@article{watkins_poole_youssef_moursi_vann_heiniger_2024, title={E FFECTS OF SHALLOW SURFACE DRAINAGE DITCHES W ITH CONTROLLED SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE M ANAGEMENT ON CROP YIELDS IN NORTH CAROLINA}, volume={67}, ISSN={["2769-3287"]}, DOI={10.13031/ja.15537}, abstractNote={Highlights Shallow surface ditches with controlled subsurface drainage (SD) increased corn and soybean yields in eight of nine growing seasons compared to conventional drainage. The SD system increased corn yields on average by 0.4 Mg/ha, or 4% (0.7 Mg/ha, or 6.6%, excluding 2016). The SD system increased soybean yields on average by 0.5 Mg/ha, or 14.3%. Abstract. Agricultural drainage in the coastal areas of North Carolina (NC) is commonly achieved through large trapezoidal-shaped ditches. The coastal region of NC has limited topographic relief (slopes < 1%) with poorly drained soils that can cause substantial issues with surface water ponding during high-intensity or long-duration precipitation events without some form of surface drainage. Installation of large free flowing surface ditches (FD) with field crowning improves the drainage intensity but can create negative consequences such as over drainage and side slope scouring within the ditch. Large open ditches remove tillable land from production and serve as a primary transport pathway for pollutants. An alternative drainage design (SD) has been implemented that decreases the size of the surface ditches, limiting their drainage effect to only surface water and potentially improving equipment trafficability. The smaller ditches, installed with precision grade equipment, are placed on a grade sufficient to direct surface flow while keeping soil movement to a minimum. Lateral subsurface drainage tiles are installed to provide subsurface drainage and are connected to a main tile line operated with an outlet control structure for controlled drainage (CD). This study evaluates the crop yield and water table effects of the SD system compared to FD over nine crop seasons from 2014-2022. The SD treatment increased yield in eight of the nine crop seasons overall, four of five corn (Zea mays L.) crops, and all four soybean (Glycine max L.) crops. Overall, SD increased corn yields by 0.4 Mg/ha or 4% (0.7 Mg/ha or 6.6% with the exclusion of 2016) and soybean yields by 0.5 Mg/ha (14.3%). The effects of SD on crop yield and water table show that the system can be utilized to improve crop health and provide better management of cropland for producers. Keywords: Corn Yield, Drainage Water Management, Soybean Yield, Surface Drainage, Water Table.}, number={2}, journal={JOURNAL OF THE ASABE}, author={Watkins, Mitchell L. and Poole, Chad and Youssef, Mohamed A. and Moursi, Hossam and Vann, Rachel and Heiniger, Ron}, year={2024}, pages={349–361} }
 @article{moursi_youssef_poole_2024, title={THE EFFECT OF DRAINAGE AND SUBIRRIGATION FROM A SMALL DRAINAGE WATER RECYCLING RESERVOIR ON CORN AND SOYBEAN YIELDS IN EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA}, volume={67}, ISSN={["2769-3287"]}, DOI={10.13031/ja.15536}, abstractNote={Highlights The Drainage Water Recycling (DWR) reservoir stored enough water to meet irrigation demand in three of four growing seasons. Subirrigation raised the groundwater table by an average of 15 cm. On average, DWR increased corn and soybean yields by 0.52 Mg ha -1 (8%) and 0.45 Mg ha -1 (17%), respectively. Subirrigation from the small size DWR reservoir did not protect corn from extended dry conditions during the growing season. Nutrients recycled back to the field via supplemental irrigation were not large enough to reduce fertilizer application rate. Abstract. Drainage water recycling (DWR) has been proposed as a source of supplemental irrigation to increase crop production resilience to extended and more frequent dry periods during the crop growing season; however, the system’s potential benefits have not been adequately quantified. The main objective of this study was to assess the performance of a DWR system for providing water for supplemental irrigation to corn and soybean at a research site in eastern North Carolina and quantify corn and soybean yield responses during 4 growing seasons (2018-2021) with varying weather conditions. Two treatments were implemented at the study site: DWR and the control (CT) treatment. The CT treatment was a 11.23 ha non-irrigated field that was primarily drained by a surface drainage system. The DWR treatment (11.48 ha) had a subsurface drainage system that provided drainage during the wet periods and subirrigation during the dry periods of the growing season. A small size reservoir (5,458 m3) was used to collect surface runoff and subsurface drainage and subirrigate the DWR treatment. Results showed that the DWR reservoir stored enough water to meet irrigation requirements in 3 of the four growing seasons and provided 5 to 73 mm of irrigation to the DWR treatment. Subirrigation raised the groundwater table by an average of 15 cm, which helped increase the upward movement of soil water to the root zone and meet crop evapotranspiration demand. DWR increased corn yields by 0.13 and 0.91 Mg ha-1 (1% and 79%) and soybean yields by 0.31 and 0.59 Mg ha-1 (9% and 30%). Subirrigation, which is generally less efficient than overhead irrigation methods, did not optimize the use of the limited water stored in the small reservoir and could not provide enough protection to corn against prolonged dry conditions in the 2019 growing season. The amount of nutrients recycled back to the field through subirrigation was not large enough to help reduce fertilizer application rate. Overall, the results demonstrated that DWR is a promising practice for increasing the resilience of crop production in the southeastern U.S. to the uncertainty in precipitation, which is expected to intensify by climate change. Monitoring the performance of DWR for longer periods with varying factors of weather, soil, and system design and management would help guide the design and management of the system to optimize the performance and minimize the implementation cost. Keywords: Drainage water management, Drainage water reuse, Irrigation reservoir, On-farm water storage, Subsurface drainage, Supplemental irrigation.}, number={1}, journal={JOURNAL OF THE ASABE}, author={Moursi, Hossam and Youssef, Mohamed A. and Poole, Chad}, year={2024}, pages={13–25} }
 @article{moursi_youssef_poole_castro-bolinaga_chescheir_richardson_2023, title={Drainage water recycling reduced nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment losses from a drained agricultural field in eastern North Carolina, USA}, volume={279}, ISSN={["1873-2283"]}, DOI={10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108179}, abstractNote={An experimental study was conducted to evaluate the effect of drainage water recycling (DWR) on reducing nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and sediment losses from agricultural fields to downstream surface water bodies. The two-year study (May 2019-April 2021) was conducted at an agricultural field in eastern North Carolina, U.S.A. A reservoir existed at the site was used to store subsurface drainage and surface runoff water during wet periods and provide supplemental irrigation during dry periods of the crop growing season. On average, the reservoir retained 14% of received inflow, with a higher flow reduction in the dry year (2019–2020; 29%) than the wet year (2020–2021; 8%). The hydraulic retention time (HRT) for the reservoir was 33.8 days for the dry year and 12.4 days for the wet year. The reservoir significantly reduced the loadings of N by 47%, P by 30% and sediment by 87%. Nitrogen load reduction was primarily driven by nitrate assimilation, the dominant form of N in the reservoir. Phosphorus load reduction was attributed to Orthophosphate assimilation as the reservoir released more particulate P than received. Reductions in both water flow and species concentration contributed to nutrient load reductions. Results suggested the removal efficiency of the reservoir would be highest during the summer and early fall months when the reservoir has a smaller water volume (due to irrigation), longer HRT, and warmer temperature. This study clearly demonstrated the potential of DWR for significantly reducing N, P, and sediment losses from agricultural land to receiving surface water. Further research is needed to investigate the physical, chemical, and biological processes that occur in the storage reservoir and affect the fate and transport of nutrients and sediment. The understanding of these processes will enable optimizing the treatment efficiency of DWR, which maximizes the system’s benefits and reduces construction cost.}, journal={AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT}, author={Moursi, Hossam and Youssef, Mohamed A. and Poole, Chad A. and Castro-Bolinaga, Celso F. and Chescheir, George M. and Richardson, Robert J.}, year={2023}, month={Apr} }
 @article{liu_youssef_chescheir_appelboom_poole_arellano_skaggs_2019, title={Effect of controlled drainage on nitrogen fate and transport for a subsurface drained grass field receiving liquid swine lagoon effluent}, volume={217}, ISSN={["1873-2283"]}, DOI={10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.018}, abstractNote={Application of livestock manure has become a principal nutrient source in groundwater and surface water. The goal of this research was to investigate the effect of controlled drainage (CD) on nitrogen (N) fate and transport for a subsurface drained grass field receiving liquid swine lagoon effluent (SLE). A four-year field experiment was conducted on a naturally poorly drained pasture in eastern North Carolina. The 1.25 ha experimental field was artificially drained by subsurface drains installed at 1.0 m depth and 12.5 m spacing. Two treatments, replicated twice were implemented: conventional drainage (FD) and CD. The CD management protocol was more intensive compared to previous studies. The drain outlets of CD plot were set at 36 cm below soil surface all year round except several days before irrigation application when water table depth was shallower than 65 cm below surface. Controlled drainage significantly reduced drainage flow and TN loading via subsurface drain lines by an average of 397 mm yr−1 (93%) and 34.5 kg N ha−1 yr−1 (94%), respectively. DRAINMOD hydrologic simulations indicated that 96% of the reduction in predicted drain flow was attributed to increased lateral seepage. The nitrogen that did not drain from the field in response to CD was lost via enhanced denitrification (67%) and lateral seepage to adjacent fields (33%). This study clearly demonstrated how CD management affects the N fate and transport through seepage and denitrification process.}, journal={AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT}, author={Liu, Yu and Youssef, Mohamed A. and Chescheir, George M. and Appelboom, Timothy W. and Poole, Chad A. and Arellano, Consuelo and Skaggs, R. Wayne}, year={2019}, month={May}, pages={440–451} }
 @article{poole_skaggs_youssef_chescheir_crozier_2018, title={EFFECT OF DRAINAGE WATER MANAGEMENT ON NITRATE NITROGEN LOSS TO TILE DRAINS IN NORTH CAROLINA}, volume={61}, ISSN={["2151-0040"]}, DOI={10.13031/trans.12296}, abstractNote={Abstract.}, number={1}, journal={TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE}, author={Poole, C. A. and Skaggs, R. W. and Youssef, M. A. and Chescheir, G. M. and Crozier, C. R.}, year={2018}, pages={233–244} }
 @article{poole_skaggs_cheschier_youssef_crozier_2013, title={Effects of drainage water management on crop yields in North Carolina}, volume={68}, ISSN={["1941-3300"]}, DOI={10.2489/jswc.68.6.429}, abstractNote={Research studies on a wide range of soils, crops, locations, and climates have shown that drainage water management (DWM), or controlled drainage (CD), can be used to substantially reduce the loss of nitrogen (N), and in some cases, phosphorus (P) from drained agricultural lands to surface waters. The adoption and widespread application of DWM depends on a variety of factors including its impact on crop yields. This paper presents results from a long term field study on the effect of DWM or CD on crop yields in a three-crop, two-year corn/wheat–soybean rotation. Yields were measured on replicated field scale plots under CD and conventional or free drainage (FD) treatments for a total of 18 crops on two experimental sites during the period from 1990 to 2011. Data were collected on 7 corn (Zea mays L.) crops, 5 wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crops, and 6 soybean (Glycine max L.) crops. Controlled drainage had no significant effect on yields of winter wheat, which in North Carolina is grown in the wettest, coolest part of the year. Controlled drainage increased corn yields compared to FD in all seven years. The average yield increase for corn was 11%. Controlled drainage also increased soybean yield in all years with an average increase of 10% compared to FD. Such yield responses will promote the application of DWM, which will result in both economic and environmental benefits.}, number={6}, journal={JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION}, author={Poole, C. A. and Skaggs, R. W. and Cheschier, G. M. and Youssef, M. A. and Crozier, C. R.}, year={2013}, pages={429–437} }