@article{giardina_brown_adunka_buchman_hutson_pillsbury_fitzpatrick_2019, title={Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Response Patterns During Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Preservation}, volume={40}, ISSN={["1538-4667"]}, DOI={10.1097/AUD.0000000000000659}, abstractNote={ Objectives: Electrocochleography (ECochG) obtained through a cochlear implant (CI) is increasingly being tested as an intraoperative monitor during implantation with the goal of reducing surgical trauma. Reducing trauma should aid in preserving residual hearing and improve speech perception overall. The purpose of this study was to characterize intracochlear ECochG responses throughout insertion in a range of array types and, when applicable, relate these measures to hearing preservation. The ECochG signal in cochlear implant subjects is complex, consisting of hair cell and neural generators with differing distributions depending on the etiology and history of hearing loss. Consequently, a focus was to observe and characterize response changes as an electrode advances. }, number={4}, journal={EAR AND HEARING}, author={Giardina, Christopher K. and Brown, Kevin D. and Adunka, Oliver F. and Buchman, Craig A. and Hutson, Kendall A. and Pillsbury, Harold C. and Fitzpatrick, Douglas C.}, year={2019}, pages={833–848} } @article{giardina_khan_pulver_adunka_buchman_brown_pillsbury_fitzpatrick_2018, title={Response Changes During Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Using Extracochlear Electrocochleography}, volume={39}, ISSN={["1538-4667"]}, DOI={10.1097/AUD.0000000000000571}, abstractNote={ Objectives: Electrocochleography is increasingly being utilized as an intraoperative monitor of cochlear function during cochlear implantation (CI). Intracochlear recordings from the advancing electrode can be obtained through the device by on-board capabilities. However, such recordings may not be ideal as a monitor because the recording electrode moves in relation to the neural and hair cell generators producing the responses. The purposes of this study were to compare two extracochlear recording locations in terms of signal strength and feasibility as intraoperative monitoring sites and to characterize changes in cochlear physiology during CI insertion. }, number={6}, journal={EAR AND HEARING}, author={Giardina, Christopher K. and Khan, Tatyana E. and Pulver, Stephen H. and Adunka, Oliver F. and Buchman, Craig A. and Brown, Kevin D. and Pillsbury, Harold C. and Fitzpatrick, Douglas C.}, year={2018}, pages={1146–1156} } @article{ovsianikov_chichkov_adunka_pillsbury_doraiswamy_narayan_2007, title={Rapid prototyping of ossicular replacement prostheses}, volume={253}, ISSN={0169-4332}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.01.062}, DOI={10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.01.062}, abstractNote={Materials used in ossicular replacement prostheses must demonstrate appropriate biological compatibility, acoustic transmission, stability, and stiffness properties. Prostheses prepared using Teflon®, titanium, Ceravital and other conventional materials have demonstrated several problems, including migration, perforation of the tympanic membrane, difficulty in shaping the prostheses, and reactivity with the surrounding tissues. We have used two-photon polymerization for rapid prototyping of Ormocer® middle-ear bone replacement prostheses. Ormocer® surfaces fabricated using two-photon polymerization exhibited acceptable cell viability and cell growth profiles. The Ormocer® prosthesis was able to be inserted and removed from the site of use in the frozen human head without fracture. Our results demonstrate that two-photon polymerization is able to create ossicular replacement prostheses and other medical devices with a larger range of sizes, shapes and materials than other microfabrication techniques.}, number={15}, journal={Applied Surface Science}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Ovsianikov, A. and Chichkov, B. and Adunka, O. and Pillsbury, H. and Doraiswamy, A. and Narayan, R.J.}, year={2007}, month={May}, pages={6603–6607} }