment. The objectives of this study were to determine if the relative yields, hybrid variances, and correlations with state-wide means for corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids differed among sites with low and high humic matter (HM) content. Five years of corn yield data from sites with contrasting HM content (0.032 vs. 0.059 g cm -3 ) located near Plymouth, NC, were collected. An analysis was performed for each year and maturity group which contained 12 to 48 hybrids. Mean yields averaged 12% (0.91 Mg ha -1 ) less at the high than low HM sites. Hybrid x HM interactions were significant (P < 0.05) in about half of all trials but rarely involved changes in the rank order among hybrids, indicating that duplicating trials on the two soil types was not warranted. Despite lower yields at the high HM sites, ranges and hybrid variances were larger in these sites. Maximum yields were less affected by soil type than minimum yields, indicating greater stress tolerance in high-yielding hybrids. A differential response among hybrids to some additional stress appeared to account for greater hybrid variances observed at the high HM sites. Correlations with state-wide mean performance were greater for high than low HM sites. Locating test sites on soils with high HM content may be an efficient way to detect hybrids capable of producing high yields under a range of soil and climatic conditions.}, number={2}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Van Esbroeck, GA and Bowman, DT}, year={1998}, pages={347–352} }
 @article{bowman_1998, title={North Carolina measured crop performance: small grains 1998}, number={173}, journal={Crop Science Research Report (North Carolina State University. Dept. of Crop Science)}, author={Bowman, D. T.}, year={1998} }
 @article{bowman_1998, title={Using crop performance data to select hybrids and varieties}, volume={11}, ISSN={["0890-8524"]}, DOI={10.2134/jpa1998.0256}, abstractNote={The proliferation of hybrids and varieties available to growers and the availability of data in various formats make varietal selection difficult This report seeks to guide growers, consultants, and extension agents on how to use the most appropriate data sets from university trials in varietal selection. Six crops (barley [Hordeum vulgare L.], corn [Zea mays L], cotton [Gossypium hirsutum L.], oats [Avena sativa L.], soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and wheat [Triticum aestivum L.]) in the North Carolina Official Variety Trials were examined for turnover rate, variety x environmental interactions, and probabilities of predicting the top varieties in a subsequent year based on single and 2-yr data. Single-year turnover rates ranged from 27 to 51%. There were no variety x location interactions but there were variety x year interactions in barley and early and medium maturing cotton, and variety x location x year interactions in barley, MGVI soybean, and wheat. Based on all data examined in this study, single-year multi-location data would be appropriate to use in selecting midseason corn hybrids. Two-year multi-location data would be useful for barley, early and full-season corn, early and medium cotton, oats, MG V and VI soybean, and wheat. The protocol used in this study could be applied to other crops in other states recognizing that not all crops are tested equally and best data sets may be different for the various crops.}, number={2}, journal={JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE}, author={Bowman, DT}, year={1998}, pages={256–259} }
 @article{whitaker_trucksess_johansson_giesbrecht_hagler_bowman_1998, title={Variability associated with testing shelled corn for fumonisin}, volume={81}, number={6}, journal={Journal of AOAC International}, author={Whitaker, T. B. and Trucksess, M. W. and Johansson, A. S. and Giesbrecht, F. G. and Hagler, W. M. and Bowman, D. T.}, year={1998}, pages={1162–1168} }
 @article{bowman_may_calhoun_1997, title={Coefficients of parentage for 260 cotton cultivars released between 1970 and 1990}, number={1852}, journal={Technical Bulletin (United States. Dept. of Agriculture)}, author={Bowman, D. T. and May, O. L. and Calhoun, D. S.}, year={1997}, pages={80} }
 @article{bowman_1997, title={Cotton variety testing recommendations}, volume={1}, number={1997}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Bowman, D. T.}, year={1997}, pages={490–491} }
 @article{bowman_watson_1997, title={Measures of validity in cultivar performance trials}, volume={89}, ISSN={["0002-1962"]}, DOI={10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900060003x}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={6}, journal={AGRONOMY JOURNAL}, author={Bowman, DT and Watson, CE}, year={1997}, pages={860–866} }
 @article{bowman_1997, title={North Carolina measured crop performance: small grains 1997}, number={167}, journal={Crop Science Research Report (North Carolina State University. Dept. of Crop Science)}, author={Bowman, D. T.}, year={1997} }
 @book{van esbroeck_bowman_may_1997, title={Pedigrees and distinguishing characteristics of upland and pima cotton germplasm lines released between 1972 and 1996}, publisher={Raleigh, N.C.: N.C. Agricultural Research Service, North Carolina State University}, author={Van Esbroeck, G. A. and Bowman, D. T. and May, O. L.}, year={1997} }
 @article{murphy_navarro_leath_murphy_bowman_1997, title={Registration of 'Rodgers' oat}, volume={37}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700030073x}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 37, Issue 3 cropsci1997.0011183X003700030073x p. 1017-1017 Registration of Cultivars Registration of ‘Rodgers’ Oat J. P. Murphy, Corresponding Author J. P. Murphy [email protected] Dep. of Crop ScienceCorresponding author ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorR. A. Navarro, R. A. Navarro Dep. of Crop ScienceSearch for more papers by this authorS. Leath, S. Leath USDA-ARS and Dep. of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorC. F. Murphy, C. F. Murphy USDA-ARS, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD, 20705Search for more papers by this authorD. T. Bowman, D. T. Bowman Dep. of Crop ScienceSearch for more papers by this author J. P. Murphy, Corresponding Author J. P. Murphy [email protected] Dep. of Crop ScienceCorresponding author ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorR. A. Navarro, R. A. Navarro Dep. of Crop ScienceSearch for more papers by this authorS. Leath, S. Leath USDA-ARS and Dep. of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorC. F. Murphy, C. F. Murphy USDA-ARS, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD, 20705Search for more papers by this authorD. T. Bowman, D. T. Bowman Dep. of Crop ScienceSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 May 1997 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700030073xCitations: 1AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume37, Issue3May–June 1997Pages 1017-1017 RelatedInformation}, number={3}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Murphy, JP and Navarro, RA and Leath, S and Murphy, CF and Bowman, DT}, year={1997}, pages={1017–1017} }
 @article{bowman_mccarty_1997, title={Thrips (Thysanoptera : Thripidae) tolerance in cotton: Sources and heritability}, volume={32}, ISSN={["0749-8004"]}, DOI={10.18474/0749-8004-32.4.460}, abstractNote={Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) resistance or tolerance in cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., is often associated with extreme pubescence. This is undesirable because hairy (pubescent) plants tend to have more trash in harvested lint which reduces the price received by growers. Two other possible sources of resistance include gossypol and thick lower epidermal cells, the latter has been found in G. barbadense L. Five G. barbadense genotypes were mated in a North Carolina Design II to 4 upland cultivars to evaluate combining ability. In addition, 90 converted racestocks were screened for tolerance to thrips. Experiments were designed to evaluate tolerance or resistance by comparing plots with and without thrips. Two G. barbadense parents had tolerance to thrips while two upland cultivars also exhibited tolerance. In the F1 generation, general combining ability was significant for thrips damage ratings among the G. barbadense parents. In the F2 generation, all characters exhibited specific combining ability. Thus, non-additive genetic variance predominates measures of thrips tolerance.}, number={4}, journal={JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE}, author={Bowman, DT and McCarty, JC}, year={1997}, month={Oct}, pages={460–471} }
 @article{bowman_rawlings_1995, title={ESTABLISHING A REJECTION PROCEDURE FOR CROP PERFORMANCE DATA}, volume={87}, ISSN={["0002-1962"]}, DOI={10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700020002x}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={2}, journal={AGRONOMY JOURNAL}, author={BOWMAN, DT and RAWLINGS, JO}, year={1995}, pages={147–151} }
 @article{bowman_1995, title={REGISTRATION OF 3 GLABROUS COTTON GERMPLASM LINES WITH HIGH LINT PERCENTAGE - NC-88-90, NC-88-91, AND NC-88-95}, volume={35}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500020069x}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 35, Issue 2 cropsci1995.0011183X003500020069x p. 600-600 Registration of Germplasm Registration of Three Glabrous Cotton Germplasm Lines with High Lint Percentage: NC 88-90, NC 88-91, and NC 88-95 Daryl T. Bowman, Daryl T. BowmanSearch for more papers by this author Daryl T. Bowman, Daryl T. BowmanSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 March 1995 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500020069xAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume35, Issue2March–April 1995Pages 600-600 RelatedInformation}, number={2}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={BOWMAN, DT}, year={1995}, pages={600–600} }
 @article{bowman_schmitt_1994, title={SCREENING COTTON FOR TOLERANCE TO HOPLOLAIMUS-COLUMBUS}, volume={78}, ISSN={["0191-2917"]}, DOI={10.1094/PD-78-0695}, abstractNote={In order to adequately plan experiments to measure tolerance of cotton to Hoplolaimus columbus, coefficients of variation (CVs) and error variances of yield were examined to determine the minimum number of replicates and environments needed to measure specified differences for tolerance index (TI) and field tolerance. In two greenhouse trials with 84 genotypes, the error variance was 1,423 and would have required 231 replicates to ensure detecting a 10% genotypic difference in TI. In the 3-yr, one-location field study reported, CVs ranged from 10.0 to 25.4%, while error variances for TI ranged from 68 to 512. The pooled error variance (243) was used in calculating the minimum number of replicates and environments [...]}, number={7}, journal={PLANT DISEASE}, author={BOWMAN, DT and SCHMITT, DP}, year={1994}, month={Jul}, pages={695–697} }
 @article{bowman_raymer_dombek_1993, title={CROP PERFORMANCE TRIALS UNDER IRRIGATED AND DRYLAND CONDITIONS}, volume={85}, ISSN={["0002-1962"]}, DOI={10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030017x}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={3}, journal={AGRONOMY JOURNAL}, author={BOWMAN, D and RAYMER, P and DOMBEK, D}, year={1993}, pages={610–614} }
 @article{bowman_1991, title={PLOT CONFIGURATION IN LATE-PLANTED DETERMINANT SOYBEAN YIELD TRIALS IN NORTH-CAROLINA}, volume={4}, ISSN={["0890-8524"]}, DOI={10.2134/jpa1991.0256}, abstractNote={Competition has been shown to be significant in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] yield trials in the past, and consequently the use of bordered plots is a standard practice in the Southern USA. The earlier studies, however, did not involve late-planted determinant soybeans which constitute a major portion of the soybeans planted in this region. A field study was conducted to determine if competition were great enough in late-planted determinant soybean yield trials planted at conventional row widths (i.e., 30–38 in.) to require bordered plots. The study involved four environments, three maturity groups, and from nine to 26 entries within each group. Each plot consisted of four rows with the center two rows considered a bordered plot and the two outside rows considered an unbordered, two-row plot. The average error variance of the unbordered plots was 1.26 times as great as the error variance of the bordered plots, but the entry by border interaction was significant in only two of the 12 data sets. Correlations between border treatments for entry mean yield and entry rank were all highly significant. The relative efficiency of two-row unbordered plots with six replicates averaged 2.02, while harvesting all four rows vs. only the center two rows resulted in an average relative efficiency of 1.40. The need for border rows on each side of a two-row plot in late-planted determinant soybeans at conventional row widths does not seem justified.}, number={2}, journal={JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE}, author={BOWMAN, DT}, year={1991}, pages={256–259} }
 @article{bowman_hagler_1991, title={POTENTIAL USE OF VISUAL MOLD RATINGS TO PREDICT MYCOTOXIN CONTAMINATION OF GRAIN-SORGHUM}, volume={4}, ISSN={["0890-8524"]}, DOI={10.2134/jpa1991.0132}, abstractNote={(...) Several sorghum hybrids were examined for bird damage and visible grain mold prior to harvest at seven locations in 1986 and 1987. Zearalenone and deoxynivalenol levels were analyzed in the harvested samples. Bird damage, Fusarium grain mold, zearalenone, and deoxynivalenol were detected in 68, 87, 67, and 88% of all samples, respectively (...)}, number={1}, journal={JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE}, author={BOWMAN, DT and HAGLER, WM}, year={1991}, pages={132–134} }
 @article{bowman_weeks_wilkinson_1991, title={STABILITY OF ALKALOID PRODUCTION IN FLUE-CURED TOBACCO}, volume={31}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183x003100050006x}, abstractNote={Alkaloid production in flue‐cared tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) genotypes must be within an established acceptable level for the genotypes to be released as cultivars. The objectives of this study were to examine the stability of alkaloid production in cultivars and advanced breeding lines relative to standards set in the Regional Minimum Standards Program. Stability of alkaloid production was examined using data from the Regional Farm Test entries (1986– 1988) and the North Carolina Official Variety Tests (1979–1983). Averaged across 55 environments, the two check cultivars did not differ in nicotine or nornicotine production; however, ‘NC 95’ produced higher levels of anabasine and anatabine and had a higher ratio of total secondary alkaloids to total alkaloids (TSA/TA) than ‘NC 2326’. As indicated by the coefficients of variation, there were stability differences for nornicotine, anabasine, and anatabine production as well as TSA/TA in the Regional Farm Tests but none for nicotine production. In the North Carolina Official Variety Tests, there was a significant cultivar ✕ year interaction for nicotine production and a significant location effect for nornicotine production. The unstable production of secondary alkaloids suggests that TSA/TA should be examined across both years in which the entries are in the program before rejection or acceptance.}, number={5}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={BOWMAN, DT and WEEKS, WW and WILKINSON, CA}, year={1991}, pages={1121–1124} }
 @article{bowman_tart_stocks_1990, title={Estimating leaf ripening rates of flue-cured tobacco cultivars}, volume={192}, number={19}, journal={Tobacco International}, author={Bowman, D. T. and Tart, A. G. and Stocks, G. R.}, year={1990}, pages={30} }
 @article{bowman_1990, title={TREND ANALYSIS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF AGRONOMIC TRIALS IN FLUE-CURED TOBACCO}, volume={82}, ISSN={["0002-1962"]}, DOI={10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200030011x}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={3}, journal={AGRONOMY JOURNAL}, author={BOWMAN, DT}, year={1990}, pages={499–501} }
 @article{bowman_1989, title={PLOT CONFIGURATION IN CORN YIELD TRIALS}, volume={29}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900050023x}, abstractNote={It is generally assumed that bordered plots are efficient for reducing error variance and the associated bias from border effects. Conflicting results in the literature regarding use of borders in corn (Zea mays L.) grain trials and limited information on use of borders in corn silage (herbage) trials prompted studies on the most efficient plot size and the need for bordered plots in corn grain and silage yield trials. The studies encompassed five and six environments over a span of 4 yr for silage and grain, respectively. Silage trials included from 24 to 28 hybrids each year. Grain trials included three different maturity groups with 18 to 64 entries. Four‐row plots were used with the center two rows representing bordered two‐row plots and the outside two rows considered as unbordered two‐row plots. Bordered two‐row plots were 1.06 and 1.02 as efficient in reducing error variance as unbordered two‐row plots for silage and grain, respectively. The hybrid by border interactions generally were not significant, and highly significant yield and rank correlations suggest that very little border bias was occurring. Four‐row unbordered plots were only 1.30 and 1.48 as efficient as the two‐row bordered plots for silage and grain trials, respectively. The greatest gain in efficiency, while not compromising estimation of relative hybrid yields (1.89 and 2.26) came from using two‐row unbordered plots and doubling the number of replicates for silage and grain yield trials, respectively, vs. the two‐row bordered plots.}, number={5}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={BOWMAN, DT}, year={1989}, pages={1202–1206} }
 @article{bowman_wernsman_1989, title={Stability of maternal doubled haploid lines of flue-cured tobacco}, volume={191}, number={14}, journal={Tobacco International}, author={Bowman, D. T. and Wernsman, E. A.}, year={1989}, pages={35} }