@article{isleib_rice_mozingo_copeland_graeber_novitzky_pattee_sanders_mozingo_coker_2006, title={Registration of 'Brantley' peanut}, volume={46}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2005.12.0492}, abstractNote={‘Brantley’ (Reg. no. CV-86, PI 642026) is a large-seeded virginia-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea L. subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea) cultivar with high oleic fatty acid content in its seed oil, essentially derived from the ‘NC 7’ cultivar (Wynne et al., 1979). Brantley was tested under the experimental designation N00090ol and was released jointly by the North Carolina Agric. Res. Service (NCARS) and the USDA-ARS in 2005. Brantley was tested by the NCARS, by the Virginia Agric. Exp. Stn. (VAES), and five other state agricultural experiment stations participating in the Uniform Peanut Performance Tests (UPPT). Brantley is named in honor of the late Ms. Peggy Y. Brantley, long-time office administrator to the peanut breeding and genetics programs at North Carolina State Univ. (NCSU). Brantley is a virginia market type cultivar possessing alternate branching pattern, intermediate runner growth habit, medium green foliage, large seeds with tan testa averaging 895 mg seed, approximately 65% jumbo pods and 24% fancy pods, and extra large kernel content of approximately 50%. Brantley was developed by backcrossing the high-oleic trait patented by the University of Florida (Norden et al., 1987; Moore and Knauft, 1989; Knauft et al., 1993) into the NC 7 cultivar from Florida line F435 (Moore and Knauft, 1989). In the backcrossing steps, F4:5 progenies or individual F2 seeds were analyzed for fatty acid profiles using gas chromatography (Zeile et al., 1993), and high-oleic families or seeds were selected. BC4F2:3 families were grown in a replicated preliminary yield test in 1999. N00090ol was numbered in 2000 on entry into the NCSUAdvanced Yield Test series. Agronomic performance of Brantley has been evaluated in 16 trials conducted by the NCARS breeding program over 5 yr and 24 trials (including early and late diggings as separate trials) in the joint VAES-NCARS Peanut Variety and Quality Evaluation (PVQE) program over 3 yr (Coker and Mozingo, 2004, 2005). Brantley was also tested in the Uniform Peanut Performance Test series conducted at nine sites in seven states in 2003 (Branch et al., 2004). Because it was essentially derived from NC 7 by backcrossing, most characteristics of Brantley are similar to those of NC 7. The following comparisons are based on results from the PVQE program except as noted. Compared with NC 7, Brantley has similar pod yield (4479 vs. 4492 kg ha,ns), sound mature kernel content (67%), and meat content (73%), but more jumbo pods (64 vs. 58%, P , 0.05), fewer fancy size pods (24 vs. 29%, P, 0.05), more extra large kernels (ELK) (53 vs. 48%, P , 0.05), and greater jumbo pod brightness (44.5 vs. 43.5 Hunter L score, P , 0.01) (Isleib et al., 1997) and average pod brightness (43.9 vs. 43.0 Hunter L score, P , 0.01). The ratio of oleic to linoleic fatty acid of Brantley was greater than that of NC 7 (27.77 vs. 2.61, P , 0.01). In the NCSU trials, Brantley had greater brightness of jumbo pods than NC 7 (46.3 vs. 45.5 Hunter L score, P, 0.01), greater average pod brightness (45.1 vs. 44.4 Hunter L score, P , 0.05), and greater ELK content (46 vs. 43%, P , 0.01). Flavor attributes of roasted sound mature kernel samples from eight NCSU trials were evaluated by a trained sensory panel under the direction of USDA personnel. Averaged across eight samples taken from NCARS trials in 2000 and 2002 and adjusted to common values of roast color and fruity attribute (Pattee and Giesbrecht, 1990), the roasted peanut, sweet, bitter, and astringent attributes of flavor in Brantley were not different from those in NC 7, the flavor standard for the virginia market type. Averaged across ELK samples from nine UPPT locations from 2003 (USDA-ARS, 2004), Brantley was not significantly different from NC 7 for intensity of roasted peanut [4.41 vs. 4.61 flavor intensity units (fiu), ns], sweet (1.98 vs. 2.02 fiu, ns), or bitter (3.07 vs. 2.97 fiu, ns). Although it was not developed specifically to carry any particular disease resistance, Brantley was evaluated for resistance to diseases common to the Virginia-Carolina region. Because it was essentially derived from NC 7 by backcrossing, it was found to have the same susceptibilities to disease as NC 7. Brantley’s reaction to early leafspot (caused by Cercospora arachidicola S. Hori) was evaluated from 2001 through 2004 in four field trials with no application of leafspot fungicide during the entire season. Defoliation was rated on a proportional scale of 1 (no defoliation) to 9 (complete defoliation) in late September or early October each year, and yield was measured. Brantley was not significantly different from NC 7 in defoliation (7.0 vs. 6.8 defoliation score, ns) or yield (2380 vs. 2346 kg ha, ns). Brantley’s reactions to Cylindrocladium black rot (CBR) {caused by Cylindrocladium parasiticum Crous, Wingfield & Alfenas [syn. C. crotalariae (Loos) D.K. Bell & Sobers]} and to Sclerotinia blight (caused by Sclerotinia minor Jagger) were evaluated by the NCSU breeding project in four replicated tests on naturally infested soils with no chemical control of the soilborne diseases. Brantley was not different from NC 7 in incidence of CBR (37 vs. 33%, ns) or Sclerotinia blight (28 vs. 44%, ns). Brantley’s reaction to Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) was evaluated from 2001 through 2004 in four field trials with seeds spaced 50 cm apart and no application of insecticides to control the thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds), the vector of the virus. Brantley was not different from NC 7 in incidence of TSWV symptoms (44 vs. 36%, ns). Like its recurrent parent NC 7, Brantley should be considered susceptible to all four of these diseases. Brantley is adapted to the Virginia–Carolina peanut production area but also has performed well in the southeastern US production area including Georgia, Florida, and Alabama. Breeder seed of Brantley will be maintained by the N.C. Agricultural Research Service, Box 7643, N.C. State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7643. Foundation seed will be distributed by the N.C. Foundation Seed Producers, Inc., 8220 Riley Hill Rd., Zebulon, NC 27597. The N.C. Agricultural Research Service will provide small (50–100 seed) samples to research organizations for research purposes. An application is pending for protection of Brantley under the U.S. Plant Variety Protection Act as amended in 1994, under which Brantley may be sold only as a class of Certified seed. The high-oleic trait is protected by U.S. Patents (No. 5922,390, 6063,984, and 6121,472) issued to theUniv. of Florida by whose permission the trait was used.}, number={5}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Isleib, T. G. and Rice, P. W. and Mozingo, R. W., II and Copeland, S. C. and Graeber, J. B. and Novitzky, W. P. and Pattee, H. E. and Sanders, T. H. and Mozingo, R. W. and Coker, D. L.}, year={2006}, pages={2309–2311} }
 @article{isleib_rice_mozingo_copeland_graeber_pattee_sanders_mozingo_coker_2006, title={Registration of 'Phillips' peanut}, volume={46}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2005.12.0491}, abstractNote={‘Phillips’ (Reg. no. CV-85, PI 642025) is a large-seeded virginia-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea L. subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea) cultivar with a high percentage of bright fancy pods. Phillips was tested under the experimental designation N98003 and was released jointly by the North Carolina Agric. Res. Service (NCARS) and the USDA-ARS in 2005. Phillips was tested by theNCARS, by theVirginiaAgric. Exp. Stn. (VAES), and five other state agricultural experiment stations participating in the Uniform Peanut Performance Tests. Phillips is named for the late Ms. Ida G. “Gerry” Phillips, long-time research aide to the peanut breeding program at North Carolina State University (NCSU). Phillips is a virginia market type cultivar possessing alternate branching pattern, intermediate runner growth habit, medium green foliage, large seeds with tan testa averaging 835 mg seed, approximately 34% jumbo pods and 45% fancy pods. Phillips is an F5–derived line selected from a cross between two early maturing NCSU breeding lines, N90014E used as the female and N91024 used as the male. Both parents were F5–derived selections from a cross between ‘NC 7’ (Wynne et al., 1979) and ‘NC 9’ (Wynne et al., 1986). Singleseed descent was practiced in the F2 at the PeanutBelt Research Station (PBRS) in Bertie Co. near Lewiston, NC, during the summer of 1994 and in the F3 at a winter nursery at Juana Diaz, PR. The F1:4 family was subjected to selection for pod size and shape in the field at PBRS in 1995 and the F4:5 family in 1996. Yield and grade data were collected on F5:6 families in a replicated preliminary yield test in 1997. The F5:7 family was tested under the experimental designation N98003 in subsequent years. Agronomic performance of Phillips was evaluated in 16 trials conducted by the NCARS breeding program from 1998 through 2004 and 40 trials (including early and late diggings as separate trials) in the joint VAES-NCARS Peanut Variety and Quality Evaluation (PVQE) program from 2000 through 2004 (Coker andMozingo, 2004, 2005). Phillips was also tested in the Uniform Peanut Performance Test (UPPT) series conducted at nine sites in seven states in 2003 (Branch et al., 2004). The following comparisons are based on results from thePVQEprogramexcept as noted. Comparedwith ‘NC-V11’ (Wynne et al., 1991), Phillips had similar pod yield (5102 vs. 5014 kg ha, ns), and fancy pod content (45 vs. 47%, ns), but greater jumbo pod content (34 vs. 26%, P, 0.01), jumbo pod brightness (44.5 vs. 43.5 Hunter L score,P, 0.01) (Isleib et al., 1997), fancy pod brightness (45.8 vs. 44.9 Hunter L score, P , 0.01), average pod brightness (46.1 vs. 45.0 Hunter L score, P , 0.01), extra large kernel (ELK) content (47 vs. 34%, P , 0.01), soundmature kernel content (69 vs. 67%, P, 0.01), and meat content (74 vs. 73%, P, 0.01), and crop value at federal support price ($2095 vs. $1999 ha, P , 0.01). Although the ratio of oleic to linoleic fatty acid in seed oil of Phillips was greater than that of NC-V 11 (1.63 vs. 1.57, P , 0.05), both cultivars have oleic acid levels considered to be low within the normal range for virginia-type peanuts. In the NCSU trials, Phillips had greater brightness of fancy pods than NC-V 11 (46.9 vs. 45.3 Hunter L score, P , 0.01), greater average pod brightness (46.5 vs. 45.3 Hunter L score, P , 0.01), greater ELK content (43 vs. 33%, P, 0.01), and greater meat content (72 vs. 70%, P , 0.05). Flavor attributes of roasted sound mature kernel samples from three NCSU trials were evaluated by a trained sensory panel under the direction of USDA personnel. Adjusted to common values of roast color and fruity attribute (Pattee and Giesbrecht, 1990), intensity of the roasted peanut attribute of flavor in Phillips was not different from that in NC 7 [3.36 vs. 3.54 flavor intensity units (fiu), ns], the flavor standard for the virginia market-type, but intensity of the sweet attribute was higher (3.45 vs. 2.70 fiu, P , 0.05) and that of the bitter attribute lower 2.30 vs. 2.73 fiu, P , 0.05). Averaged across ELK samples from nine UPPT locations from 2003, Phillips was not significantly different from NC 7 for intensity of roasted peanut (4.55 vs. 4.61 fiu, ns), sweet (2.03 vs. 2.02 fiu, ns), or bitter (3.05 vs. 2.97 fiu, ns) (USDA, 2004). Although it was not developed specifically to carry any particular disease resistance, Phillips was evaluated for resistance to diseases common to the Virginia-Carolina region. Phillips’s reaction to early leafspot (caused by Cercospora arachidicola S. Hori) was evaluated from 1999 through 2004 in six field trials with no application of leafspot fungicide during the entire season. Defoliation was rated on a proportional scale of 1 (no defoliation) to 9 (complete defoliation) in late September or early October each year, and yield was measured on the unsprayed plots. Phillips was not significantly different from NCV 11 in defoliation (6.7 vs. 7.0 defoliation score, ns) or yield (2707 vs. 2563 kg ha, ns). Phillips’s reactions to Cylindrocladium black rot (CBR) {caused byCylindrocladium parasiticum Crous, Wingfield & Alfenas [syn. C. crotalariae (Loos) D.K. Bell & Sobers]} and to Sclerotinia blight (caused by Sclerotinia minor Jagger) were evaluated by the NCSU breeding project in six replicated tests on naturally infested soils with no chemical control of the soilborne diseases. Phillips was not different from NC-V 11 in incidence of CBR (27 vs. 23%, ns) or Sclerotinia blight (39 vs. 31%, ns). Phillips’s reaction to Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) was evaluated from 1998 through 2004 in six field trials with seeds spaced 50 cm apart and no application of insecticides to control thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds), the vector of the virus. Phillips was not different from NC-V 11 in incidence of TSWV symptoms (35 vs. 30%, ns). Phillips should be considered susceptible to all four of these diseases. Phillips is adapted to the Virginia–Carolina peanut production area but also has performed well in the southeastern U.S. production area including Georgia, Florida, and Alabama. Breeder seed of Phillips will be maintained by the N.C. Agricultural Research Service, Box 7643, N.C. State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7643. Foundation seed will be distributed by the N.C. Foundation Seed Producers, Inc., 8220 Riley Hill Rd., Zebulon, NC 27597. The N.C. Agricultural Research Service will provide small (50–100 seed) samples to research organizations for research purposes. An application for protection of Phillips under the U.S. Plant Variety Protection Act as amended in 1994 is pending. Phillips may be sold only as a class of Certified seed.}, number={5}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Isleib, T. G. and Rice, P. W. and Mozingo, R. W., II and Copeland, S. C. and Graeber, J. B. and Pattee, H. E. and Sanders, T. H. and Mozingo, R. W. and Coker, D. L.}, year={2006}, pages={2308–2309} }
 @article{isleib_rice_mozingo_copeland_graeber_shew_smith_melouk_stalker_2006, title={Registration of N96076L peanut germplasm line}, volume={46}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2005.12.0479}, abstractNote={N96076L (Reg. no. GP-125, PI 641950) is a large-seeded virginia-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea L. subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea) germplasm line with resistance to multiple diseases including early leafspot (caused by Cercospora arachidicola S. Hori), Cylindrocladium black rot (CBR) {caused by Cylindrocladium parasiticum Crous, Wingfield & Alfenas [syn. C. crotalariae (Loos)D.K.Bell&Sobers]}, Sclerotiniablight (caused by Sclerotinia minor Jagger), and tomato spotted wilt caused by Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV). N96076Lwas released by the NorthCarolinaAgriculturalResearchService (NCARS) in 2005. N96076Lwas tested by theNCARS, by the VirginiaAgricultural Experiment Station (VAES), and the USDA-ARSWheat, Peanut and Other Field Crops Research Unit at Stillwater, OK. N96076L is a virginia market-type line possessing alternate branching pattern, runner growth habit, medium green foliage, large seeds with dull tan testa averaging 880 mg seed, approximately 70% jumbo pods and 22% fancy pods. N96076L is an F4–derived line selected from cross X91053 made in 1991 using NCSU breeding line N90004 as the female and leafspotresistant germplasm line GP NCWS 13 (Stalker et al., 2002) as the male. N90004 was an F5–derived line selected from NCSU cross X84002 between ‘NC 7’ (Wynne et al., 1979) and ‘Florigiant’ (Carver, 1969). GP NC WS 13 has complex ancestry. One quarter of its ancestry comes from GP NC WS 4 (Stalker and Beute, 1993), a tetraploid (2n 5 4x 5 40) selection from a cross between PI 261942 (A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiataWaldron var. fastigiata) and leafspot-resistant diploid (2n5 2x5 20) wild species A. cardenasii Krapov. & W.C. Gregory GKP 10017 (PI 262141). One quarter of GP NC WS 13’s ancestry comes from leafspot-resistantA. hypogaea PI 270807, and one half from the cultivar ‘NC 5’ (Emery andGregory, 1970), which has moderate resistance to early leafspot. F1 plants of cross X91053 were grown at a winter nursery in Puerto Rico, single-seed descent was practiced in the F2 and F3 generations, and single-plant selections were made in the F4 generation. F4:5 families were planted at Peanut Belt Research Station (PBRS) at Lewiston in Bertie County, NC, in a field receiving no fungicide treatment to control leafspot in the summer of 1995. Families exhibiting reduced levels of defoliation were harvested in bulk and retained for evaluation in the Leafspot Test, a two-rep test of defoliation, yield, and grade grown without leafspot control at PBRS in 1996. Family X91053 F2-S-S-08: F05 was numbered N96076L when entered in the 1996 Leafspot Test. Although N96076L was developed for resistance to early leafspot, it also was evaluated for resistance to other diseases common to theVirginia–Carolina region.N96076L’s reaction to early leafspot was evaluated from 1996 through 2004 in 12 field trials with no application of leafspot fungicide during the entire season. Defoliation was rated on a proportional scale of 1 (no defoliation) to 9 (complete defoliation) in late September or early October each year, and yield was measured on the unsprayed plots. Although N96076L had more defoliation than resistant checkGP-NC343(Campbell etal., 1971) (5.5vs.4.3,P, 0.01), it had less than either ‘NC 12C’ (Isleib et al., 1997) (5.7 vs. 6.2 defoliation score,P, 0.01) or ‘Perry’ (Isleib et al., 2003) (5.8 vs. 6.6defoliation score,P,0.01), the twomost resistantvirginiatype cultivars. N96076L did not differ significantly from any of these three checks for yield in the absence of leafspot control. N96076L’s reactions to Cylindrocladium black rot (CBR) and to Sclerotinia blight were evaluated by the NCSU breeding project from 1997 through 2004 in eight replicated tests conducted in North Carolina on naturally infested soils with no chemical control of these diseases. N96076L was not significantly different from the resistant cultivar Perry in incidence of CBR (8 vs. 10%, ns), but it did have lower CBR incidence than NC 12C (9 vs. 21%, P , 0.01) and ‘Gregory’ (Isleib et al., 1999) (8 vs. 17%, P, 0.01). N96076L was not different from the partially resistant cultivar Perry in incidence of Sclerotinia blight (7 vs. 21%, ns), but it did have lower incidence than NC 12C (6 vs. 28%, P , 0.01) and Gregory (7 vs. 30%, P, 0.01). Yield, grade and Sclerotinia blight incidence in N96076L were evaluated by USDA-ARS personnel at Stillwater, OK, in a two-rep trial conducted in infested soil at Fort Cobb, OK, during 1998. Disease incidence in N96076L was less than in any of the lines tested except ‘Tamrun 98’ (Simpson et al., 2000) (16 vs. 30%, ns), but there was no variation in yield among the lines tested. Physiological resistance to S. minor was documented in detached plant part inoculations under controlled laboratory conditions (Smith, 2004, p. 72–93). Lesion development measured by the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) was significantly smaller for all parts with the exception of mainstems when compared to NC 12C and NC 7 (P , 0.0001). In the field, resistance most likely due to avoidance was also documented. Fewer infections were detected on lateral branches of N96076L plants when compared with NC 12C (13 vs. 46%, P , 0.01), Perry, (13 vs. 44%, P , 0.01), and ‘VA 98R’ (Mozingo et al., 2000) (13 vs. 23%, P , 0.01). N96076L’s reaction to TSWV was evaluated from 1997 through 2004 in 18 field trials with seeds spaced 50 cm apart and no application of insecticides to control thrips (Frankliniella fusca Hinds), the vector of the virus. N96076L had lower incidence of TSWV symptoms than NC 12C (22 vs. 45%,P, 0.01), Gregory (26 vs. 33%,P, 0.01), and Perry (25 vs. 52%,P, 0.01) and was not different from resistant check PI 576636 (21 vs. 16%, ns). N96076L should be considered resistant to all four of these diseases. Agronomic performance of N96076L was evaluated in 13 trials conducted by the NCARS breeding program over 1996 to 2004. Although yield of N96076L was not significantly different from that of NC 12C (3774 vs. 4050 kg ha, ns), Gregory (3703 vs. 3960 kg ha, ns) or Perry (3702 vs. 3709 kg ha, ns), its average pod brightness (42.7 Hunter L score) (Isleib et al., 1997) was less (44.6 for NC 12C, P, 0.01; 44.3 for Gregory, P, 0.01; and 44.4 for Perry, P, 0.01), making N96076L unsuitable for use as a cultivar for the in-shell market. N96076L is adapted to the Virginia-Carolina peanut production area. Seed of N96076L will be maintained by the N.C. Agricultural Research Service, Box 7643, N.C. State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7643. Foundation seed will be distributed by the N.C. Foundation Seed Producers, Inc., 8220 Riley Hill Rd., Zebulon, NC 27597. The N.C. Agricultural Research Service will provide small (50–100 seed) samples to research organizations for research purposes.}, number={5}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Isleib, T. G. and Rice, P. W. and Mozingo, R. W., II and Copeland, S. C. and Graeber, J. B. and Shew, B. B. and Smith, D. L. and Melouk, H. A. and Stalker, H. T.}, year={2006}, pages={2329–2330} }