@article{juarez_2016, title={Commentary 2: Does a focus on commonalities obscure critical differences?}, volume={17}, number={2}, journal={Intersecciones en Antropologia}, author={Juarez, C.}, year={2016}, pages={149–150} }
 @article{ross_juarez_urbanova_2016, title={Complexity of assessing migrant death place of origin}, journal={Biological Distance Analysis: Forensic and Bioarchaeological Perspectives}, author={Ross, A. H. and Juarez, C. A. and Urbanova, P.}, year={2016}, pages={265–283} }
 @misc{ross_juarez_2016, title={Skeletal and radiological manifestations of child abuse: Implications for study in past populations}, volume={29}, ISSN={["1098-2353"]}, DOI={10.1002/ca.22683}, abstractNote={Child abuse in its various types such as physical, emotional, sexual, and neglect has been document throughout history. However, before the mid‐20th century, inflicted injuries to children was overlooked in part because children were often viewed as property. According to the World Health Organization, 57,000 children were the victims of homicide in the year 2000. In this paper we present the skeletal and radiological manifestation of physical abuse and fatal neglect and provide recommendations to assess child maltreatment from past populations. Pediatric biomechanical factors and healing are discussed as it is important to keep in mind that children are not just small adults. Skeletal and radiological indicators of nonaccidental or inflicted injuries are reviewed from the literature. Inflicted injuries are presented based on specificity to identify child abuse. In addition, skeletal indicators that could help assess fatal starvation are also reviewed and metabolic diseases are proposed as potential evidence of neglect. A recent child homicide is presented and used to illustrate the difficulty in assessing child maltreatment. Present‐day clinical child abuse protocols are used to provide recommendations to assess child abuse in a bioarchaeological context. Clin. Anat. 29:844–853, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.}, number={7}, journal={CLINICAL ANATOMY}, author={Ross, Ann H. and Juarez, Chelsey A.}, year={2016}, month={Oct}, pages={844–853} }
 @article{ross_juarez_2014, title={A brief history of fatal child maltreatment and neglect}, volume={10}, ISSN={1547-769X 1556-2891}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S12024-014-9531-1}, DOI={10.1007/S12024-014-9531-1}, number={3}, journal={Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Ross, Ann H. and Juarez, Chelsey A.}, year={2014}, month={Jan}, pages={413–422} }
 @article{juarez_2014, title={Human Identity and Identification.}, volume={26}, ISSN={["1520-6300"]}, DOI={10.1002/ajhb.22541}, abstractNote={American Journal of Human BiologyVolume 26, Issue 3 p. 433-434 Book Review Human Identity and Identification. By Gowland Rebecca and Thompson Tim. 225 pp. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2013. $120.00 (cloth), $45.00 (paper), $36.00 (ebook). Chelsey Juarez, Chelsey Juarez Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North CarolinaSearch for more papers by this author Chelsey Juarez, Chelsey Juarez Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North CarolinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 20 March 2014 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22541Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. LITERATURE CITED Budgeon S. 2003. Identity as an embodied event. Body Soc 9: 35–55. 10.1177/1357034X030091003 Google Scholar Volume26, Issue3May/June 2014Pages 433-434 ReferencesRelatedInformation}, number={3}, journal={AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY}, author={Juarez, Chelsey}, year={2014}, month={May}, pages={433–434} }
 @article{hughes_juarez_zephro_fowler_chacon_2012, title={Past or present? Differentiating California prehistoric native American remains from forensic cases: An empirical approach}, volume={22}, ISSN={1047-482X}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oa.1192}, DOI={10.1002/oa.1192}, abstractNote={The goal of this project is to provide additional data and statistical analyses for differentiating between prehistoric/historic Native American remains and modern forensic cases that may be potentially confusing. Forensic anthropologists often receive requests from local law enforcement to infer whether skeletal remains are of forensic or non-forensic significance. Skeletal remains of non-forensic significance are commonly of Native American ancestry, but the empirical methods common for determining Native American affinity from skeletal remains have not been established for California prehistoric/historic Native Americans. Therefore, forensic anthropologists working in California lack empirical methods for not only identifying prehistoric California Native American remains, but also differentiating them from modern/forensic populations whose skeletal attributes are similar. In particular, skeletal remains of Latin American US immigrants of indigenous origins are becoming more present in the forensic anthropological laboratory, and can exhibit the same suite of skeletal traits classically used to identify Native American affinity. In this article, we initiate an investigation into this issue by analyzing both craniometric and morphoscopic data using a range of statistical methods for differentiating prehistoric Northern California Native Americans from modern Guatemalan Maya. Our discriminant analyses results indicate that by using nine craniometric variables, group classification is 87% correct. In addition, seven morphoscopic variables can predict group classification correctly for 77% of the sample. The results suggest that it is possible to differentiate between our two samples. Such a method contributes to the efficient and empirical determination of temporal and geographic affinity, allowing for the repartriation of Native American remains to their tribes, as well as the accurate analysis of forensically significant remains.}, number={1}, journal={International Journal of Osteoarchaeology}, publisher={Wiley}, author={Hughes, Cris and Juarez, Chelsey and Zephro, Lauren and Fowler, Gillian and Chacon, Shirley}, year={2012}, month={Jan}, pages={110–118} }
 @article{aggarwal_habicht-mauche_juarez_2008, title={Application of heavy stable isotopes in forensic isotope geochemistry: A review}, volume={23}, ISSN={0883-2927}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.05.016}, DOI={10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.05.016}, abstractNote={Light stable isotopes have been used for many years to characterize the source and transport of materials. More recently heavy isotope systems such as Sr, Nd and Pb have been added to this list in order to aid source identification. With the advent of multiple collector ICP-MS, the range of isotopic tools now available has increased considerably, however, until the isotope systematics of these new non-traditional isotope systems have become better understood, they will not be as useful in characterizing material source and transportation. Applications using heavy metal stable isotopes (mostly traditional heavy isotopes) have reached most avenues in science, including earth sciences, archaeology, anthropology, animal physiology, ecology and toxicology. This field will continue to grow as new applications are developed and techniques become simpler and quicker. This paper provides a review of how this field has grown and presents two new applications using Pb and Sr isotopes in glazes to determine the source of ore used in glazes, and using Sr isotopes to determine the origin of undocumented deceased Mexican border crossers.}, number={9}, journal={Applied Geochemistry}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Aggarwal, Jugdeep and Habicht-Mauche, Judith and Juarez, Chelsey}, year={2008}, month={Sep}, pages={2658–2666} }