@book{berube_2023, title={Pandemics and Resilience: Lessons we should have learned from Zika}, ISBN={9783031253690 9783031253706}, ISSN={2626-6717 2626-6725}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25370-6}, DOI={10.1007/978-3-031-25370-6}, abstractNote={This book offers detailed information about the Zika pandemic and represents a tour de force in scholarship involving nearly 4,000 sources of information}, journal={Risk, Systems and Decisions}, publisher={Springer International Publishing}, author={Berube, David M.}, year={2023} }
 @book{pandemic communication and resilience_2021, url={https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-77344-1}, DOI={10.1007/978-3-030-77344-1}, abstractNote={This book concentrates on pandemic related communication and how pandemics become a more relevant feature of human co-existence with the planet.}, journal={Springer International Publishing}, year={2021}, month={Aug} }
 @article{berube_2020, title={Mosquitoes Bite: A Zika Story of Vector Management and Gene Drives}, ISBN={["978-3-030-27263-0"]}, DOI={10.1007/978-3-030-27264-7_7}, abstractNote={The Zika virus led to some experments and speculation regarding creative efforts to crash the population of mosquitoes responsible for spreading the disease. This chapter suggests that developments occurring in mosquito vector control using synthetic biology will introduce new genetic bugaboos into the debate over releasing genetically altered species, both accidentally and purposefully.}, journal={SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY 2020: FRONTIERS IN RISK ANALYSIS AND GOVERNANCE}, author={Berube, David M.}, year={2020}, pages={143–163} }
 @article{berube_bogomoletc_eng_jones_jokerst_2020, title={Social science and infrastructure networks and the human-technology interface}, volume={22}, ISSN={["1572-896X"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-05022-2}, DOI={10.1007/s11051-020-05022-2}, number={9}, journal={JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Berube, D. M. and Bogomoletc, E. and Eng, N. and Jones, J. L. and Jokerst, N.}, year={2020}, month={Sep} }
 @article{berube_2018, title={How social science should complement scientific discovery: lessons from nanoscience}, volume={20}, ISSN={["1572-896X"]}, DOI={10.1007/s11051-018-4210-x}, number={5}, journal={JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH}, author={Berube, David M.}, year={2018}, month={Apr} }
 @article{schwamm_chumbler_brown_fonarow_berube_nystrom_suter_zavala_polsky_radhakrishnan_et al._2017, title={Recommendations for the Implementation of Telehealth in Cardiovascular and Stroke Care A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association}, volume={135}, ISSN={["1524-4539"]}, DOI={10.1161/cir.0000000000000475}, abstractNote={The aim of this policy statement is to provide a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence evaluating the use of telemedicine in cardiovascular and stroke care and to provide consensus policy suggestions. We evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in advancing healthcare quality, identify legal and regulatory barriers that impede telehealth adoption or delivery, propose steps to overcome these barriers, and identify areas for future research to ensure that telehealth continues to enhance the quality of cardiovascular and stroke care. The result of these efforts is designed to promote telehealth models that ensure better patient access to high-quality cardiovascular and stroke care while striving for optimal protection of patient safety and privacy.}, number={7}, journal={CIRCULATION}, author={Schwamm, Lee H. and Chumbler, Neale and Brown, Ed and Fonarow, Gregg C. and Berube, David and Nystrom, Karin and Suter, Robert and Zavala, Mirian and Polsky, Daniel and Radhakrishnan, Kavita and et al.}, year={2017}, month={Feb}, pages={E24–E44} }
 @inbook{berube_cummings_2016, place={NY}, title={Convergence in Ethical Implications and Communication of Emerging Technologies}, booktitle={Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence}, publisher={Springer}, author={Berube, David M and Cummings, C.}, editor={Bainbridge, W.S. and Roco, M.Editors}, year={2016}, pages={755–766} }
 @article{cummings_berube_lavelle_2013, title={Influences of individual-level characteristics on risk perceptions to various categories of environmental health and safety risks}, volume={16}, ISSN={["1466-4461"]}, DOI={10.1080/13669877.2013.788544}, abstractNote={Over the last five decades, social science researchers have examined how the public perceives the risks associated with a variety of environmental health and safety (EHS) hazards. The body of literature that has been emerged diverse both in the methodology employed to collect and analyze data and in the subject of study. The findings have confirmed that risk perceptions vary between groups of individuals as well as between categories of EHS risks. However, the extant literature on EHS risk perceptions has failed to provide empirical insights into how risk perceptions can be best explained according to the interplay of both (1) the category of EHS hazard appraised and (2) the prominent individual-level characteristics that best explain observed risk perception differences. This study addresses this deficiency in the literature by providing insights into the individual and cumulative roles that various individual-level variables play in characterizing risk perceptions to various categories of EHS risks including ‘agentic risks’ like street drug use and cigarette smoking, ‘emerging technological risks’ like nanoparticles and cloning, and ‘manufacturing risks’ like air and chemical pollution. Our data are drawn from the 2009 Citizens, Science, and Emerging Technologies national study of United States households that investigated public perceptions of EHS risks, traditional and emerging media use, and various individual characteristics like personal demographics, socioeconomic factors, and perceptual filters. The findings show that some categories of EHS risks like those associated with emerging technologies may be more easily predicted than other categories of risks and that individual-level characteristics vary in their explanative power between risk categories even among a single sample of respondents.}, number={10}, journal={JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH}, author={Cummings, Christopher L. and Berube, David M. and Lavelle, Mary E.}, year={2013}, month={Nov}, pages={1277–1295} }
 @inbook{watson_berube_hristov_strohecker_betz_allen_burczyk_howard_mcgee_gymer_et al._2013, title={VIA - Visualizing Individual Actions to Develop a Sustainable Community Culture through Cycling}, ISBN={9783642393501 9783642393518}, ISSN={0302-9743 1611-3349}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39351-8_35}, DOI={10.1007/978-3-642-39351-8_35}, abstractNote={Improving the sustainability of our society requires significant change in our collective behavior. But today, individuals in our society have no regular way of seeing that collective behavior, or how their own behavior compares to it. We are creating a research network that will study how new technologies such as mobiles and visualization can encourage individuals to change their behavior to improve sustainability. In Winston-Salem NC, network members will use new technologies to engage the community about its use of transportation—especially biking—and study how that communication affects sustainability awareness and behavior.}, booktitle={Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions}, publisher={Springer Berlin Heidelberg}, author={Watson, Benjamin and Berube, David and Hristov, Nickolay and Strohecker, Carol and Betz, Scott and Allen, Louise and Burczyk, Matthew and Howard, Amber and McGee, William Anthony and Gymer, Matthew and et al.}, year={2013}, pages={316–325} }
 @inproceedings{watson_berube_hristov_strohecker_betz_allen_burczyk_howard_mcgee_gymer_et al._2013, title={VIA - visualizing individual actions to develop a sustainable community culture through cycling}, volume={8028}, booktitle={Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence}, author={Watson, B. and Berube, D. and Hristov, N. and Strohecker, C. and Betz, S. and Allen, L. and Burczyk, M. and Howard, A. and McGee, W. A. and Gymer, M and et al.}, year={2013}, pages={316–325} }
 @inbook{berube_2011, place={NY, NY}, title={Breaking the Carbon Barrier}, url={https://www.routledge.com/Nanobiomaterials-Handbook/Sitharaman/p/book/9781138076525}, booktitle={Nanobiomaterials Handbook}, publisher={CRC Press}, author={Berube, D.M.}, editor={Sitharaman, B.Editor}, year={2011}, pages={32–1 – 32–9} }
 @article{berube_cummings_cacciatore_scheufele_kalin_2011, title={Characteristics and classification of nanoparticles: Expert Delphi survey}, volume={5}, ISSN={["1743-5404"]}, DOI={10.3109/17435390.2010.521633}, abstractNote={Abstract Research needs assessment regarding environmental health and safety (EHS) of nanoparticles is problematic. Generating benchmark data to assess research and policy initiatives seems daunting. This study's findings present more granular and qualitative assessments of expert preferences and concerns. This three-round Delphi study elicits expert estimations of problematic nanoparticle characteristics and classifications from a sample of nanoscience experts in chemistry, EHS policy, engineering, environmental toxicology, and human toxicology (n = 18). The Delphi method is a forecasting tool designed for expert evaluation of events under high degrees of uncertainty. Results demonstrate high concordance indicating favorable consensus among the sample concerning characteristics and classifications of nanoparticles that are potentially or actually problematic to EHS. These findings establish a benchmark for future investigations of expert preferences and concerns.}, number={2}, journal={NANOTOXICOLOGY}, author={Berube, David and Cummings, Christopher and Cacciatore, Michael and Scheufele, Dietram and Kalin, Jason}, year={2011}, month={Jun}, pages={236–243} }
 @article{berube_cummings_frith_binder_oldendick_2011, title={Comparing nanoparticle risk perceptions to other known EHS risks}, volume={13}, ISSN={1388-0764 1572-896X}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S11051-011-0325-Z}, DOI={10.1007/s11051-011-0325-z}, number={8}, journal={Journal of Nanoparticle Research}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Berube, David M. and Cummings, Christopher L. and Frith, Jordan H. and Binder, Andrew R. and Oldendick, Robert}, year={2011}, month={Mar}, pages={3089–3099} }
 @article{berube_2011, title={Decision ethics and emerging technologies}, volume={2}, url={https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt}, number={3}, journal={European Journal of Law and Technology}, author={Berube, D.}, year={2011}, pages={18} }
 @article{morain_frith_cummings_berube_2011, title={Review Essay: Understanding Digital Media and Society}, volume={61}, ISSN={["0021-9916"]}, DOI={10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01560.x}, abstractNote={Bookstore shelves are filled with works about the digital media revolution, the authors of which claim to have an inside and nuanced understanding of one or more digital media artifacts, such as Facebook or Twitter. The recent proliferation of literature on emerging technologies and changing social behavior makes it difficult to find well-researched and engaging arguments that are relevant to digital media scholars. Fortunately, Polity's Digital Media and Society Series has consistently published one of the strongest collections devoted to digital media studies. The Digital Media and Society Series includes 12 books on diverse topics ranging from the challenges facing the music industry to the explosion of mobile communication. We have chosen to focus on 3 of the 12 books in this review to provide a snapshot of the research you can expect from Polity; each book in the series deserves its own thorough review and we recommend all 12 books in the series for their own respective audiences and purposes. The three we chose capture the breadth and variety of the series as a whole, including a detailed discussion of late capitalist society (The Information Society), an excellent examination of the organizing technology of the Information Age (Search Engine Society), and an analysis of a specific digital media community (YouTube).}, number={3}, journal={JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION}, author={Morain, Matthew and Frith, Jordan and Cummings, Christopher and Berube, David M.}, year={2011}, month={Jun}, pages={E12–E14} }
 @article{frith_morain_cummings_berube_2011, title={The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains}, volume={61}, ISSN={["0021-9916"]}, DOI={10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01535.x}, abstractNote={McLuhan (2003) argued that we cannot fully understand a medium until we have moved on to a new dominant medium. McLuhan may have been partially correct, but it seems overly defeatist to relegate medium studies to the field of history, and despite its contemporaneity, many scholars have actively criticized our current dominant medium: the Internet. Although some academics have certainly taken a utopian stance to the Internet—most notably early theorists such as Negroponte (1996) and Lèvy (1997)—others have criticized the growth of the Internet from diverse disciplinary perspectives. The popular press, however, has seen much more of the Wired-inspired techno-utopian writing than any kind of cogent criticism on how life is being reshaped by a near complete reliance on the Internet. It is within this context that Nicholas Carr and Jaron Lanier set out to establish a necessary corrective to the techno-utopian strands that run through the popular literature on the Internet. The two authors come from different backgrounds—Carr is a New York Times best-selling journalist and Lanier is a founding father of virtual reality and an influential tech guru—and use different support for their arguments, but both books can be read together as a criticism of the blind and indiscriminate embrace of the Internet by the public at large. They remind the reader that technological adoption has consequences, and we all need to consider whether the consequences are worth it. For that, they should be commended. However, both books also suffer from major weaknesses that mar their intended effectiveness. We will start with a brief description of Carr's The Shallows and then move on to Lanier's You Are Not a Gadget.}, number={1}, journal={JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION}, author={Frith, Jordan and Morain, Matt and Cummings, Chris and Berube, David}, year={2011}, month={Feb}, pages={E9–E12} }
 @misc{berube_2009, title={Panicology: What are you afraid of? Two statisticians explain what's worth worrying about (and what's not) in the 21st century}, volume={18}, number={3}, journal={Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)}, author={Berube, D. M.}, year={2009}, pages={375–376} }
 @article{berube_2009, title={Risk: The science and politics of fear}, volume={18}, DOI={10.1177/09636625090180030803}, number={3}, journal={Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)}, author={Berube, David M}, year={2009}, pages={375–376} }
 @misc{berube_2009, title={The public acceptance of nanomedicine: a personal perspective}, volume={1}, ISSN={["1939-0041"]}, DOI={10.1002/wnan.30}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={1}, journal={WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-NANOMEDICINE AND NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY}, author={Berube, David M.}, year={2009}, pages={2–5} }
 @article{borm_berube_2008, title={A tale of opportunities, uncertainties, and risks}, volume={3}, ISSN={["1878-044X"]}, DOI={10.1016/S1748-0132(08)70016-1}, abstractNote={Nanoscience and nanotechnologies are expected to change industrial production and economics over the decades to come. This new field is also exciting since it sweeps away the traditional barriers between disciplines such as chemistry, physics, and biology. Nanotechnology requires different thinking in management, collaboration, value chain propositions, education, and calls for research grants. Apart from the benefits and challenges, nanotechnologies also produce uncertainties and risks. For some, the degree of potential hazard associated with nanoparticles is so disquieting that in January 2008 the UK Soil Association adopted a nano-free policy for products certified as organic.}, number={1-2}, journal={NANO TODAY}, author={Borm, Paul J. A. and Berube, David}, year={2008}, pages={56–59} }
 @article{berube_2008, title={Reply from David Berube, NCSU}, volume={10}, ISSN={1388-0764 1572-896X}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9443-7}, DOI={10.1007/s11051-008-9443-7}, number={S1}, journal={Journal of Nanoparticle Research}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Berube, David M.}, year={2008}, month={Aug}, pages={265–266} }
 @article{berube_2008, title={Rhetorical gamesmanship in the nano debates over sunscreens and nanoparticles}, volume={10}, ISSN={["1572-896X"]}, DOI={10.1007/s11051-008-9362-7}, abstractNote={Communication of risk profiles associated with sunscreens incorporating nanoparticles has been challenging when some communicators shift risk profiles from highly problematic nanoparticles to others, which are much less problematic. This article vets a popular publication from a civic advocacy group that cited scientific research papers to make environmental health and safety claims. The phenomenon of risk profile shifts is demonstrated by re-examining the scientific articles being cited. In addition, the authors for correspondence for each of the articles cited were interviewed via email and their comments about the claims made are included.}, journal={JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH}, author={Berube, David M.}, year={2008}, pages={23–37} }
 @article{berube_2006, title={Summit time}, volume={1}, ISSN={1748-0132}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1748-0132(06)70026-3}, DOI={10.1016/S1748-0132(06)70026-3}, abstractNote={A great deal of money is spent on nanotech research, but little of it on societal and ethical implications: a summit is needed to share findings and failures}, number={1}, journal={Nano Today}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Berube, David}, year={2006}, month={Feb}, pages={48} }