Gary L Comstock

Connecting Ethical Reasoning to Global Challenges through Analysis of Argumentation

Sjogren, C. A., Comstock, G., & Goller, C. C. (2023, March 16). (J. Shaffer, Ed.). JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION, Vol. 3.

Bovine Prospection, the Mesocorticolimbic Pathways, and Neuroethics: Is a Cow's Future Like Ours?

In L. S. M. Johnson & A. Fenton (Eds.), Neuroethics and Nonhuman Animals. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030310103

Concerning Cattle

In A. Barnhill, M. Budolfson, & T. Doggett (Eds.), Oxford Handbooks Online.

Getting It Together: Psychological Unity and Deflationary Accounts of Animal Metacognition

Acta Analytica, 33(4), 431–451.

Far-Persons

In Ethical and Political Approaches to Nonhuman Animal Issues (pp. 39–71).

Do machines have prima facie duties?

Machine Medical Ethics, 74, 79–92.

Do machines have prima facie duties?

In Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering (Vol. 74, pp. 79–92).

Harming Some to Enhance Others

Inquiring into Animal Enhancement, pp. 49–78.

The Role of Philosophers in RCR Training

Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 15(2), 139–142.

Personhood, ethics, and animal cognition: Situating animals in Hare's two-level utilitarianism

[Review of ]. Environmental Values, 22(3), 417–420.

Research ethics: A philosophical guide to the responsible conduct of research

In Research Ethics: A Philosophical Guide to the Responsible Conduct of Research (pp. 1–292).

Ethics and genetically modified foods

In The Philosophy of Food (pp. 122–139).

Genetically Modified Foods

Life Science Ethics, pp. 221–238.

Life Science Ethics

Religion

Life Science Ethics, pp. 15–29.

Intuitive Level System Rules: Commentary on "Utilitarianism and the Evolution of Ecological Ethics"

Comstock, G. (2008, December). SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, Vol. 14, pp. 575–579.

Research ethics education: beyond RCR training

FCTL Newsletter, 2, 1–4.

Why shouldn't turkeys get what they want?

News and Observer [Raleigh, N.C.], Q.

Morality's progress: Essays on humans, other animals, and the rest of nature.

Comstock, G. L. (2005, July). PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, Vol. 114, pp. 416–419.

The production of genetically engineered food is ethical

In Genetic engineering: opposing viewpoints (pp. 110–120). San Diego: Greenhaven.

Religious autobiographies (2nd ed.)

Wadsworth.

What are the ethical issues surrounding genetic modification of nature?

In D. S. W. K. Purves, G. H. Orians, & C. Heller (Eds.), Life: the science of biology (7th ed.) (p. 389). Gordonsville, VA: W. H. Freeman.

Golden rice

In Life science ethics (pp. 307–368). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

More citation vigilance

More citation vigilance

Scientist, 16(17). http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0037009567&partnerID=MN8TOARS

Response to Lynch

Between the Species: An Online Journal for the Study of Philosophy and Animals, 13(2).

Theodicy and animals: response to Joseph Lynch

Between the Species: A Journal of Ethics, 2.

A brief for the royal commission on genetic modification of New Zealand

Agricultural ethics

In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy v.1 (Vol. 1).

An alternative ethic for animals

In J. Hodges & I. K. Han (Eds.), Livestock, ethics and quality of life. CAB International.

Conclusion

Vexing Nature?, pp. 285–288.

Introduction

Vexing Nature?, pp. 1–11.

Make plans on the hoof

Times Higher Education Supplement, 19.

Minutes from the technology transfer meeting

World Food Prize Symposium.

Problems for the Case Against Ag Biotech, Part I: Intrinsic Objections

Vexing Nature?, pp. 175–224.

Problems for the Case Against Ag Biotech, Part II: Extrinsic Objections

Vexing Nature?, pp. 225–283.

Vexing Nature?

Vexing nature? On the ethical case against agricultural biotechnology

Kluwer Academic Publishers.

The Iowa State University Model Bioethics Institutes

Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 19, 323–328.

The Iowa State University model bioethics institutes

Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, Vol. 19, pp. 323–328. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-9644259297&partnerID=MN8TOARS

Is it unnatural to genetically engineer plants?

WEED SCIENCE, 46(6), 647–651.

Research with transgenic animals: Obligations and issues

Journal of Biolaw and Business, 2(1), 51–55. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031765747&partnerID=MN8TOARS

Theism and environmental ethics

In P. L. Quinn & C. Taliaferro (Eds.), A companion to philosophy of religion (pp. 508–513). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Toward an evangelical environmental ethic

In S. M. Postiglione & R. Brungs (Eds.), Christianity and the environmental ethos (pp. 69–85). St. Louis: ITEST Faith/Science Press.

An extensionist environmental ethic

Biodiversity and Conservation, 4(8), 827–837.

Do agriculturalists need a new, an ecocentric, ethic? 1994 Presidential address to the agriculture, food, and human values society

Agriculture and Human Values, 12(1), 2–16.

Ethics and agricultural biotechnology: more opposing viewpoints

Journal of Agricultural &Amp; Environmental Ethics, 8(2), 95–197. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0029532150&partnerID=MN8TOARS

Introduction

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 8(2), 95–97.

Ethics and scientific research.

SRA Journal, 26(2), 33–37. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0028505250&partnerID=MN8TOARS

Introduction

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 7(1), 1–6.

Some Virtues and Vices of Agricultural Technology

Agricultural Ethics: Issues for the 21st Century.

Spine Update What is Medical Ethics?

Spine, 19(11), 1297–1300.

Spine updatewhat is medical ethics

Spine, 19(11), 1297–1300. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0028356969&partnerID=MN8TOARS

THE TRUTH OF RELIGIOUS NARRATIVES

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION, 34(3), 131–150.

Ethical and environmental considerations in the release of herbicide resistant crops

Agriculture and Human Values, 9(3), 31–43.

Should We Genetically Engineer Hogs?

Between the Species: An Online Journal for the Study of Philosophy and Animals, 8(4), 196–202.

The Case Against bGH

Social Philosophy Today, 7, 65–98.

The Moral Irrelevance of Autonomy

Between the Species: An Online Journal for the Study of Philosophy and Animals, 8(1).

What obligations have scientists to transgenic animals?

In Ethics and patenting of transgenic organisms (p. 7). Ithaca, NY: National Agricultural Biotechnology Council, 159 Biotechnology, Cornell University.

Ethics and agricultural biotechnology: opposing viewpoints

Journal of Agricultural &Amp; Environmental Ethics, 4(2). http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0026346784&partnerID=MN8TOARS

Introduction

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 4(2), 101–107.

The costs and benefits of bGH may not be distributed fairly

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 4(2), 121–130.

Genetically engineered herbicide resistance, part two

Journal of Agricultural Ethics, 3(2), 114–146.

BOOK REVIEWS

Journal of the American Academy of Religion, LVII(1), 213–217.

Genetically engineered herbicide resistance, part one

Journal of Agricultural Ethics, 2(4), 263–306.

Is Postmodern Religious Dialogue Possible?

Faith and Philosophy, 6(2), 189–197.

The case against bGH

Agriculture and Human Values, 5(3), 36–52.

Is there a moral obligation to save the family farm?

Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

Two types of narrative theology

Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 55(4), 687–717.

Face to face with It: The naive Reader's moral response to ?Ivan Ilych?

Neophilologus, 70(3), 321–333.

Reason and Right. Garth Hallett

The Journal of Religion, 65(4), 579–580.

On Doing the Sacred Text

Liturgy, 2(3), 25–30.

The Yoruba and Religious Change

Journal of Religion in Africa, 10(1), 1–12.

Articulate reasons

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 105–117.

Avoid plagiarism

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 58–67.

Beware intuition

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 68–78.

Clarify statistics

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 144–154.

Conclusion

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 285–287.

Cultivate responsibility

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 274–284.

Inform subjects

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 169–183.

Introduction

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 1–20.

Justify decisions

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 79–90.

Mentor inclusively

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 184–201.

Preserve environments

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 267–273.

Protect manuscripts

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 133–143.

Recognize property

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 202–217.

Report misconduct

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 39–57.

Reveal conflicts

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 218–228.

Treat humanely

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 243–266.

Write cooperatively

Comstock, G. Research Ethics, pp. 118–132.